‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
Here is some news that I only saw today.
Presumably that being because main-stream media in Europe isn't covering it?

It's about a series of mysterious explosions in Iran since June which Israel and its zionist Jewish world-wide network are accused of being behind.

The speculation is that world Jewry wants to provoke a response from Iran while Donald Trump is still President so that they can start a war between America and Iran.
Image

...a series of mysterious explosions... rocked military and industrial facilities in different parts of the country.

The most critical incident took place in the Natanz nuclear facility on July 2. An advanced centrifuge assembly center was destroyed as a result of a fairly large explosion. Iranian authorities are currently investigating the incident.

Some recent reports suggested that Israel may be behind some of the recent explosions in Iran, especially Natanz explosion. Nevertheless, there is no evidence to support these accusations.

The possibility of foreign involvement in these incidents is taken seriously by Iran. Tehran is apparently taking defensive measures to address any possible threat, including aerial attacks.

https://southfront.org/iran-put-it-air- ... nn-report/
But curiously most of these reports suggesting Israel is behind the explosions come from Jewish journalists???
E.g. see here.
That is from Ilan Goldenberg described as a "Senior Fellow and Director, Middle East Security Program".
In that article he refers by name to “a Middle Eastern official — believed to be the head of Israeli intelligence, Yossi Cohen — [who] told the Jew York Times last week that Israel had detonated a bomb.”
But Yossi Cohen is not only "believed to be" that?! :o
Image
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) and Mossad chief Yossi Cohen at a press conference at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem, October 15, 2015.

...Cohen has been mentioned as a possible successor to Netanyahu.
...Cohen is considered a close adviser and confidant to Netanyahu, who pulled him from the Mossad’s ranks in 2013 to appoint him national security adviser. Cohen succeeded Tamir Pardo as head of the Mossad in January 2016.

...An Israeli TV report Friday night said that Israel was bracing for a possible Iranian retaliation as officials in Tehran suggested that a mystery fire and explosion at the Natanz nuclear facility the day before could have been caused by an Israeli cyberattack.


https://www.timesofisrael.com/liberman- ... n-attacks/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 8459
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by Huntinger »

BT what I am interested in but not enough time to fully research is about der Jüdisch people with real talent: are they up there on their own merits or are others bypassed to that their rise to fame is somewhat channelized. If so this would imply corruption. I often wonder how much der jüdisch media plays in such matters. I often wonder if the McCarthy hearings were more about jüdischer Bolschewismus than communism.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Huntinger wrote:
Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:03 am
BT what I am interested in but not enough time to fully research is about der Jüdisch people with real talent: are they up there on their own merits or are others bypassed to that their rise to fame is somewhat channelized. If so this would imply corruption. I often wonder how much der jüdisch media plays in such matters. I often wonder if the McCarthy hearings were more about jüdischer Bolschewismus than communism.
It would appear that in addition to nepotism, many Jews run a sort of 'old-boys' network. I.e. they look out for each other and given a choice between two equally qualified candidates for a position at a University, or a job will choose the fellow-Jew.

More than this, the example of Rupert Maxwell shows how an ambitious and scrupulous Jew will not only be offered options which a goy will not get, but Jews will conspire to cheat, defraud and destroy goy competitors for their mutual advantage.

Here is an example of how the Sassoons moved from dominating business in Baghdad to doing the same in China in the late 1800's. They got rich off the opium trade... and the Jews narrating the story are proud of it:
The Sassoons were the first to make the move from Baghdad to Shanghai, Kaufman emphasizes. The moment David Sassoon settled in the city, in the 1840s, he created a local Jewish community from scratch, becoming a one-man immigrant absorption ministry.
Kaufman: “David Sassoon not only sets up schools but he tells the parents back in Baghdad, ‘Send your children to me, your teenagers, I’ll educate them, I’ll make sure they have a synagogue to go to, if they get sick, I have a hospital they can go to, if they die I’ll make sure they get a Jewish burial.’ It’s a good business move.”
Indeed, a steady stream of young Jews were sent by their families in Iraq to work in Sassoon’s enterprises. The Sassoons even brought ritual slaughterers to Shanghai, to teach Chinese butchers koshering techniques so there would be food available for the family’s employees. Indeed, because initially all the Jews who arrived in Shanghai worked for him, the Chinese word for Jewish workers was “Sassoons.”
In addition to creating an organized community for them, employing Jews from Baghdad paid off for the Sassoon family, as it helped them preserve trade secrets in a highly competitive milieu. At the time, the Sassoons wrote in Judeo-Arabic, Kaufman notes – a language that few non-Jews and other Jews in the world knew, akin to a “secret code” with which they could communicate confidentially among themselves and with their employees.

https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-new ... yTxa2FkY9w
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

By Gilad Atzmon

Source: https://www.unz.com/gatzmon/the-last-zionist/

In his book Memories, the first Israeli PM and pragmatic early Zionist, David Ben Gurion writes about his early years in Płońsk, Poland.
“For many of us, anti-Semitic feeling had little to do with our (Zionist) dedication. I personally never suffered anti-Semitic persecution. Płońsk was remarkably free of it… There were three main communities: Russians, Jews and Poles. … The number of Jews and Poles in the city were roughly equal, about five thousand each. The Jews, however, formed a compact, centralized group occupying the innermost districts whilst the Poles were more scattered, living in outlying areas and shading off into the peasantry. Consequently, when a gang of Jewish boys met a Polish gang the latter would almost inevitably represent a single suburb and thus be poorer in fighting potential than the Jews who even if their numbers were initially fewer could quickly call on reinforcements from the entire quarter. Far from being afraid of them (the goyim), they were rather afraid of us (the Jews). In general, however, relations were amicable, though distant.”
(Memoirs: David Ben-Gurion (1970), p. 36)
Ben Gurion is very explicit when describing the balance of power between Jews and Poles in his town in the early days of the 20th century. “Far from being afraid of them, they were rather afraid of us (the Jews).”

Jews were indeed very powerful in Poland in the first years of the 20th century. The Jewish socialist party, the Bund, was a leading political force in the 1905 Revolution particularly in the Polish areas of the Russian empire. In the early stages of that Revolution, the Bund’s military wing was the strongest revolutionary force in Western Russia.

The Vow, the Bund’s anthem didn’t leave much room for imagination, it declared war and practically sentenced to death those who didn’t fit with their political agenda:

“We swear our stalwart hate persists,
Of those who rob and kill the poor:
The Tsar, the masters, capitalists.
Our vengeance will be swift and sure.
So swear together to live or die!”

“To wage the holy war we vow,
Until right triumphs over wrong.
No Midas, master, noble now –
The humble equal to the strong.
So swear together to live or die!”


The Bund was extremely confident of its power. In the autumn of 1933 it issued a call to the Polish public to boycott goods from Germany in protest of Hitler and the NSDAP. In December 1938 and January 1939, in the last Polish municipal elections before the start of WWII, the Bund received the largest segment of the Jewish vote. In 89 towns, one-third elected Bund majorities. In Warsaw, the Bund won 61.7% of the votes cast for Jewish parties, taking 17 of the 20 municipal council seats won by Jewish parties. In Łódź the Bund won 57.4% (11 of 17 seats won by Jewish parties).

We now know that this sense of victorious Jewish empowerment ended shortly after these elections. The East European and Polish Jewish communities suffered greatly during WWII. The Bund was completely wiped out during the war. For one reason or another and, as problematic as it may be for some, at least in the early stages of the war, some Poles, Ukrainians and other East European nationalists saw the Nazis as their ‘liberators’. They apparently weren’t blind to the reality that was depicted by Ben Gurion.

This sense of Jewish political and social empowerment that is portrayed in Ben Gurion’s Memoires and in the story of the Bund created a problematic pattern, as it clearly led to some tragic consequences.

In his conclusive work on ‘the Holocaust’, Jewish historian David Cesarani delved briefly into the work of the CV, (Centralverein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens – the central association of German citizens of the Jewish faith).

It would be a crude act of denial to fail to see the overwhelming similarity between the CV that was formed in 1893 and the likes of the ADL, SPLC, CRIF, the BOD and the CAA writes about the CV that it was formed “to combat the lies propagated by anti-Semites and oppose them when they stood for election.” Clearly, Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders and Cynthia McKinney weren’t the first politicians to be targeted by dedicated Jewish pressure groups. The CV was using the same tactics over a century ago.

Cesarani continues: “over the next two decades, the CV proved quite effective: suing rabble rousers for defamation, funding candidates pledged to contest anti-Semitism, producing voluminous amounts of educational material about Judaism and Jewish life, and coordinating the activity of sympathetic non-Jews ashamed of prejudice within their communities.”
(Final Solution: The Fate of the Jews 1933-1949, David Cesarani pg.10)

Like the ADL and AIPAC in the USA, and the CAA in Britain, the CV saw its popularity amongst Jews grow rapidly. By 1926 more than 60.000 German Jews were amongst its members, however, there is a good reason to believe that the more popular the CV was amongst Jews, the less popular Jews and their politics were to Germans. We can observe that the ADL and CAA are not marching in virgin territory, there is historical documentation that points out that abrasive Jewish pressure politics have, in the past, helped lead to catastrophic consequences.

The Jewish Virtual Library produces a fascinating glimpse into the CV’s activity. In 1934 when the Nazi Party was already in power, the Party made no attempt to conceal its anti Jewish sentiments, yet, the CV, apparently in a state of complete denial, ignored the political shift in Germany and continued to pursue its pressure politics.

Following is a report by the CV from 26 April 1934:
To the Regional branches:
Central Germany
Rheinland—Westfalia
Northern Germany
Hessen
Eastern Westfalia

Friends from small and middle sized towns have recently complained that songs with coarse anti-Jewish texts are being sung brazenly and provocatively. We intend to officially approach the Reich Ministry and report all these incidents and to address a letter of the board to the SA Chief and Reich Minister Roehm and to the Prussian Secret State Police. A representative of the CV will also raise this matter with the Propaganda Ministry. We therefore ask to report as soon as possible, in what localities such songs are being sung. What songs are being sung. Who is doing the singing.
(signed) Rubenstein.”
This type of a letter is familiar in its format and content from both ADL and CAApress releases targeting popular artists, musicians and politicians.

The point I am trying to make should be obvious. Harassing, terrorising and abusing one’s host nation into submission may produce some results in the short term, however, in the long run, it may not be the best way to fight anti Jewish sentiments. As Jewish history in general and the holocaust in particular prove, it may be the most dangerous path Jews can take.

‘History,’ we are told, ‘never repeats itself.’ Yet, for one reason or another, we are all expected to draw the right lessons from Jewish history. We are to vow ‘never again.’ We are to pledge to fight racism and discrimination.

Most surprising then, that the Jews, at large, never learn from their own past. One wonders, what is it about the ADL, AIPAC, BOD, Crif, CAA and other Jewish organisations that set them on a political path that has proven to be catastrophic?

One possible answer is collective ignorance. It is reasonable to assume that many Jews do not know or understand their own history and instead concentrate, if at all, on Jewish suffering (the holocaust, the inquisition, rise in Antisemitism, pogroms, etc.) rather than attempting to grasp the chain of events that led to such unfortunate consequences. In other words, they fail to see the connection between bad behaviour and antisemitism. This may imply that if things, God forbid, turn sour for American Jewry tomorrow, Jews in the future will not examine the multiple disastrous headlines associated with some prominent American Jews and leading Jewish institutions. Accordingly, they will not see the negative impact of the bad behaviour of such characters as Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell , Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, Harvey Weinstein or George Soros. They will not see the need to examine, let alone explain, the vast over-representation of Jews on NYC’s slumlord list or in America’s worst Ponzi schemes. Jews won’t look into the negative impact of the ADL or the SPLC. Nor will they dare dig into the disastrous impact of Israel and AIPAC on American Foreign Policy.
Jews won’t look into these for the same reasons that Jews work hard to prevent everyone, Jews included, from understanding the role of Jews and Jewish institutions in contributing to antisemitism in the Weimar republic or in 19th century Eastern Europe.

Another possible answer is that Jewish political institutions are very sophisticated and far more strategic than we are willing to admit. Perhaps The ADL, the CAA, AIPAC and other Jewish pressure groups actually fully understand Jewish history. They do understand the possible dangerous implications of their actions. However they genuinely believe that constant tension between Jews and their host nations is actually ‘good for the Jews.’ How could it be good for the Jews? It prevents assimilation and unnecessary intermingling. It enforces Jewish identification, it evidently reinforces the importance of Israel and promotes Jewish immigration to and support for the Jewish State.

Another possible answer is more fatalistic. In this Jews do not follow a ‘strategic plan’, nor they are ‘blind to their past.’ They simply can’t do much about their destiny as they are shaped individually and collectively by a unique and persistent tribal cultural-spiritual paradigm. It is this tribal precept that sustains their clannish and exclusionist behavioural mode and also their affinity to biological determinist views.

I guess that it is this last answer that led to the birth of Zionist thought in the late 19th century. Zionism accepted that Jewish diaspora culture and attitude was deeply unhealthy. Early Zionists agreed amongst themselves that it is Jews and their cultural code, rather than the so-called ‘antisemites’ who bring disasters on the Jews. Zionism vowed to ‘civilise’ the Jews by means of a ‘homecoming’. It promised to make them “people like all other people.”

Theodor Herzl (1860 –1904) the author of political Zionism — who is regarded by Jews and Israelis as Zionism’s forefather — didn’t pull his punches in his attitude to Diaspora Jewry:

“The wealthy Jews control the world.
In their hands lies the fate of governments and nations.
They set governments one against the other.
When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance.
One way or the other, they get rich.”


This quote from Theodor Herzl, appetas in Deutsche Zeitung at 4:47 in the following Hebrew video:
https://youtu.be/eB7tr0MBTjA?t=286

Herzl didn’t refer to AIPAC, ADL, Soros or the CAA. He didn’t know about Corbyn, Dershowitz, Sanders or Epstein and his Lolita Express’ long list of passengers. Yet Herzl managed to identify a very problematic Jewish identitarian pattern which he pledged to alter by means of a ‘Zionist metamorphosis.’

A prime Labour Zionist ideologist, A.D. Gordon (1856 –1922) referred to his brethren as ‘a parasitic people’ who have “no roots in the soil”. Like Herzl, Gordon also believed that Jews could be re-invented and become proletarians.

Dov Ber Borochov (1881-1917), the leading theoretical Jewish Marxist ideologist who inspired Labour Zionism, was also disgusted by Jewish Diaspora parasitic tendencies. “The enterprising spirit of the Jew is irrepressible. He refuses to remain a proletarian. He will grab at the first opportunity to advance to a higher rung in the social ladder.”
(The Economic Development of the Jewish People, Ber Borochov, 1916).


Maybe it is time to admit that early Zionism was a unique and profound instant in Jewish history. It was the only moment in time when Jews were brave enough to look in the mirror and to admit that they were repulsed by what they saw. A similar sense of self-loathing can be detected in sermons of the Biblical prophets, but early Zionism evolved into a powerful Jewish movement. By means of self-loathing it managed to achieve its objectives. It fulfilled its promise to establish a Jewish National homeland in Palestine, even if It did so at the expense of the Palestinian people whose land it plundered. On the face of it, Zionism made the Jews people like all other people, failing to see that all other people weren’t trying to be like all other people but were like themselves.

The first Israelis bought into the ideas of Herzl, Gordon and Borochov. They believed in the possibility of Jewish metamorphosis. But it didn’t take long before the Zionists realised that for Jewishness to survive, Goyim are needed. Why? Because Jewishness is basically different manifestations of choseness, and choseness cannot operate in a vacuum for the same reason that progressives need ‘reactionaries,’ and supremacists need people to look down upon. It didn’t take long for the early Zionists to make the Palestinians and Arabs their new Goyim. It didn’t take more than a few decades for Israeli Jews to give up completely on the dream of a new Hebraic civilisation. By the 1990s Benjamin Netanyahu realised that it was Jewishness that united the Israelis. Israel under his leadership drifted rapidly from the Zionist dream. It morphed safely into a ‘Jewish State.’

On a personal note I admit that, like many of my peers, in my early years I bought into the Zionist ethos. I fell in love with the idea of a Jewish nationalist rebirth. It was pretty convenient to see the Biblical kings and prophets as my ‘ancestors.’ My understanding of the Zionist revolutionary impetus was reinforced when I toured around the world as a young musician playing Jewish music in diaspora communities. I realised that I shared very little or nothing at all with those Diaspora Jews and their cultural/political ethos. I guess that I took the Zionist dream very seriously, I vowed to become a nice, ethical human being. By the time my project was more or less accomplished, I gathered that I, as a nice adult, was basically an ordinary goy like all other goyim, I was a Jew no more.

The absurdity here is that together with just a few others including: Uri Avnery, Gideon Levy, Israel Shamir, Israel Shachak, Shlomo Sand, I am probably amongst the last of the Zionists. I guess that we are the few who managed to unshackle themselves, to break out of the ghetto walls and to cross the rough sea between Jerusalem and Athens.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 19

Post by been-there »

.
BLAST FROM THE PAST

Here is a British file of a confidential note communicated by the Central Polish Agency concerning German-Jewish aspirations for Germany made towards the end of WW1.

It provides evidence that collectives of German Zionist Jews were enemies of Germany. (Posen was a province of Prussia, Germany from 1848 to 1919.)

It was found by BRoI.
theblackrabbitofinlé wrote:
Tue May 06, 2014 9:20 pm

Here's something I discovered in the British national archives:

It is a rather interesting May 20th 1917 telegram from the Foreign Office in London to the High Commissioner of Egypt (found in file FO 141/805/1, UK National Archives).

It reveals what Zionists believed was possible — not just for Zionism, but also communism — if Germany lost the war and her economy totally collapsed.
No. 507.
Following from Berne May 18th 1917, No. 381.

The following is the substance of a confidential note communicated by the Central Polish Agency.

“One of the leaders of the Zionist Movement at POSEN has admitted Zionist hopes that the war may end in the collapse of Prussia and in the victory of the Entente for they expect to obtain Palestine with the help of England. The Zionists consider that revolution and anti-dynastic movements in Prussia will only take place later on after the complete economic exhaustion of that country...”

The above confirms other evidence of German-Jewish racist antipathy, feelings of superiority and unpatriotic disloyalty to Germany and fellow Germans.

Such as this provided by the letters of Albert Einstein comparing himself and other 'Jews' with Europeans, writing in 1919:
Einstein wrote:“It does seem to me that our kinsfolk [Jews] really are more sympathetic — at least less brutal — than these horrid Europeans. Perhaps things can only improve if only the Chinese are left, who refer to all Europeans with the collective noun 'bandits.”

— Letter from A. Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest of 22nd March 1919.
English translation by A. Hentschel,
The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 9, Document 10, Princeton University Press, (2004), pp. 9-10.
Evidence that Einstein and his 'Jewish' friends in 1919 saw Europeans as separate and racially inferior to 'Jews'.

Here is an excerpt of a letter from a friend of Einstein's about his views written in 1915:
“What I hear from [Einstein] is not exactly encouraging, for it shows the impossibility of arriving at a lasting peace with Germany without first totally crushing it. Einstein says the situation looks to him far less favourable than a few months back. The victories over Russia have re-awakened German arrogance and appetite.
The word 'greedy' seems to Einstein best to characterise Germany. Einstein does not expect any renewal of Germany out of itself; it lacks the energy for it, and the boldness for initiative. He hopes for a victory of the Allies, which would smash the power of Prussia and the dynasty... Einstein and Zangger dream of a divided Germany — on the one side Southern Germany and Austria, on the other side Prussia. We speak of the deliberate blindness and the lack of psychology in the Germans.”

References:
R. Romain, La Conscience de l'Europe, Volume 1, pp. 696ff. English translation from A. Foelsing,
Albert Einstein: A Biography, Viking, New York, (1997), pp. 365-367.
Get that?! During a war situation, Einstein and his 'Jewish' friends in 1915, saw their country as alien to them and wrote to each other expressing how they wanted to see its defeat in war and wishing it to be "totally crushed", divided and its power "smashed".
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
A Jewish state of Israel defence minister said this a few days ago:
“If [Hezbollah] tries perpetrating another attack, we will see an unusual response from the IDF against [the organization] and the country of Lebanon.”

https://hamodia.com/2020/07/31/gantz-in ... OkFEdGEaIg

Film shows a fire at a fireworks storage BEFORE detonation of a storage of 'confiscated'(?) ammonium nitrate:

https://youtu.be/VB-xyvEh3lM
...under normal storage conditions and without very high heat, it is difficult to ignite ammonium nitrate, according to Prof. Oxley, a chemistry professor at the University of Rhode Island.
"If you look at the video, you saw the black smoke, you saw the red smoke, that was an incomplete reaction," she said.

"I am assuming that there was a small explosion that instigated the reaction of the ammonium nitrate - whether that small explosion was an accident or something on purpose I haven't heard yet."

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
Excerpt from Richard Silverstein's article claiming Israel was behind the explosion in Beiruit:
Israel doesn’t seem to have any sense of shame or restraint when it comes to inflicting pain on its neighbors. And it has done so endlessly in Lebanon: from the bombings in the lead-up to the 1982 invasion, the 20-year occupation of Southern Lebanon, and two wars in this century. All of this inflicted massive, ongoing damage on the country. These interventions exacerbated existing ethnic and religious divisions in the country (indeed that is Israel’s modus operandi regarding its Arab neighbors), and amplified the suffering further.

Of course, there will be doubters. Those who disbelieve my source. But to them, I point out two pieces of circumstantial evidence which are telling. Normally, if Israel has undertaken a successful terror attack (such as those against Iran) it will either refuse to comment or a senior military or political figure will say something like: While we refuse to comment, whoever did it did the world a favor.

In this case, Israel immediately denied responsibility...

The second tell-tale sign is that Israel never offers humanitarian aid to its Arab neighbors. During the Syrian Civil War, the only group to whom Israel offered humanitarian assistance was its Islamist anti-Assad allies. Israel has never offered such aid to Lebanon, until today. Lebanon is officially considered an enemy state in Israel. So to have the Lebanese flag flying over Tel Aviv city hall is also extraordinary. But the cynic in me says that it is an outrage for Israelis to all of a sudden develop pity on Lebanese after their leaders caused this debacle. Israel has rained down death and destruction on the country for decades. For it to feign empathy now is the height of chutzpah.

With tongue planted firmly in cheek, Haaretz’s Gideon Levy expressed [feigned, sarcastic] shock and indignation at the prospect that Israel might have had anything to do with the tragedy. Also, in this column he links to this blog and notes pointedly that I ascribed the Beirut blast to Israel:
The “Jewish state” has never caused such disasters, and the fall of its enemies its heart has never rejoiced. So too the IDF, the army of the Jews has never caused such devastation [as the Beirut blast], certainly never in Lebanon, even less so in Beirut! Why would the IDF destroy such infrastructure? And why bomb the Beirut port? Why would the most moral army in the world bomb such a population center? That’s why the leaders of the nation rushed to offer aid to the stricken Land of the Cedars in a Jewish-Israeli tribute that is so typically humane, lofty and full of heartfelt tears.

[But] was it not defense minister [Benny Gantz] who only last week threatened that same Lebanon with destruction of infrastructure? Didn’t the prime minister also threaten Lebanon? And how does destruction of infrastructure look in Lebanon? Just like what was seen in Lebanon on Tuesday. The sound of thunder shook the city, black smoke billowed over it, destruction and devastation, civilian blood spilled, 4,000 injured at hospital doors…

Half of Israel and the entire IDF General Staff know how to recite the acclaimed Dahiya Doctrine. Every second politician has threatened to carry it out…And what is this sophisticated doctrine? It’s the use of disproportionate, unbridled force against infrastructure, the sowing of destruction and shedding of as much blood as possible. “Flattening” – to teach the enemy a lesson “once and for all.” The IDF has tried this more than once in the past, in Lebanon and in Gaza, and it was a dizzying success. It looks just like what was seen in Beirut on Tuesday.

…Would you accept humanitarian aid from such a country? Is there a more sickening show of hypocrisy?
Full article here: https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2020 ... ed-beirut/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 8459
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

‘International Jewry’? explosives

Post by Huntinger »

it is difficult to ignite ammonium nitrate
All nitrates including NH4NO3 are oxidizers; this compound provides a significant amount of oxygen if necessary to create an explosion using conflagration like blackpowder (uses KNO3 as oxidizer).
However, unlike potassium nitrate in blackpowder, the ammonium nitrate is a high explosive in its own right. This means it detonates like dynamite when significant shock is applied to it (another explosive). Normally the compound is regarded as inert and used for agriculture as a fertilizer; when mixed with oil an explosive in the mixture (detonator) will cause it to detonate. This is what Tim McVeigh used on the FBI Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995.
Ammonium Nitrate is often used with military explosives to add oxygen to TNT upon deflagration and also as a high explosive in its own right.

It is highly unlikely pure Ammonium Nitrate will explode on its own; this is like suggesting that a block of concrete will explode. Ammonium Nitrate will detonate without fuel; accidental ammonium nitrate explosions have killed thousands of people since the early 20th century.

There are two major classes of incidents resulting in explosions:
  1. In the first case, the explosion happens by the mechanism of shock to detonation transition. The initiation happens by an explosive charge going off in the mass, by the detonation of a shell thrown into the mass, or by detonation of an explosive mixture in contact with the mass. The examples are Kriewald, Morgan, Oppau, Tessenderlo, and Traskwood.
  2. In the second case, the explosion results from a fire that spreads into the ammonium nitrate (AN) itself (Texas City, Brest, Tianjin, Beirut), or to a mixture of an ammonium nitrate with a combustible material during the fire. The fire must be confined at least to a degree for successful transition from a fire to an explosion (a phenomenon known as "deflagration to detonation transition", or DDT). Pure, compact AN is stable and very difficult to initiate. However, there are numerous cases when even impure AN did not explode in a fire.
Ammonium nitrate is stable at ambient temperature and pressure under many conditions, it may detonate from a strong initiation charge.

The most plausible explanation is that someone initiated the explosion with a bomb (detonator) most likely plastique. Mere burning could set this off to detonate as opposed to conflagrate but the odds of this happening are slim.

The velocity of ammonium nitrate detonation is about 2.7 kms-1; TNT has a detonation velocity of 6.9kms-1, while nitroglycerin has 7.7kms-1.

Due to the low explosive brisance of ammonium nitrate, it is estimated that the explosion is equivalent to a one kiloton blast of TNT (it has about a third of the energy)..however, it was still quite a blast.

Most likely someone went in with a stick of dynamite and a timer. Agent provocateurs are now inciting dissention within the populace. JooTrix


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

A Scottish shabbat goy is being "investigated" for possibly committing a crime.
Religious studies teacher faces losing job after allegedly posting anti-semitic slurs online

A senior figure in a pro-Israel group faces losing his job as a religious studies teacher — after allegedly posting anti-Semitic slurs online. Edward Sutherland set up a fake social media page which he used to write inflammatory messages.

Now the Belmont Academy employee – head of religious and moral education at the Ayr school – is being investigated over his fitness to be in the classroom by the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS).

Image
Edward Sutherland

However, his supporters have told the standards watchdog the site was a decoy created to lure bigots into making illegal comments.

Sources also say the page was used to monitor the activities of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (SPSC).
Sutherland was convener of the Confederation of Friends of Israel (COFIS), a lobby group and registered charity. He has stepped down while the investigation is underway.

He called himself Steven Harrison on the Facebook page which was created in 2018. ...COFIS says on its website: “We want to challenge the lies that are spread by hateful individuals and hate groups who claim to care about ‘the Palestinians’ but really just want to attack Israel.”

Sutherland could not be contacted for comment.

Image
Edward Sutherland at a Friends of Israel stand

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scot ... YnvquP1GqU
What a despicable, immoral, conspiratorial, devious, dishonest mindset: making admittedly "illegal comments" to supposedly "lure bigots" into “making illegal comments”.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9769
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

For 300 years or so, Zionism was a Christian Protestant idea that the majority of Jewish leaders at the time — especially rabbis — had been opposed to, and understood to be a call for the expulsion of Jews.

So it took about 300 years before Jewish intellectuals would take it up in the 19th century. ... [and] they remained a minority among Jews.

Zionism as a Christian idea for Christians begins much earlier. After all, the very basis of the Crusades of the 9th to the 11th century, was precisely an understanding that the Christian religion (to which the majority of European populations had converted), was based on a [territory] that these European Christians did not control. So the idea of the Crusades was to capture the land of Jesus Christ from which the religion to which they had converted had issued.
This is very interesting in light of the fact that no European has ever thought that European Christians — by virtue of having converted to this Palestinian religion — are descendants of the original Palestinian Christians. Yet as we know many of them believe that European converts to Judaism must in fact be descendants of the ancient Hebrews.

So on the one hand we have a Christian Zionist idea of European Christians that was popular during the Crusades, about... having to ‘return’ — or at least capture — the homeland of the ancient Hebrews. And then by the late 19th century we begin to have some interest by some Jewish intellectuals in the question of seeing themselves... through these Protestant anti-Jewish eyes, ...seeing themselves as not necessarily belonging to Europe, [and] as somehow being direct descendants of the ancient Hebrews.

https://moderaterebels.com/episode-9-tr ... ph-massad/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 26 guests