Dr. Charles P. Larson and Dr. Herman Bolker were just two doctors assigned by the US Army War Crimes Branch to do autopsies on corpses found in Nazi camps to find medical proof of Nazi gassings. But despite their examinations of more than a thousand corpses, they found nothing. British doctors and French doctors found no medical evidence of gassings either. The Soviets had insisted in 1943 in connection with their show-trials in Kharkov and Krasnodar that they had found proof of gassings with CO (from diesel engines, no less)--but their proceedings were such an obvious sham that people did not generally take them seriously (except for obvious cookoos like Roberto Muehlenkamp and Eric Hunt,) Any autopsies made by Soviet doctors at any of the camps they "liberated" are unknown.
Please note that there are several photos of American Major Dr. Herman Bolker (Jewish) performing autopsies on alleged "euthanasia victims" at Hadamar--even at the USHMM.
The following video is about Hadamar and Dr. Herman Bolker:
http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675064114_Major-Herman-Boelke_Hadamar-Concentration-Camp_examine-survivors_bodies-exhumed
Although no evidence of "gassing" was found, Bolker and the prosecutors were still able to sentence a hapless German male nurse to death for overdosing with painkillers--and so, the exercise was not a total waste of time for the Jews. They got their "pound of flesh." Shame on them all!
But, hardly anyone even knows about any of the autopsies--even today. Surely, the German defendants would have been extremely interested--but they were deliberately kept in the dark. Shame, shame, shame on America, once again! The truth would, at the very least, have cast serious doubt about Nazi guilt. Today, such suppression of "evidence" helpful to any defendant by a prosecutor would be condemned--and rightly so.
But why even bother with autopsies when the prosecutors had an abundance of "eyewitnesses"(mostly Jews, of course) and even "confessions" (acquired with torture) from prominent Germans? Why nit-pick? Well, some must have been thinking as Eisenhower did that a time might come when people would actually question the given horror tales. For such a time, "real evidence" might be necessary. "Eyewitnesses," especially Jewish eyewitnesses, often lie and sane people know that. Just ask any insurance adjustor. Jewish "eyewitnesses" have a well deserved reputation for precisely that--especially when the lies can be so rewarding. After all, that is their religion. Judaism is a pack of racist, hate-driven lies from the very beginning--with no end in sight. To condemn Jews for lying is "anti-Semitic"--and we must not have any of that. "Hate speech" is reserved only for Jews. The holocaust is "hate speech"--but protected by many governments including the German government.
Today, whenever I am confronted by another holocaust-believing idiot, I try to cut to the chase and simply ask "what about the autopsies?" Invariably, the holocaust-believers do not even know there were autopsies, any at all--and then I begin to educate them. Autopsies at the time were already a well-established part of real forensic investigations, not some new-fangled technology like DNA research. Newer methods available today could reveal so much about ALL of the alleged mass extrermination sites, even Babi Yar--if the respective governments are ever interested. They seem to be so afraid of what they might really find.
The bright cherry red skin coloration of corpses of CO and cyanide gassing victims should have made them easy enough to find--even many days after the individuals had been killed. So, how may autopsies were actually made? Surely, any number of ambitious medical officers would have jumped at the chances to provide "proof" of Nazi gassings. Their careers would have soared.
Color photos of victims of the camps at the end of the war were made as the following link shows:
https://www.google.com/search?q=holocaust+color+photos&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihyY6ZrP_VAhVC4GMKHY1LCGUQ_AUICigB&biw=960&bih=462&dpr=2
However, when one looks at color photos of corpses in the camps, none of them show any "RED." Just imagine if Hollywood greats like Alfred Hitchcock or George Stevens who were both there had found such RED corpses. Many thanks to George Stevens for the following video in color:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3j9e6
Aside from the usual lies and falsehoods in the commentary for the video, the vast majority of former prisoners look every bit as healthy as the Germans. No wonder this film is NOT shown more often. The GIs shown at the beginning of the video were apparently trying to determine whether the young German in front of them was SS so that they could murder him as well. Shame on America! Shame on "the greatest generation!"
Another video gives some info about autopsies:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4jqsvb
At 10 mins and 55 seconds into the video the narrator tells us that "70% of all autopsies show tuberculosis." This suggests that autopsies were rather common but, once again, none showed death by poison gas. A youtube version of the same video is at:
Even if there were some merit to concerns that the Bright Cherry Red coloring of corpses took hours to fully appear--that would still have left many hours, days, even weeks perhaps, for passersby to see those stunning Bright Cherry Red corpses. Some accounts even claimed the corpses were stacked in huge piles prior to open air cremation or burial.
So where are "eyewitnesses" who saw any Bright Cherry Red at all?? How could they have missed the spectacle? The fact is there are no such "eyewitness" accounts; that undercuts the credibility of tyhe entire tale we have been given. Except for eyewinesses, the hoaxers have practically nothing--not even a plausible theory.
To sum up everything, here are four simple questions for holocaust hoax believers:
1) How do you explain the autopsies?
2) How do you explain the colour videos and color photographs that totally fail to show any RED coloring of the many thousands of corpses in the camps?
3) How do you explain the "eyewitness" acounts which totally fail to even mention any RED coloring of corpses in the camps--especially the AR camps?
4) How do you explain the fact that the Soviets in late 1943 had no trouble finding "pale pink or bright cherry" RED corpses, supposedly, from the alleged German use of homicidal gas vans--but for ALL of the alleged extermination camps, no one except Henryk Tauber saw any such coloring at all. Tauber's testimony appears in Pressac at: http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/pressac/technique-and-operation/pressac0489.shtml
"We found heaps of naked bodies, doubled up. They were pinkish, and in places red. Some were covered with greenish marks and saliva ran from their mouths. Others were bleeding from the nose."
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at: http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
There were NO “limited gassings!” There were NO homicidal Nazi Gassings at all!
http://www.nazigassings.com/Railroad.html
The REAL Mass Murderers were the Anglo-Americans and the Jews themselves!
