Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Hans
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Hans » Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:38 am

Fritz, I have already rebutted your points, just read the thread again.



User avatar
Friedrich Paul Berg
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:21 am
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Friedrich Paul Berg » Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:49 pm

Does Hans have the German text from the "eyewitnesses" and or drivers?

FPBerg

Frankie
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:39 am
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Frankie » Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:34 pm

Hans wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:13 pm
Another nail into the Revisionist Diesel coffin:

German Document on Chelmno Gas Van Driver Filling up Gasoline in Lodz
Per Hans' ridiculous link we see 'gas vans' claims that stem from an alleged license no. that was allegedly linked to another guy's no. who supposedly drove an absurd 'gas van' that there is no proof of in the first place. Yep, that's "Holocau$t" logic alright. :lol:

Another blockbuster from CODOH. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
http://codoh.com/library/document/3276
Gas Van Film and Photo Fraud
German News Magazine and Simon Wiesenthal Center's Museum Caught Faking Photo and Film Captions

Only desperate liars use fake photos.

Werd
Posts: 9001
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Werd » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:38 pm

Frankie wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:34 pm
Hans wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:13 pm
Another nail into the Revisionist Diesel coffin:

German Document on Chelmno Gas Van Driver Filling up Gasoline in Lodz
Per Hans' ridiculous link we see 'gas vans' claims that stem from an alleged license no. that was allegedly linked to another guy's no. who supposedly drove an absurd 'gas van' that there is no proof of in the first place. Yep, that's "Holocau$t" logic alright. :lol:

Another blockbuster from CODOH. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
http://codoh.com/library/document/3276
Gas Van Film and Photo Fraud
German News Magazine and Simon Wiesenthal Center's Museum Caught Faking Photo and Film Captions

Only desperate liars use fake photos.
Good point, Hannover.

Frankie
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:39 am
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Frankie » Thu Feb 22, 2018 3:55 am

I insist that the moderator here stop members like Werd from calling other members by different names than those they registered.
I am not the 'Hannover' that so many here obsess over. He does rock though.

Werd
Posts: 9001
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:38 am
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Werd » Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:55 am

How about you answer my question first and stop dodging like a guilty person might after revealing too much by accident? :lol:
viewtopic.php?p=121583#p121583
viewtopic.php?p=121388#p121388

User avatar
NSDAP
Posts: 2532
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 5:33 am
Location: München, Deutschland

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by NSDAP » Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:24 am

Werd wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:55 am
Can we discuss the topic of the debate without these constant distractions. Or as a personal discussion are we not expected to reply, or discuss. If this is so then why is it posted on a relatively public forum? I am quite interested in the gas van issue due to its potential credibility.
Wenn wir die Flagge, die wir aus dem Nichts gerissen haben, nicht halten können, müssen Sie, meine Söhne und Töchter, greifendie Fahne in deiner Faust...Führer der NSDAP Adolf Hitler
𝕹𝕾𝕯𝕬𝕻

User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
Posts: 2238
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 am
Location: USA, West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: Hans (only) v FP Berg (only). The (informal) gas van debate.

Post by Scott » Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:48 am

NSDAP wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:24 am
Werd wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:55 am
Can we discuss the topic of the debate without these constant distractions. Or as a personal discussion are we not expected to reply, or discuss. If this is so then why is it posted on a relatively public forum? I am quite interested in the gas van issue due to its potential credibility.


FYI for all posters.

You can start a new Gas-Van thread if you want, but this one is reserved for Hans and Fritz debating the subject.

If you are not Hans or Fritz and want to discuss this Hans & Fritz Gas-Van debate, then do post in this thread, which was created for that purpose:

COMMENTARY - Hans vs Friedrich debate!

I unstickied it a while back to make some room and un-clutter the board a little.

:)

“Now we have forced Hitler to war so he no longer can peacefully annihilate one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after the other.”
~ Major General J.F.C. Fuller,
historian – England

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests