International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
torus9
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2018 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by torus9 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:00 pm

Huntinger wrote:
Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:32 pm
That is off this topic, but it was never claimed there was nothing there. There are unknown variables yet to be discovered, especially in quantum physics. The concept of nothing is something people cannot understand as it has no meaning. There was also no time and your phrase implies a temporal state. While this is a philosophical question, those answers are being discussed and thought out in places like CERN.
"Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist ... It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe alight."

To Richard Dawkins, "nothing" is "something quite simple". And the Buddha roars a belly laugh! Dawkins also hates holocaust "deniers".

We can essentially invoke "Rumsfeld's Paradox".

Known knowns.
Unknown knowns.
Known unknowns.
Unknown unknowns.

Lets' s drop it and get back to the topic at hand.
Last edited by torus9 on Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 4171
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by Huntinger » Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:44 pm

torus9 wrote:
Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:00 pm

"Spontaneous creation
They do not know if it is spontaneous and I doubt if the word creation is appropriate as that implies a creator by definition a priori. However, the thread is about International Jewry; unless they are involved in Quantum physics at CERN or something perhaps we should forget about this topic here. ;)
𝕲𝕰𝕾𝕿𝕬𝕻𝕺

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Sun Aug 26, 2018 4:15 am

Yeah, so anyway,... back to the subject of this topic thread... ;)

Here are some observations on how 'international Jewry' has been manifesting during the last three years; specifically its inteference in British politics.

There is currently a campaign being waged against a political leader in Britain by what Israeli Jewish journalist Gideon Levy called the ‘Jewish establishment’.
It is motivated by a predicted governmental collapse and thus imminent national election for a new government and new Prime minister. The increasing favourite to win is the current Labour leader who uniquely for a popular politican has a rare and consistently principled track record of being unashamedly pro-Palestinian.
Jewish Zionists, Christian zionists, opportunist 'Friends of Israel', Jews generally and Jewish organisations in Britain and Israel — including the Israeli embassy, Mossad agents and recently even the PM of Israel — have all cooperated in a three year long campaign of vilification, misinformation and 'anti-semite' smear tactics against this politician.

I think — no I actually know — that the increasingly blatantly dishonest and shady tactics together with blanket amplification of them by ALL the organs of mass-media have opened people's eyes to the predominantly 'Jewish' hand behind this campaign and their amazingly high level of influence and power.

Political organisations and the people in them who didn't believe me two years ago and suspected me of being an 'anti-semite' for raising the issue, now are beginning to acknowledge the problem.

As usual it is 'righteous Jews' who are able to be more direct and critical in their exposure of this ancient problem called 'international Jewry' and how that manifests: in this case, how it has manifested as an undemocratic, defamation dirty-tricks campaign PLUS two undemocratic, treasonable leadership 'coup' attempts and a nationwide hijacking of the main-stream media to serve the interests of a foreign racist 'Jewish state'.

Here's an article on it by secular 'American' Jew, Prof Norman Finkelstein:
THE CHIMERA OF BRITISH ANTI-SEMITISM, AND HOW NOT TO FIGHT IT IF IT WERE REAL
...the [anti-semitism] brouhaha is a calculated hoax — dare it be said, plot? — to oust Jeremy Corbyn and the principled leftist politics he represents from British public life.
...thus far, Corbyn’s supporters — whether it be from fear, calculation, or political correctness — dare not speak the name of the evil that is afoot.
and here he talks about the Jewish own übermensch mentality:
...What a Jewish child inherits is, [as] eminent Jewish novelist Philip Roth once observed, “...a kind of psychology: and the psychology can be translated in three words—‘Jews are better.’”
A prominent Jewish-American scholar shamelessly gushed: “Jews would have been less than human had they eschewed any notion of superiority altogether” and “it is extraordinarily difficult for American Jews to expunge the sense of superiority altogether, however much they may try to suppress it”.[6]
and here, their manipulative abuse of their 'holocaust' narrative:
Jews exploit Holocaust victimhood for their own purposes.
Voluble Israeli foreign minister Abba Eban is supposed to have quipped “There’s no business like Shoah business”. But when this writer published a little book in 2000 entitled The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering,[9] it evoked a torrent of ad hominem attacks.
...nearly two decades have elapsed since the book’s hostile reception, and by now its argument no longer even raises eyebrows as it has passed into a cliché. Whether it be to justify another war of aggression or another massacre of civilians, whether it be to market another schlock Holocaust film or another schlock Holocaust novel, Jews have not hesitated — on the contrary — to wrap themselves in the sacred mantle of Jewish martyrdom. A book by former speaker of the Israeli parliament Avraham Burg decrying Israel’s fixation on the Holocaust casually refers to “the Shoah industry.” It “converts piercing pain into hollowness and kitsch” Burg observes, and extenuates Israeli crimes: “American Jews, like Israelis, are.... raising the Shoah banner high to the sky and exploiting it politically... All is compared to the Shoah, dwarfed by the Shoah, and therefore all is allowed — be it fences, sieges... food and water deprivation... All is permitted because we have been through the Shoah and you will not tell us how to behave.” Is Burg guilty of anti-Semitism?
and here he discusses Jewish power:
This writer’s late mother used to muse, “It’s no accident that Jews invented the word chutzpah.”
The transparent motive behind this cynical campaign is to demonise Corbyn, not because he’s a “fucking anti-Semite” but because he’s a principled champion of Palestinian rights.
However, Corbyn’s candidacy is not just about Palestine or even the British laboring classes. It’s a beacon for the homeless, the hungry, and the hopeless, the despised, the downtrodden, and the destitute everywhere. If Corbyn’s traducers succeed, the glimmer of possibility he has held out will be snuffed out by a gang of moral blackmailers and extortionists. Is it anti-Semitism to believe that “Jews have too much power in Britain”—or is it just plain common sense?
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Mon Aug 27, 2018 6:49 pm

.
Here's an article on the same Jewish-motivated, high-level, co-ordinated, anti-democracy, dirty tricks campaign against a prospective Prime Minister.
This one is by the Jazz saxophonist who renounced both his Jewish self-identification and his Israeli citizenship, Gilad Atzmon.
He gave it the title: Now, this is Racism!
Image

What do you call an exclusively Aryan club that welcomes support from ALL members of society but only allows Aryans in as members?

Nazis I guess.

What would you call a white nationalist campaign organisation that welcomes support from people of ALL colours who agree with their ‘statement of principles’ but only allows nonwhites in as ‘solidarity members’?

I think that ‘white supremacist’ is the term the Left uses to refer to such groups.

Would Jeremy Corbyn accept support from groups that name themselves ‘Aryan Voice for Labour’ or ‘Whites for Corbyn’? Would the Labour party allow any such groups in its proximity? I don’t think so, they would be booted out in seconds. The Labour leader would be very quick to disassociate himself from such racially exclusive bodies. But neither Labour nor Corbyn have ever contemplated denouncing the Jews only, racially exclusive enthusiasts at Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL).

This means that even if you are not racially qualified as a Jew, you can still ‘support’ the Jews only group. You can make a donation, you may even be able to join their miniature protests but you will never be a proper member of the clan, you can only be a class B ‘solidarity member...

“Our political priorities are universal human rights and dignity; justice for all; freedom of expression; and democracy in the Labour Party.” This sounds spectacularly good, but begs the question of how they claim to adhere to universality when they don’t even accept Goyim as equal participants in their club. Apparently the 'solidarity members' do not enjoy voting rights as the JVL's constitution specifies that the organisation is led by Jewish people. The inevitable answer is that the JVL’s statement is duplicitous at its core.

And the lies continues: “Our mission is to contribute to making the Labour Party an open, democratic and inclusive party, encouraging all ethnic groups and cultures to join and participate freely.” The Labour Party should be an ‘open space,’ but the JVL is clearly not. It is a tribal, racially exclusive setting that operates in total contradiction of every Labour Party value.

And again, “we (JVL) aim to strengthen the party in its opposition to all forms of racism including anti-Semitism.” The JVL is against all forms of racism except their own. I am pretty sure that the JVL would oppose groups called ‘Aryans for Jeremy’ or ‘White Voices for Labour’ but for some reason they fail to see that they themselves engage in identical racist activities.
Now unlike Atzmon I actually understand the motivation for why Jewish supporters of Jeremy Corbyn would want to accentuate the Jewishness of their group. Its obviously to counter the accusation and implication that Corbyn is only supported by other anti-semites in addition to himself.
A group who are avowedly Jewish, predominantly Jewish, and led by Jews obviously spells that this is a blatantly false attempt at defamation, more clearly than a group that is none of the above.

This demonstrates how divisive, destructive and damaging the political abuse of the 'anti-semite' slur is.
been-there wrote:
Sun Aug 26, 2018 4:15 am
Yeah, so anyway,... back to the subject of this topic thread... ;)

Here are some observations on how 'international Jewry' has been manifesting during the last three years; specifically its inteference in British politics.

There is currently a campaign being waged against a political leader in Britain by what Israeli Jewish journalist Gideon Levy called the ‘Jewish establishment’.
It is motivated by a predicted governmental collapse and thus imminent national election for a new government and new Prime minister. The increasing favourite to win is the current Labour leader who uniquely for a popular politican has a rare and consistently principled track record of being unashamedly pro-Palestinian.
Jewish Zionists, Christian zionists, opportunist 'Friends of Israel', Jews generally and Jewish organisations in Britain and Israel — including the Israeli embassy, Mossad agents and recently even the PM of Israel — have all cooperated in a three year long campaign of vilification, misinformation and 'anti-semite' smear tactics against this politician.

I think — no I actually know — that the increasingly blatantly dishonest and shady tactics together with blanket amplification of them by ALL the organs of mass-media have opened people's eyes to the predominantly 'Jewish' hand behind this campaign and their amazingly high level of influence and power.

Political organisations and the people in them who didn't believe me two years ago and suspected me of being an 'anti-semite' for raising the issue, now are beginning to acknowledge the problem.

As usual it is 'righteous Jews' who are able to be more direct and critical in their exposure of this ancient problem called 'international Jewry' and how that manifests: in this case, how it has manifested as an undemocratic, defamation dirty-tricks campaign PLUS two undemocratic, treasonable leadership 'coup' attempts and a nationwide hijacking of the main-stream media to serve the interests of a foreign racist 'Jewish state'.

Here's an article on it by secular 'American' Jew, Prof Norman Finkelstein:
THE CHIMERA OF BRITISH ANTI-SEMITISM, AND HOW NOT TO FIGHT IT IF IT WERE REAL
...the [anti-semitism] brouhaha is a calculated hoax — dare it be said, plot? — to oust Jeremy Corbyn and the principled leftist politics he represents from British public life.
...thus far, Corbyn’s supporters — whether it be from fear, calculation, or political correctness — dare not speak the name of the evil that is afoot.

...[etc., etc., etc.]
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Sun Sep 02, 2018 10:15 am

.
According to Judaic Talmudic law, any Jew is permitted to make an extrajudicial killing of a person deemed to be rodef. This helps in understanding a great deal about Jewish attitudes to their assassinations of anyone they regard as a suspected or potential threat, and to their mass-murders of innocent civilians in massacres in Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Gaza and Hebron, etc.

This even applies to killing other Jews also. For example, former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was branded a rodef by some for the Oslo Accord. He was assassinated in 1995. Rabin's assassin, Yigal Amir, justified murdering Rabin partly on the basis of this Talmudic din rodef ruling. Yigal Amir believed that the Oslo concessions to the Palestinian Authority would endanger Jewish lives.
On a Sunday, I remember only too well, having woken up in Beirut to the news that day of at least 56 Lebanese men, women and children — with a heavier proportion of the latter (34 children) — whose lives were expunged in an Israeli missile strike on the village of Kfar Qanna in the south of Lebanon. These Lebanese civilians were cowering and huddled in a basement.

A couple of years later I found out, to my utter horror, that immediately after the massacre in the south of Lebanon, the Yesha Rabbinical Counsel in Israel not only proclaimed but decreed, in response to the massacre by the Israeli Army, that the at least 56 Lebanese men, women and children were not innocent. It also went on to say that according to Jewish law, during a time of battle and war, there is no such thing as 'innocence' among the enemy nation.

Guardian newspaper contributor, Professor Geoffrey Alderman argued that according to Jewish religious law, every Palestinian in Gaza who voted for Hamas was a legitimate target. He argues that according to the Halaka [Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, folio 73a]
"it is entirely legitimate to kill a rodef – that is to say, one who endangers the life of another – and this is true, incidentally, even if the rodef has not yet actually taken another life".
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Sat Sep 08, 2018 11:54 am

.
Anyone interested to know who has been a top contributer to the political campaign of Sverige Demokraterna in Sweden and to other similar nationalist parties across Europe?

Check it out:
An unlikely union

...Stephens ...is wrong to claim that Israel is not an ethno-nationalist state.

Just recently, the Israeli government endorsed the Nation-State Bill, which among many racist provisions, calls for the establishment of Jewish-only towns. This bill alone should be enough to settle the silly debate on whether Israel can be both a Jewish nation-state and a democracy.

But relations between Israel and its lobby groups and racist, neo-Nazi and fascist organisations go way deeper than a one-off gala dinner with Steve Bannon. In fact, in Europe, Israel is actively pursuing alliances with far-right groups and parties as a state policy.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Sat Sep 15, 2018 3:50 am

.
Newly released British files reveal that it was accepted by an official British secret investigation, that rise in ill-will toward Jews in Britain by 1943 was NOT as a result of irrational racist prejudice, but was an understandable reaction to the behaviour of Jews generally.

This has just been reported (with spin) in Britain in The Times newspaper.
It has also been reported in Israel in one of their top newspapers:
The Times of israel wrote: In a May 1943 report to Brendan Bracken — a close confidant of Winston Churchill who served as Minister of Information for much of the war — the ministry’s top civil servant suggested that “there had been a considerable increase in anti-Semitic feeling” since the outbreak of the conflict nearly four years prior.

Cyril Radcliffe — the ministry’s director general — related how regional officials he had called to a meeting on the subject “regard it as quite beyond argument that the increase of anti-Semitic feeling was caused by serious errors of conduct on the part of Jews.”

The picture appeared similar in both rural parts of the country and the big industrial cities, as well as in areas, such as Manchester and Leeds, with long-established Jewish communities, and others where few Jews lived.

Radcliffe suggested that resentment against Jewish evacuees was a factor in stoking tensions. Jews, he advised Bracken, had displayed “a lack of pleasant standards of conduct as evacuees”.

A further source of complaints reported to him by the ministry’s regional civil servants was the allegation that Jews had “an inordinate attention to the possibilities of the ‘black market’”.

Rationing had produced an illegal trade in goods such as food, clothing and petrol, which allowed those who could afford it to escape the worst of wartime shortages and restrictions.
In his memo to Brendan Bracken of his meeting with the officials, Radcliffe wrote: “I reminded them that it was part of the tragedy of the Jewish position that their peculiar qualities that one could well admire in easier times of peace, such as their commercial initiative and drive, and their determination to preserve themselves as an independent community in the midst of the nations they lived in, were just the things that told against them in wartime when a nation dislikes the struggle for individual advantages and feels the need for homogeneity above everything else.”
Referring to a March 1943 stampede at a bomb shelter in the East End’s Bethnal Green that killed 173 people — and which had been falsely blamed on panicking Jews — Radcliffe wrote: “If specific stories hostile to the Jews could be traced and pinned down as untruths, such as the recent canard of the Jews being responsible for the London shelter disaster, this should be done by countering it with the individuals who were putting it about, not by giving it general publicity.”

...After a high-profile black market case in Salford in Greater Manchester, a local Ministry of Information civil servant reported to London that there had been “anxiety among the Jews culminating in the visit of two representative Jews to the regional office.”

At the meeting, the community’s emissaries suggested employers were discriminating against Jews, highlighting the fact that local councils were — despite shortages — failing to employ Jewish nurses. Their concerns went unheeded.
of his meeting with the officials, Radcliffe wrote: “It appears that the Jewish leaders are so anxious to avoid admitting that ‘The People’ have been especially blameworthy in black markets that they are unwilling to take strong spiritual and communal action. Blindness to facts and alternate periods of arrogance and whines are unlikely to endear the Jewish cause to Britain.”
...One civil servant examined the weekly reports of the Special Branch — the police unit which works with Britain’s security services to combat extremism and subversion at home — for examples of anti-Semitism. He listed six instances dating back over the previous six months. They included stickers plastered on doors and windows of businesses in the heavily Jewish area of Shoreditch in the East End which featured two Jews and the words: “Britannia rules the waves — yeth, but we rule Britannia”; a fascist publication; a far-right pamphlet which blamed Jews for anti-Semitism; and anti-Semitic graffiti such as “Down with the filthy Jews” and “burn the Jews” in parts of London, Manchester and Hove, a seaside town in southeast England with a large Jewish population.

“You will agree that there is nothing in all this to suggest anything in the nature of organised activity, at any rate on an important scale,” the official wrote. The colleague to whom his memo was passed wrote dismissively on it: “I did not think that Mrs. Corbett Ashby’s account showed signs of careful consideration.”

...As The Times notes, “the depths of the horrors uncovered by the liberators” in 1945 meant that “anti-Semitism became taboo.” However, the paper added, “there was a price to pay for the British authorities’ tolerance of anti-Semitism” during the war. It cited the anti-Jewish rioting which occurred in 1947 in the UK after the Irgun hanged two British sergeants in mandate-era Palestine in retaliation for the execution of three of its members.

Although nobody was killed, the violence — which was worst in Liverpool and Manchester in northwest England and the Scottish city of Glasgow — shocked many. Even the newspapers which had sensationalized the British soldiers’ murder swiftly called for calm, branding the weekend’s disturbances “a national disgrace.”

Moreover, while events in Palestine had been the immediate cause, the link between wartime anti-Semitism and its thankfully brief violent post-war manifestation was a clear one. Britain was already struggling under the weight of the cost of the war and reconstruction, with austerity imposed by the government and rationing and controls still largely in place. In 1947, these difficulties were compounded by a sharp economic downturn and rising unemployment.

Jews, historian Tony Kushner has suggested, became a scapegoat, being seen as “black marketeers gaining from the war but not contributing to the effort.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/as-holoca ... -semitism/

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:19 am

.
Jews in the Jewish State of Israel calim and boast that their the Jewish State can and isallowed to ignore international law’ anywhere it wants
The Israeli government has recently claimed that it can “legislate anywhere in the world”, that it is “entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign countries”, and that “is allowed to ignore the directives of international law in any field it desires”. This was written in an official response letter to the Supreme Court last month.

The State of Israel, in the recent response letter (Hebrew) to the court (filed August 7th), claimed in its defense that:

[1] ‘The Knesset has no limitation which prevents it from legislating extra-territorially anywhere in the world,

Having made that statement, the Israeli government goes on to rebuff the plaintiffs’ claim that it cannot legislate there and goes further to suggest that it is not at all subject to the directives of international law:

[4] ‘…Although the Knesset can legislate [concerning] any place in the world, although it is entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign countries through legislation that would be applied to events occurring in their territories […], although it is within the authority of the Government of Israel to annex any territory […], although the Knesset may ignore directives of international law in any area it pleases […] despite all these, the plaintiffs seek to define a “rule” by which precisely in Judea and Samaria the Knesset is prohibited from legislating anything, and that precisely there, and nowhere else in the world, it is subject to the directives of international law’.

Adalah Attorneys Suhad Bishara and Myssana Morany, were in disbelief:

“The Israeli government’s extremist response has no parallel anywhere in the world. It stands in gross violation of international law and of the United Nations Charter which obligates member states to refrain from threatening or using force against the territorial integrity of other states — including occupied territories. The Israeli government’s extremist position is, in fact, a declaration of its intention to proceed with its annexation of the West Bank.”

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Tue Sep 25, 2018 11:45 am

In the news today a Russian Jewish oligarch was refused permission to become a resident in Switzerland due to intelligence he has been involved in money laundering and other criminal activity
Roman Abramovich posed a threat
to public security, Swiss police said


Police reported ‘suspicion of money laundering
and presumed contacts with criminal organisations’

Switzerland’s federal police advised that the Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich posed a “threat to public security and a reputational risk” to the country if he became a resident, it has emerged. ...The allegations are not based on any court rulings, and the oligarch has never been indicted in Switzerland. They are based on police information ...

The Chelsea football club owner on Tuesday lost a seven-month legal battle against a newspaper publisher to prevent the publication of information on the reasons for his failure to secure Swiss residency.

In June 2017, Abramovich withdrew his Swiss residency application. Abramovich withdrew his application to renew his UK residency visa this spring. In May, the oligarch obtained Israeli citizenship.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... olice-said
Britain and Switzerland didn't want him but Israel accepted his residency application without question:
Roman Abramovich, the billionaire owner of Chelsea football club, has been granted Israeli citizenship and will move to Tel Aviv, an Israeli government spokesperson has said.

Abramovich had faced unusually long delays in renewing his UK visa, which had expired, sources told the Reuters news agency. The British government has declined to comment on his case.

Israel grants citizenship to any Jewish person wishing to move there and a passport can be issued immediately.
Israel’s media has speculated for days that the businessman was seeking citizenship. The Times of Israel said Abramovich would be exempt from paying tax in Israel for 10 years and would not need to explain the sources of his wealth in that time. Worth £8.6bn, according to Forbes magazine, Abramovich would instantly become the richest Israeli.

It is believed the British government would have required some financial disclosures if Abramovich’s UK visa was to be renewed.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... iv-chelsea
been-there wrote:
Sat Sep 15, 2018 3:50 am
Newly released British files reveal that it was accepted by an official British secret investigation, that rise in ill-will toward Jews in Britain by 1943 was NOT as a result of irrational racist prejudice, but was an understandable reaction to the behaviour of Jews generally.

This has just been reported (with spin) in Britain in The Times newspaper.
It has also been reported in Israel in one of their top newspapers:
The Times of israel wrote: In a May 1943 report to Brendan Bracken — a close confidant of Winston Churchill who served as Minister of Information for much of the war — the ministry’s top civil servant suggested that “there had been a considerable increase in anti-Semitic feeling” since the outbreak of the conflict nearly four years prior.

Cyril Radcliffe — the ministry’s director general — related how regional officials he had called to a meeting on the subject “regard it as quite beyond argument that the increase of anti-Semitic feeling was caused by serious errors of conduct on the part of Jews.”

The picture appeared similar in both rural parts of the country and the big industrial cities, as well as in areas, such as Manchester and Leeds, with long-established Jewish communities, and others where few Jews lived.

Radcliffe suggested that resentment against Jewish evacuees was a factor in stoking tensions. Jews, he advised Bracken, had displayed “a lack of pleasant standards of conduct as evacuees”.

A further source of complaints reported to him by the ministry’s regional civil servants was the allegation that Jews had “an inordinate attention to the possibilities of the ‘black market’”.

Rationing had produced an illegal trade in goods such as food, clothing and petrol, which allowed those who could afford it to escape the worst of wartime shortages and restrictions.
In his memo to Brendan Bracken of his meeting with the officials, Radcliffe wrote: “I reminded them that it was part of the tragedy of the Jewish position that their peculiar qualities that one could well admire in easier times of peace, such as their commercial initiative and drive, and their determination to preserve themselves as an independent community in the midst of the nations they lived in, were just the things that told against them in wartime when a nation dislikes the struggle for individual advantages and feels the need for homogeneity above everything else.”
Referring to a March 1943 stampede at a bomb shelter in the East End’s Bethnal Green that killed 173 people — and which had been falsely blamed on panicking Jews — Radcliffe wrote: “If specific stories hostile to the Jews could be traced and pinned down as untruths, such as the recent canard of the Jews being responsible for the London shelter disaster, this should be done by countering it with the individuals who were putting it about, not by giving it general publicity.”

...After a high-profile black market case in Salford in Greater Manchester, a local Ministry of Information civil servant reported to London that there had been “anxiety among the Jews culminating in the visit of two representative Jews to the regional office.”

At the meeting, the community’s emissaries suggested employers were discriminating against Jews, highlighting the fact that local councils were — despite shortages — failing to employ Jewish nurses. Their concerns went unheeded.
of his meeting with the officials, Radcliffe wrote: “It appears that the Jewish leaders are so anxious to avoid admitting that ‘The People’ have been especially blameworthy in black markets that they are unwilling to take strong spiritual and communal action. Blindness to facts and alternate periods of arrogance and whines are unlikely to endear the Jewish cause to Britain.”
...One civil servant examined the weekly reports of the Special Branch — the police unit which works with Britain’s security services to combat extremism and subversion at home — for examples of anti-Semitism. He listed six instances dating back over the previous six months. They included stickers plastered on doors and windows of businesses in the heavily Jewish area of Shoreditch in the East End which featured two Jews and the words: “Britannia rules the waves — yeth, but we rule Britannia”; a fascist publication; a far-right pamphlet which blamed Jews for anti-Semitism; and anti-Semitic graffiti such as “Down with the filthy Jews” and “burn the Jews” in parts of London, Manchester and Hove, a seaside town in southeast England with a large Jewish population.

“You will agree that there is nothing in all this to suggest anything in the nature of organised activity, at any rate on an important scale,” the official wrote. The colleague to whom his memo was passed wrote dismissively on it: “I did not think that Mrs. Corbett Ashby’s account showed signs of careful consideration.”

...As The Times notes, “the depths of the horrors uncovered by the liberators” in 1945 meant that “anti-Semitism became taboo.” However, the paper added, “there was a price to pay for the British authorities’ tolerance of anti-Semitism” during the war. It cited the anti-Jewish rioting which occurred in 1947 in the UK after the Irgun hanged two British sergeants in mandate-era Palestine in retaliation for the execution of three of its members.

Although nobody was killed, the violence — which was worst in Liverpool and Manchester in northwest England and the Scottish city of Glasgow — shocked many. Even the newspapers which had sensationalized the British soldiers’ murder swiftly called for calm, branding the weekend’s disturbances “a national disgrace.”

Moreover, while events in Palestine had been the immediate cause, the link between wartime anti-Semitism and its thankfully brief violent post-war manifestation was a clear one. Britain was already struggling under the weight of the cost of the war and reconstruction, with austerity imposed by the government and rationing and controls still largely in place. In 1947, these difficulties were compounded by a sharp economic downturn and rising unemployment.

Jews, historian Tony Kushner has suggested, became a scapegoat, being seen as “black marketeers gaining from the war but not contributing to the effort.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/as-holoca ... -semitism/
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 8215
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

Post by been-there » Tue Oct 09, 2018 2:03 am

Image

Image
Here is info on two books by Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty the man who was portayed as Mr. X in Oliver Stone's film 'JFK'.
Leroy Fletcher Prouty served as Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President John F. Kennedy.
Before that he had been a colonel in the United States Air Force. He left after Kennedy's assassination, in 1964 and sought employment as a civilian.

Colonel Prouty wrote that he believed Kennedy's assassination was a coup d'etat, and that there is a secret, global "power elite" which operates covertly to protect its interests — and in doing so has frequently subverted democracy around the world.

“The power elite is not a group from one nation or even of one alliance of nations.
It operates throughout the world and no doubt has done so for many, many centuries.”

“CIA Director Allen Dulles and his brother Secretary of State John Foster Dulles were in touch with the power elite,
and a mere President [Eisenhower] influenced them not at all.
So many qualified people who have worked "close to the seat of power" ...confirm
that these so-called [government] leaders get their instructions from a very high source.
These "leaders" are all fine actors, and certainly not true rulers...
This is true not only in the world of politics but is equally true of banking, industry, academia, and religion”.

Image
Prouty, who was a Washington insider for nearly 20 years — in the last few of them as Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Kennedy — has a highly unusual perspective to offer on the assassination and the events that led up to it. Familiar to moviegoers as the original of the anonymous Washington figure, played by Donald Sutherland in the Oliver Stone's movie JFK , who asks hero Jim Garrison to ponder why Kennedy was killed, Prouty leaves no doubt where he stands.
Image
The president, he claims, had angered the military-industrial establishment with his procurement policies and his determination to withdraw from Vietnam, and had threatened to break the CIA into "a thousand pieces'' after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. His death was in effect a coup d'etat that placed in the White House a very different man with a very different approach — one much more acceptable to what Prouty consistently calls "the power elite".

Although he declares that such an elite has operated, supranationally, throughout history, and is all-powerful, he never satisfactorily explains who its members are and how it functions — or how it has allowed the current East-West rapprochement to take place.

Still, this behind-the-scenes look at how the CIA has shaped postwar U.S. foreign policy is fascinating, as are Prouty's telling questions about the security arrangements in Dallas, his knowledge of the extraordinary government movements at that time (every member of the Cabinet was out of the country when Kennedy was shot) and his perception that most of the press has joined in the cover-up ever since.
Prouty wrote that he believed Kennedy's assassination was a coup d'etat, and that there is a secret, global "power elite," which operates covertly to protect its interests, and in doing so has frequently subverted democracy around the world.

What other global group has operated “supranationally" and “throughout history”??? And why couldn't Proust be more specific about who they were and are??

See more confirming and supporting this understanding and explaining WHY it can not be named here:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3417&p=132714#p132714
Image

Image
Image
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests