‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Watch this: where an ex-Jew ex-Israeli explains a misinformation technique:

"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous


Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!


Norm
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2019 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by Norm »

Another classic example (referring to a segment in the discussion above) is:

Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership
WITH GUN OWNERS increasingly aware of the Jewish leadership of the gun-banning movement, a group of Jews in Milwaukee claiming to be defenders of the Second Amendment have been noisily denouncing gun control as a “Nazi” scheme. The group, calling themselves Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, assert that Adolf Hitler was the father of all gun grabbers. The proof of this, they claim, was the German Weapons Law (Waffengesetz) of March 18, 1938, which was enacted by Germany’s National Socialist government. They have succeeded in persuading at least one magazine read by firearms enthusiasts to publicize their claims repeatedly (Guns and Ammo, May 1993 and March 1994).



Despite these facts, there are a number of people among those who support Second Amendment rights who have fallen for the Jewish trick of associating gun-grabbing with Hitler and the National Socialists. These people sometimes make such statements as, “The first thing Hitler did when he came to power was round up all the guns.” Such statements are demonstrably false, and when they are made by a person who genuinely supports Second Amendment rights they reveal the person’s ignorance or dishonesty. When they are made by a Jewish group it is clear that their intent is to confuse the public and deceitfully deflect blame from their fellow Jews.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/01/is ... zi-scheme/
In some circumstances it can be rationally assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be easily discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of evidence of its occurrence as proof of its non-occurrence.
Such is the case for the fraudulently alleged holocaust mass graves: No graves = No holocaust - simple as that.

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Mintpress are doing some great articles linking various things together that most Jewish owned/controlled news media are silent about.

Here is a recent one on Jewish American and Israeli involvement in the murder of Iran's head of security plus others in the convoy.
Israel’s fingerprints are all over the assassination of Qasem Soleimani

It is no secret that Israel is itching for a war against Iran. Yet all of Tel Aviv’s efforts have failed to bring about US-led war similar to the Iraq invasion in 2003. The most that Netanyahu could achieve in terms of US support in that regard was a decision by the Trump administration to renege on the US commitment to the international community by withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Treaty in May 2018.

That coveted Israeli war seemed assured when Iran, after various provocations and the slapping by Washington of yet more sanctions, shot down a US unmanned aerial vehicle that, as Iran maintained, violated the country’s airspace, on June 20, 2019.

Even then, the US response fell short of achieving the all-out war that Netanyahu has been so frantically seeking.

But much has happened since then, including a repeat of Netanyahu’s failure to win a decisive election, thus securing another term in office, compounding the Israeli Prime Minister’s fully justified fear that he could eventually find himself behind bars for operating a massive racket of bribes and misuse of power.

Trump, too, has his own political woes, thus his own reasons to act erratically and irresponsibly. His official impeachment by the US House of Representatives on December 18 was the last of such bad news. He too needed to up the political ante.

If there is one thing that many Democratic and Republican lawmakers have in common is their desire for more Middle East military interventions and to maintain a stronger military presence in the oil and gas-rich region. This was reflected in the near-celebratory tone that US officials, generals, and media commentators have used following the assassination of the Iranian commander in Baghdad.

Israeli officials too were visibly excited. Immediately following the killing of General Soleimani, Israeli leaders and officials issued statements and tweets in support of the US action.

For his part, Netanyahu declared that “Israel has the right to defend itself. The US has the same right exactly.” “Soleimani,” he added, “is responsible for the deaths of innocent US citizens and many others. He was planning further attacks.”

The last statement in particular, “he was planning further attacks,” points to the obvious joint intelligence and information sharing between Washington and Tel Aviv.

Benny Gantz, mistakenly celebrated for being a “centrist”, was no less militant in his views. When it comes to matters of national security, “there is no coalition and opposition,” he stated.

“The killing of Soleimani is a message to all the head of global terror: on your own heads be it,” the Israeli general, responsible for the death of thousands of innocent Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere, also added.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/israel-mo ... ni/263923/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Turnagain
Posts: 8271
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by Turnagain »

Gaddafi was planning on introducing a gold dinar so he obviously had a substantial amount of gold stored away. What happened to that gold stash, been-there?

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Here is an article in the Jerusalem Post admitting this:

ISRAELI INTEL HELPED THE US ASSASSINATE SOLEIMANI

https://m.jpost.com/Middle-East/Israeli ... afAiWW4kaw

been-there wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:31 pm
Mintpress are doing some great articles linking various things together that most Jewish owned/controlled news media are silent about.

Here is a recent one on Jewish American and Israeli involvement in the murder of Iran's head of security plus others in the convoy.
Israel’s fingerprints are all over the assassination of Qasem Soleimani

It is no secret that Israel is itching for a war against Iran. Yet all of Tel Aviv’s efforts have failed to bring about US-led war similar to the Iraq invasion in 2003. The most that Netanyahu could achieve in terms of US support in that regard was a decision by the Trump administration to renege on the US commitment to the international community by withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Treaty in May 2018.

That coveted Israeli war seemed assured when Iran, after various provocations and the slapping by Washington of yet more sanctions, shot down a US unmanned aerial vehicle that, as Iran maintained, violated the country’s airspace, on June 20, 2019.

Even then, the US response fell short of achieving the all-out war that Netanyahu has been so frantically seeking.

But much has happened since then, including a repeat of Netanyahu’s failure to win a decisive election, thus securing another term in office, compounding the Israeli Prime Minister’s fully justified fear that he could eventually find himself behind bars for operating a massive racket of bribes and misuse of power.

Trump, too, has his own political woes, thus his own reasons to act erratically and irresponsibly. His official impeachment by the US House of Representatives on December 18 was the last of such bad news. He too needed to up the political ante.

If there is one thing that many Democratic and Republican lawmakers have in common is their desire for more Middle East military interventions and to maintain a stronger military presence in the oil and gas-rich region. This was reflected in the near-celebratory tone that US officials, generals, and media commentators have used following the assassination of the Iranian commander in Baghdad.

Israeli officials too were visibly excited. Immediately following the killing of General Soleimani, Israeli leaders and officials issued statements and tweets in support of the US action.

For his part, Netanyahu declared that “Israel has the right to defend itself. The US has the same right exactly.” “Soleimani,” he added, “is responsible for the deaths of innocent US citizens and many others. He was planning further attacks.”

The last statement in particular, “he was planning further attacks,” points to the obvious joint intelligence and information sharing between Washington and Tel Aviv.

Benny Gantz, mistakenly celebrated for being a “centrist”, was no less militant in his views. When it comes to matters of national security, “there is no coalition and opposition,” he stated.

“The killing of Soleimani is a message to all the head of global terror: on your own heads be it,” the Israeli general, responsible for the death of thousands of innocent Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere, also added.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/israel-mo ... ni/263923/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:58 pm
Gaddafi was planning on introducing a gold dinar so he obviously had a substantial amount of gold stored away. What happened to that gold stash, been-there?
Yes, where is Libya's gold?

Nobody who knows has ever said where the missing gold is.

All we know for sure is that Gaddafi, the man whose leadership brought so much wealth to Libya, was brutally murdered by a mob of Western-paid, Western-armed jihadi rabble. Who didn’t merely kill him, but also tortured and sodomized him with a blade first. Not forgetting to videotape their actions, for the viewing pleasure of their paymasters, who appear to like some snuff porn.

Hillary Clinton watched the film and seems to have been delighted by it.
Laughing at her own sadistic gratification and wit she exclaimed: “We came, we saw, he died!”


Part of Hillary Clinton's intercepted emails showed she's received THIS information in 2011 explaining why France's 'sayanim' President Nicolas Sarkozy had led the bombing and western inteference of Libya's sovereignty:
3. Qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources to continue indefinitely, according to the latest report we have received:
On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Salt al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while the freezing of Libya’s foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact. According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafi’s government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli.
This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French.franc (CFA).
(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:

a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
b. Increase French influence in North Africa,
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05779612 Date: 12/31/2015
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05779612 Date: 12/31/2015
c. Improve his intemai political situation in France,
d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa)
Info from here
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Your complete Jewish guide to watching the Oscars

The 92nd Academy Awards ceremony is already a Jewish affair. ...film’s biggest night still has plenty of Yiddishkeit to offer. Jewish directors, writers and actors abound in the major categories and a film in which Hitler is rendered as a goose-stepping clown is up for Best Picture. At least one Israeli model will be in attendance. Don Rickles’s ghost will, as is his wont, be hovering in the wings of the Dolby Theatre making withering remarks about Scarlett Johansson’s current beau, Colin Jost. While we long for the days of Billy Crystal’s tenure, we welcome the abbreviated format of an Oscars without a host and embrace the Jewishness that still lingers over the proceedings.

JEWISH NOMINEES
While Jewish director Taika Waititi’s “Jojo Rabbit,” which tells the story of a Jewish girl hiding in the home of a member of the Hitler Youth, is the only explicitly Jewish film up for Best Picture, five of the eight nominated films were directed by Jews.

Todd Phillips directed “Joker.” Sam Mendes helmed “1917” and is among the chosen alongside “Ford V. Ferrari” director James Mangold (the script for “Ford” was penned in part by Jez Butterworth, whose play “The Ferryman”earned Mendes a 2019 Tony for Best Director). Noah Baumbach of “Marriage Story” is Jewish, though his partner, Greta Gerwig, whose “Little Women” is also up for Best Picture, is not.

Waititi and Phillips (with Scott Silver) are up for Adapted Screenplay, with Waititi working from Christine Leunens’s novel “Caging Skies” for his screenplay and Phillips and Silver riffing on a classic Batman villain for their script. Mendes and Baumbach are nominated for Original Screenplay, though both men mined their personal histories for the films, one examining the fray of his grandfather’s time in the Great War, the other meditating on the frontlines of his divorce.

Joaquin Phoenix is nominated for his manic, emaciated turn as Arthur Fleck in “Joker,” a character originally dreamed up (if not under that given name and origin story) by the Jewish comics team of Bill Finger, Bob Kane and Jerry Robinson.

It’s Phoenix’s fourth nomination, and he already won the Golden Globe and the BAFTA for it, but Scarlett Johansson received her first Oscar nominations in both the Best Actress and Supporting Actress categories for “Marriage Story” and “Jojo Rabbit” respectively. Cate Blanchett was the last actor to have that distinction for playing the OG WASP Elizabeth I and the very Jewish (though avowedly Christian) Bob Dylan.

Despite a great showing in the Best Picture category, only Mendes and Phillips are up for Best Director.

Rounding out this esteemed company are two cousins, Randy Newman and Thomas Newman, part of the second generation of the legendary Newman film music family. Randy is nominated twice, for Original Score for “Marriage Story” and Best Original Song for “Toy Story 4,” while Thomas has his fifteenth nomination for the score of “1917.” If Thomas wins, it will be his first Oscar; Randy has taken home the gold twice before.

PERFORMANCES
Randy Newman is also scheduled to perform his nominated song, “I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away.” It won’t be his first time at the piano at the awards, and it almost certainly won’t be his strangest. That title has to go to a 2001 rendition of his song, “A Fool in Love” from “Meet The Parents,” where he and The Bangles’s Susanna Hoffs crooned a duet backed by a disco ball and a pyramid of white fur-hooded choristers. That really happened. Watch it...

Etc., etc., etc...
. . . . . . . . . — . . . . . . .

Read more here
More brazenly celebratory stories bragging about Jews and their control of the mind-manipulating film industry here.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Israel is one of the biggest human trafficking hubs in the world, according the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

https://preview.presstv.com/ptv/program ... -25min.mp4

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
Like the translator of Schramm's research [posted in full below], I also had assumed that belief in Jew's ritually murdering Christian children and consuming their blood was a medieval, anti-semitic, unbelievable, superstition which I knew by the Jewish term of the 'blood libel'.

Although Werd had detailed BEFORE, the very convincing case of a Jewish ritualised murder of a child of Christians in Kiev in 1911, somehow I had still not understood or taken in the enormity of what that particular case revealed.

Perhaps it is the very 'enormity' of it which makes it so difficult to comprehend and believe.

Now, after the Jewish press's over-dramatised, exaggerated indignation and protestation of the painting by the Italian artist Giovanni Gasparro of the murder of Simon of Trento in 1677, suddenly the blinkers have been lifted from my eyes!!
After Werd's documenting of the ritualised murder by Jews of Andreas Youshinsky I did some research to check the accuracy of it and the other cases Werd quoted.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4131&p=167317#p167317

Wow! :o

It now appears to me to be undoubtedly true!!! :o :(
Jewish ritual murder:
a historical investigation


SCHRAMM (1941)

Translator's Preface — R. Reiser


I was first approached nearly a year ago by researcher Mark Farrell, with a request for help in translating Hellmut Schramm's book, Der judische Ritualmord : Eine historische Untersuchung [Jewish Ritual-Murder : a Historical Investigation]. I agreed to translate one chapter into English, with the possibility of my making a deeper commitment should I deem the book worth
such an investment of my time and energy. To my great surprise, I not only found Schramm's work to be worth translating, but I became determined to perform the entire translation myself and see it made available in English.

Perhaps this is the place for me to state my own educational/political background and my approach to this topic. I have a bachelor's degree in Mathematics, but I also took a heavy course concentration in European History, particularly of the period prior to 1600, and I have fluency in reading German.
In high school — this was before the long slow slide of the educational system into its present lobotomized condition — I took four years of Latin and have periodically refreshed my Latin skills. Aside from formal course work, I've maintained a life-long interest in History and consider myself well-read (for a lay person) in the subject. I do not hold any advanced degrees; nor can I point to a long list of credentials which might imbue my writing with the aura or status which attends the opinions of 'experts.' Therefore, as you read my comments — and as you read Schramm — it is your own intelligence, common sense, and life experience which must be the final arbiter of the validity or invalidity of the phenomenon of Jewish ritual-murder (JRM).

I believe that it is becoming increasingly clear — and even to those disinclined to think or analyze events around them — that Jewish/Zionist control of what I term the 'Propasphere' * is very real; in Germany, Austria, France, and other European countries, to voice mere doubts about the so-called 'Holocaust' — the number of Jewish dead and/or the cause of their deaths — is punishable as a felony-level crime, and there have been literally thousands who have been imprisoned for writing forensic analyses and/or carefully reasoned and well-documented articles which contest the 'party line' on such issues.
'Israel' — occupied Palestine — directs the foreign policy of the United States and other countries, and billions in foreign aid, military help, grants (outright gifts), loans, 'reparations' for supposed crimes, have flowed in one direction —
toward Israel — ever since the end of the Second World War. The actual circumstances involved in the creation of the Soviet state, of the Third Reich, and the truth as opposed to the propaganda about the 'Jewish Question,' are finally emerging after years of distortion. Many who are reading this are already well aware of the scholarly work of Kevin MacDonald — as well as the honest writing of such Jews as Shahak and Freedman. The essence of what they have to say was succinctly captured by Nietzsche, when he wrote:
The two sets of valuations, good/bad and good/evil, have waged a terrible battle on this earth, lasting many millennia; and just as surely as the second set has for a long time now been in the ascendant, so surely are there still places where the battle goes on and the issue remains in suspension... The watchwords of the battle, written in characters which have remained legible throughout human history, read: "Rome vs. Israel, Israel vs. Rome."
No battle has ever been more momentous than this one.

That deep and abiding antipathy felt by Jews (whether religious or not) toward non-Jews and in particular toward Aryans, runs like a poisonous theme throughout the Talmud, and has been explicitly expressed by many prominent Jews — rabbis, politicians, financiers, writers, etc. — in unmistakably clear words. Jewish boasting about the degree of control which Jews now have in all facets of the media, banking, and government has been well documented and the sources for all of this are widely available through the Internet and in any large library; it is not my purpose to rehearse them here, but only to make it quite clear that that control and that marrow-deep animosity are factors which I took as a given from the very beginning of the project of translation.

But it is important that I also make it clear that, in regard to the subject of JRM, I was totally skeptical at the beginning; had I been asked to make a wager, I certainly would have bet that JRM was not a real phenomenon. I suspected that, like a lot of mythical material, it expressed a metaphysical truth: that it was a metaphor for the essence of the relationship between the various Jewish communities in the Diaspora and their host populations in Europe and elsewhere over the centuries. At most, I thought that perhaps a sporadic case or two of Jewish murderers killing children, or the like, had taken on lurid overtones in the retelling. After all — whenever this topic is encountered in print or is spoken of anywhere in the Propasphere, is it not always referred to as the "blood-libel" ? And isn't an entire package of images contained in this term ?
What comes to mind is a scene from Frankenstein, with a mob of peasants, carrying torches and howling, about to set upon some hapless victim of its ignorance and superstition. The substitution of such images in lieu of a genuine neutrality toward the question is a rather fine example of how insidious the media, particularly television, have been in transposing such issues to a pre-set frame of reference which guarantees how discourse will occur and how it will terminate. The official 'party line' on JRM is that all such incidents were crimes which ignorant and superstitious peasants blamed on innocent Jews during the Middle Ages. The truth, however, is different: these accusations predate both the Middle Ages and the start of the Christian era. Reports from a range of sources, varying widely in chronology and geographical setting, show remarkable consistency, and learned, conscientious investigators were often involved in ascertaining what actually occurred. In many cases — such as the Damascus double murders — men of known rectitude, intelligence and of wide experience in the world, such as Sir Richard Burton, confirmed its existence.

The position I have come to after translating this work, is that the accusation of JRM has always been based upon a real and not an imaginary, phenomenon, a historical reality. I believe that, for all practical purposes, and for a variety of reasons, genuine cases of JRM were beginning to peter out at around the turn of the 20th century. I believe that they were perpetrated by what are usually referred to as the "ultra-Orthodox" Jews; after the mid 17th century, that means the Hasidim in particular; that up until the late 19th century, the existence of JRM was more generally known to exist by the Jews themselves, although its practice was anything but universal among them. I believe that today, very few Jews know its history and most of them do indeed honestly regard it as a "libel." What has convinced me of it as historical reality are the following:

1. Descriptions of the various incidents go back in the historical record to around 170 B.C., and then occur over the next approximately 2000 years wherever a Jewish community of any size has lived;

2. The details of the cases — what today would be called the "signature" and the modus operandi of these crimes are remarkably consistent, especially considering the lack of communication over widely separated geographical locations during much of that millennium-and-a-half.

3. Contrary to the way it is always portrayed, JRM is not just an hysterical collection of horror stories originating in ignorant peasant minds, but has been considered genuine by educated persons who actually had opportunity to investigate the crimes committed, and who left detailed documentation in the form of trial protocols, etc.

4. There have been rare but genuine defections by Jews who left Judaism voluntarily and not in an attempt to gain leniency or favours, and who wrote about this practice.

5. Even assuming confessions were gained by torture, in several cases the judicial authorities saw to it that witnesses and accused were questioned separately, with no opportunity to compare notes. In some of these cases, physical evidence was found which corroborated the statements of the accused in such a way as to establish their guilt beyond question. In other
cases, Jews were actually caught in the act.

6. As with other phenomena associated with the Jews, this one has been associated with no other "minority group" world-wide — rather odd if it were just the result of some sort of myth-creating tendency, or something analogous to it.

7. The details of purported cases of JRM, separated by more than 500 years, show the same patterns, the same confessional features, and so forth.

8. There are highly suggestive passages even in Jewish sacred writings which indicate that this practice was not only condoned but prescribed.
References to the use of sacrificial human blood appear in various religious Jewish works, and in the writings of well-known Jewish luminaries, as Schramm delineates; according to the tractates of the Jewish philosopher Maimonides, blood obtained by the piercing of the body is a curative beverage — the blood of animals is not what is meant. In a very rare and little-known book by Rabbi Chaim Wital, Ets-Chaim (XVII Century), we read that "the murder of goys and the drinking of their blood increases the holiness of Israel for the Jews."

What must be appreciated is the nature of Judaism itself. As many have begun to perceive, Judaism has a sort of Siamese twin relationship with 'anti-Semitism,' and it is the kind of Siamese twinship in which the two entities are conjoined at vital organs — which renders their separation an impossibility, which, if it were performed, would doom them both. As a culture, the Jewish people have not produced any science, technology, art, or writing (aside from the Talmud, the Jewish scriptures, and other religious works). They have performed well — sometimes brilliantly — in the arts and sciences of Aryan culture, but the Jewish race itself — and it is a race or sub-race/taxon — has never created a specifically Jewish art or science of any kind. This, indeed, makes it unique. Its own sense of identity is so bound up with a sense of being chosen, of being not only superior to all other peoples, but a different order of being entirely. Not only this, but the central meaning of human (i.e. Jewish only) life and even of the Universe itself is inseparably related to the existence of the Jews and of their enemies, the goyim. In 1994, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the 'Lubavitcher Rebbe,' and leader of the Chabad sect of Hasidim, died. This man — who had received countless honors, testimonials, etc. from heads of state and who had followers throughout the world, who had enormous influence in 'Israel,' and who was regarded as the Messiah by his disciples and as a paragon of humanitarianism by many in the Gentile world — had this to say about why non-Jews are allowed to exist:
...the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world.... A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews...
[Excerpt from Allan C. Brownfeld's review of Israel
Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, Pluto Press, London, 1999.].
As readers will discover, this Schneerson was a member of a famous dynasty of Jews, each of which succeeded in turn to the position of Zaddik — holy man — of the Chabad Hasidim. The Propasphere face of the Hasidim — that presented to the public — is that of a group of 'fools for God,' who sing and pray their way through the day and eschew worldly pleasures. The reality is very different. Several prominent Hasidim have been convicted of large swindles (of course, by Talmudic logic, Jews are only required to deal uprightly with other Jews); the ultra-Orthodox/Orthodox Jews enjoy what amounts to control of the world diamond market — hardly an 'unworldly' endeavour. In addition, no fewer than three of Schneerson's direct forebears were implicated in various ritual-murders, including the Beilis case (1911).

Another feature of the religion is that there are degrees of access to knowledge; for a long time before the Talmud was written down, its core existed as oral law; in Judaism, the oral law is at least co-equal to the written law, and is sometimes viewed as superior to it. Beyond the Talmud itself, there is the Cabbala, which is really a system of magic, with esoteric rituals, many of which exist only as oral tradition and which have never been committed to writing.

Schramm completed his book in 1941. The future must have seemed hopeful due to the early military victories of Germany, and before Britain proved to be intransigent and America became involved in the war. Schramm writes as one utterly convinced of the truth of what he is saying, and he makes no pretense at 'objectivity' — for him, the case for JRM has been proved beyond doubt.

After having read the entire work, I find that I disagree in some minor points with Schramm's views:

1. I believe that some (although fewer than one might think.) cases of alleged JRM were garden-variety 'regular' murders — although not any of the cases which Schramm chose to explore at chapter length.

2. I do not believe that the practice of JRM was quite as common as Schramm believes it to have been. But we must also keep in mind that the situation in Europe and Asia Minor vis-a-vis the Jews was radically different during the first decades of the 20th century. Jewish communities were unimaginably more insular and more traditional than is the case today for any but the most ultra-Orthodox Jews.

3. I believe that the practice of JRM was waning even during the last decade or so of the 19th century, that it continued to do so after the turn of the century, and that, if it still exists today, it exists as a very rare phenomenon.

I believe that, as concerns JRM, there has been a process of forgetting, deliberate only in the sense that it is purposeful and not in the sense of having been consciously invoked, by Jewry. This mechanism, I think, is not so very different from the process of creation of the gas chamber/ 6-million-died myth of the 'Holocaust' — it's a rearrangement and distortion of what actually happened in the (perceived) interests of Jewry.

https://archive.org/stream/Hellmut.Schr ... r_djvu.txt
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 9353
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
More on the Jewish ritual murder and the quite amazingly co-ordinated and largely successful attempts by Jews the world over during the last two hundred years to discredit it as an 'anti-semitic blood libel'.
[For the other discussion of it see here]

I remain quite shocked at what I now see as the irrefutable credibility of:
1. the accusations that certain Jewish sects ritually murdered victims by draining them of their blood while still alive,
and
2. the unanimous and concerted efforts by Jews of all stripes and varieties right up to the present time in perpetuating the cover-up of the facts and details of those ritualised murders for Judaic purposes!

The second part I actually find more shocking and reprehensibile: this aspect alone is evidence of an accusation of collective immorality that can fairly be generalised and applied to 'world jewry'.

That some wierd minority sect within Judaism was engaging in these cruel murders over the centuries can be disregarded as a pernicious but unrepresentative abnormality.
But the cover-up??! :o
The dishonest discrediting, smearing, ruining — and even murdering of witnesses and chroniclers — that continues to this very day, makes all who participate in it complicit, immoral accessories to these crimes.

Anyway, it looks like this other forbidden, protected and largely buried aspect of Jewish history is about to be resurrected.
A film is being made of the Damuscus case of ritual murder by Jews in 1840.
The Arab answer to Schindler’s List.
In 1983, the Syrian Minister of Defense Mustafa Tlass, one of the pillars of the Syrian Ba’athist regime, wrote the book Matzah of Zion, in which he describes [the Damascus Case]... Minister Tlass presented his accusation as a historical fact and even declared in an interview...with Der Spiegel[43], that his book is ‘an historical study...based on documents from France, Vienna and the American University in Beirut.’ The U.S. Secretary of State, George Schultz, instructed the American ambassador in Damascus to meet with Minister Tlass and to protest the publication of the book, but Tlass refused to meet,,, claiming that he had ‘nothing to say to him.

Matzah of Zion: the movie.
...the Egyptian weekly, Roz-Al-Yussuf reports that Egyptian producer, Munir Radhi, is making a film adaptation of the book... According to Roz Al- Yussuf[44] Minister Tlass asked Radhi: ‘Aren’t you afraid of what might happen to you... because the book openly accuses the Zionist movement of being behind the assassinations of people who exposed the Zionist conspiracy right from the start?’
Radhi responded that he was not afraid, and the project got on its way.
...Roz Al-Yussuf reported that Egyptian actor Omar Al-Sharif, best known for his role in Dr. Zhivago is a candidate for the lead role, and that two other Egyptian actors will appear in the film.

The goal: an answer to Schindler’s List.
It has not yet been decided whether the film will have the same title as the book on which it is based, The Matzah of Zion, or whether it will be changed to Harari’s List, after the name of the head of the Jewish community in Damascus who was accused of murdering Father Tomasa to use his blood for baking Matzahs.
...The plot is based on the true story of the murder of the priest, who is portrayed in the film as an amiable character, who loved life and took part in the holidays and the celebrations of the people of Damascus and solved their everyday problems.
...The script will expose much more horrible things than this loathsome crime: the connection between Western colonialism and the Zionist movement, and the way in which the Jews were used in colonialist conspiracies... will be exposed through documents found by the movie’s heroes when they are investigating the murder of Father Tomasa.”
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Nessie and 14 guests