I am not absolutely certain that Leuchter actually wrote any of that--but Fredrick Toben says he did. The second sentence already strikes me as weird and stupid. "Fritz is not qualified to question me on execution hardware or methods because he is not my peer" Really? Why not? What "qualifications" do I or does anyone have to have to "q-u-e-s-t-i-o-n" Fred Leuchter? Who anointed him? Is he trying to silence me? Is Leuchter a bigot? WOW!Since my work supported Faurisson, Zündel, yourself and many others too numerous to name, the attack is essentially against me. Fritz is not qualified to question me on execution hardware or methods because he is not my peer. I accept criticism from expert Chemists because Chemistry is not my field.
By the same token Execution hardware and methods are not his field. The Federal Court system of the United States, the District Court of Toronto, Canada and the Federal Court System of Germany at Nuremberg[??] have all Certified me as an "Expert of Execution Technology" and to my knowledge none other has been so Certified, anywhere. Even an Academician should recognize I am without peer.
Differences in Chemistry, nothwithstanding, do not affect my expertise in my field.
We must continue to present this argument to the nay-sayers. I have no intention to debate this issue with Fritz, Mark Weber or David Irving, and I have never been apprised by any of them that they would like to debate with me. They have their opinions, which are personal. I have mine, which is Professional.
I hope you, or anyone else would not consider me to be self absorbed, because I am not. Since my work as a Court Appointed Expert, I have stayed out of the fray. I have attempted on numerous occasions to mediate between various factions of Revisionism, to no avail. I am still on speaking terms with everyone, I think! I believe we need to inform the opposition that they need to find another Qualified and Certified "Expert of Execution Technology" before they can make an argument for the other side.
I understand that the Holocaust supporters view the "Holocaust" as a religion and belief and follow its Dogma.
No Revisionist follows Revisionism as a Religion. I respect everyone involved for their Reputations, their work and their personal opinions. I believe they respect me in the way as fellow Revisionists
If Leuchter did write what Toben attributes to him, then Leuchter should climb down from his lofty pedestal and smell the real world, flowers, internet and all the rest. Not only do I "q-u-e-s-t-i-o-n" things Leuchter has claimed regarding "execution hardware or methods," I have actually r-e-f-u-t-e-d some of his nonsense in the past. For example, Leuchter's alleged need for explosion-proof light switches or electric switches in any cyanide gas chamber is refuted by the fact that cyanide in air can only b-e-g-i-n to burn if the cyanide concentration in air is more than 5.6%--in other words, far above the concentrations needed for executions. Nowhere in any of the extensive German or English-language literature on fumigation gas chambers is there any mention of explosion-proof switches. The American Cyanimid company which was the US distributor of Zyklon-B for many decades actually recommended that stoves should be lit in adjoining rooms to help warm the air in the rooms which were being fumigated. The danger that a crematory oven adjoining a gas chamber room might cause an explosion was minimal, at worst. With that, one of Faurisson's overused but false arguments becomes worthless.
Has Fred Leuchter ever witnessed an actual gas execution of anyone? When I last spoke to Leuchter about twenty years ago, he had not. .What does the corpse look like afterward? What colors does it display, if any?
At about the time of the Zuendel trials, I remember Leuchter insisting that cyanide gas executions were "quick and painless, if they were done right"--no doubt, with the help of a highly qualified "professional" such as himself. He neglected to ever mention, as far as I know, that gas executions could ONLY be "quick" if the prisoner cooperated wholeheartedly in his own execution by inhaling deeply as soon as the rising gas cloud rose to his nostrils. Otherwise, the execution was more than llikely to be a horror show for the eyewitnesses as well as for the unfortunate prisoner. Were masses of Jews ever likely to cooperate in their own mass executions? Of course, not! An important counterargument to the holocaust hoax was absent until I made the argument many years later.. Over the last two decades, nearly all, if not all, American states have abandoned gas executions--no doubt, as a belated response to overwhelming evidence that gas executions are far from "quick or painless"--and that they were indeed a form of cruel and unusual punishment--and that Fred Leuchter and other self-described "experts" were wrong.
If Leuchter and/or Toben are ever brave enough to DEBATE me on radio, I am sure it can be arranged with minimal inconvenience through a Skype connection and only about two hours of their time near any computer. After all I have said here, I must also add that Leuchter has contributed enormously to the destruction of the holocaust hoax--but his work was not decisive at all. Much more information has become available, check my website and others. "New information and evidence"--contrary to Toben's stupid assertions--is coming to light in discussion forums such as RODOH and CODOH and elsewhere nearly every day.
To innocent bystanders to these emails, please let me know what you really think.
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at http://www.nazigassings.com
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!
There were NO "limited gassings." There were NO homicidal Nazi gassings at all!
http://www.nazigassings.com/Railroad.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Fredrick Toben
Sent: Aug 25, 2014 5:55 PM
To: 'Friedrich Paul Berg' , [email protected]
Cc:
Fritz, you are repeating yourself – and I shall again repeat myself by stating that when you have something new to offer Revisionism, please let me know.
By the way, The Leuchter Report is still a pioneering work that shook the world, and your commentary is worthless on this matter.
I think Fred Leuchter puts an interesting view in the following:
So, Fritz, if you have anything new to offer, don’t hesitate to write to me.>>Since my work supported Faurisson, Zündel, yourself and many others too numerous to name, the attack is essentially against me. Fritz is not qualified to question me on execution hardware or methods because he is not my peer. I accept criticism from expert Chemists because Chemistry is not my field.
By the same token Execution hardware and methods are not his field. The Federal Court system of the United States, the District Court of Toronto, Canada and the Federal Court System of Germany at Nuremberg have all Certified me as an "Expert of Execution Technology" and to my knowledge none other has been so Certified, anywhere. Even an Academician should recognize I am without peer.
Differences in Chemistry, nothwithstanding, do not affect my expertise in my field.
We must continue to present this argument to the nay-sayers. I have no intention to debate this issue with Fritz, Mark Weber or David Irving, and I have never been apprised by any of them that they would like to debate with me. They have their opinions, which are personal. I have mine, which is Professional.
I hope you, or anyone else would not consider me to be self absorbed, because I am not. Since my work as a Court Appointed Expert, I have stayed out of the fray. I have attempted on numerous occasions to mediate between various factions of Revisionism, to no avail. I am still on speaking terms with everyone, I think! I believe we need to inform the opposition that they need to find another Qualified and Certified "Expert of Execution Technology" before they can make an argument for the other side.
I understand that the Holocaust supporters view the "Holocaust" as a religion and belief and follow its Dogma.
No Revisionist follows Revisionism as a Religion. I respect everyone involved for their Reputations, their work and their personal opinions. I believe they respect me in the way as fellow Revisionists.<<
Best wishes.
Fredrick Toben
