Replies submitted to CODOH

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Lily
Posts: 741
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Lily » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:37 pm

Great!
BROI brings evidence which refutes Nessie's silliness and Nessie praises him. :lol:

So called "holocaust eyewitnesses" making absurd, impossible, and contradictory claims is not the exception, but the rule.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the laughable 'holocaust' storyline is the message.

visit the CODOH Revisionist Forum
https://forum.codoh.com

[edited to add missing url tags - BuSV]

Pa Gromheizer
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Pa Gromheizer » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:02 pm

Nessie wrote:
Pa Gromheizer wrote:.....
I keep pondering why Caroling Sturdy Colls never published results from a testing lab and she didn't use GPR. Is it possible she is a shill for the industry?
Testing for what? Human remains? We know that anyway from the more complete remains found at the site and the history of the camp. Staffs Uni did use GPR at TII.
The usual and customary is to take core samples and compare with GPR data. Does Staffordshire U have evidence not disclosed? If so, why are they keeping it close to the chest. Could it be they don't want to suffer the embarrassment dealt out to the Smithsonian?

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 27677
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Nessie » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:03 pm

Lily wrote:Great!
BROI brings evidence which refutes Nessie's silliness and Nessie praises him. :lol:
What evidence are you referring to?
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 27677
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Nessie » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:05 pm

Pa Gromheizer wrote: The usual and customary is to take core samples and compare with GPR data.
Is it? Can you show that with evidence?
Pa Gromheizer wrote: Does Staffordshire U have evidence not disclosed? If so, why are they keeping it close to the chest. Could it be they don't want to suffer the embarrassment dealt out to the Smithsonian?
Could it be that you keep asking me instead of posing your questions to those who have the answers? Sitting at the sideline firing questions is dead easy. Please do some work.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Pa Gromheizer
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Pa Gromheizer » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:23 pm

Charles Traynor wrote: Stop pleading ignorance, Nessie. You were made aware of the laboratory testing of samples taken by CSC at Treblinka a long time ago.


Why have those test results been suppressed by the forces of exterminationism?
http://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... 841#p69841

Wow. This is news to me Fast Fourier Transform and atomic spectroscopy! Those results will separate the boys from the men. Or, in this case, the girl from the discipline of archeology. Where is Indiana Jones when you need him?

Samples were from the Christian cemetery, indeed. :shock:

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 27677
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Nessie » Tue Sep 20, 2016 9:34 pm

https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f ... =15#p80131
Hektor wrote:........
Could it be that an excavator at a quarry was just digging out sand and gravel?

Or do we have to use Holocaustian Eiegesis on everything?
No. The photos were taken on flat land...

Image

...where the stockpiles are high enough to obscure the nearby trees...

Image

...and on a level with a nearby building...

Image

http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/excavators2.html

They are not working in a quarry. What they are doing is consistent with the layer of sand that covers TII and was above the building foundations uncovered by the Staffs Uni dig

http://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/archaeology/p ... tion-camp/

"Deep sand and rubble deposits were identified in specific areas of the site."
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 6795
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Turnagain » Tue Sep 20, 2016 10:08 pm

Your first two photos clearly show that the draglines are working below grade. Besides, all quarries begin with excavating from grade. You can't begin from excavating at the bottom. That's asinine.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 27677
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Nessie » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:46 am

Atigun wrote:No, the first two photos are the same, just taken from a slightly different camera position and they both show the dragline working below grade. Grade can be seen in the background with the horse and the man. Neither does the photo of the dragline with a building in the background prove that it's anywhere but at Treblinka I. Quarries are begun at the surface and dug deeper as material is removed, not the other way around.
An aerial photo of TII from September 1944, with trees and buildings next to where the ground has been levelled with brightly coloured material and parts planted over.

Image

http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/maps.html

The narrative is that the camp was covered over with a layer of sand, as referred to by the Staffs Uni dig, hence the excavators are just below the new ground level as they spread the sand.

Quarries do begin from the surface, at Treblinka that started before the Nazis built the camps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treblinka ... rianik2011

(Original source in Polish)

"Before World War II, it was the site of a gravel mining enterprise for the production of concrete, connected to most of the major cities in central Poland by the Małkinia–Sokołów Podlaski railway junction and the Treblinka village station. The mine was owned and operated by the Polish industrialist Marian Łopuszyński, who added the new 6-kilometre (3.7 mi) railway track to the existing line.[39] When the German SS took over Treblinka I, the quarry was already equipped with heavy machinery that was ready to use.[40]"
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 6795
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Turnagain » Wed Sep 21, 2016 10:04 am

No, the angle of the photo shows that the first two draglines are working below grade. You're full of more excrement than a Christmas goose, Nessie.

Almost forgot, when compacted soil is excavated, it adds volume. That's known as the "gain" or the "fluff." It accounts for an increase in volume of 10-20%. If your mysterious machine excavator had dug those giant mass graves, there would have been somewhere between 7,000 and 14,000 cubic meters of sand at the T-II site. What happened to all that extra material, Nessie? Don't forget the ~1,400 cubic meters of cremains, either.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 27677
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Replies submitted to CODOH

Post by Nessie » Sat Sep 24, 2016 8:06 pm

https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f ... =30#p80206
HeiligeSturm wrote:......
Have you ever been in or even seen a quarry?
This is the way quarries get started. By excavation on high or flat land! :shock:
The quarry existed before the start of the war, as did the railway spur to it, as shown on this 1936 map from IH.

Image

......
HeiligeSturm wrote:.Are you hinting that the evil Germans are digging next to a gas chamber?
Or what do you think that "nearby building" is?
Have you heard of barracks where workers eat their food and/or drink coffee?
No, it must be something more evil. There's some kind of gate next to the building...
Industrial areas have always been notorious for not having fences and gates around 'em. Or was it the other way around? :wink:
The background buildings are what were left at the site, as seen in the 1944 areal photo I have previously shown.
HeiligeSturm wrote:.
Nessie.. wrote:They are not working in a quarry.
Why not? Oh yeah, they must have been digging mass graves for the (900 000) gassed victims.
No.
HeiligeSturm wrote:.These artifacts belonging probably to an SS-man also prove that something sinister must have happened in Treblinka.
Image
Was this evil German killed by the Soviets or the (most likely Jewish) inmates? In the legendary revolt?
Or was he just a deserter as metal gorget was usually a distinguishing mark of the duty.
Abandoning his water bottle, he must have died of thirst...
Similar artifacts:ImageImage
Image
No idea.
HeiligeSturm wrote:.
There's also a question about Treblinka excavator photos: who actually took those photos?
Was it really the Germans?
After all, in the so called Aktion Reinhardt Oath of Secrery is stated:
"4. über ein ausdrückliches Photografier-Verbot in den Lagern des 'Einsatzes Reinhardt'"
"4. that there is an absolute prohibition on photography in the camps of 'Einsatz Reinhardt'"
They were taken by Kurt Franz and they were once the camp had been razed to the ground. The men in the photos are not Jewish prisoners, they are the last Germans or Ukrainians in uniform finishing off at the camp.
HeiligeSturm wrote:.In the end, you can make so much allusions (and accusations) as you want but it really doesn't prove anything.
I prefer evidencing.
HeiligeSturm wrote:.
And regarding the "exhumation" by Staffordshire University's The Centre of Archaeology,
there quite a few revealing scenes in Treblinka: Inside Hitler’s Secret Death Camp / Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine.
One of the best scenes is this conversation:
Michael Schudrich, the Chief Rabbi of Poland: "If you actually find a mass grave, you have to stop."
Caroline Sturdy Colls: "Yes, of course."

If she actually finds a mass grave, she has to stop. What kind of logic is that?
She went there to find alleged mass graves! And this is supposed to be scientific and forensic exhumation.
The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax truly does great job showing how incompetent and staged these "forensic exhumations" are.
They Jewish authorities asked that no mass grave be completely excavated. My preference is that they are. Staffs Uni decided to respect the Rabbbi's wishes.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests