‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 10004
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
The obvious question that no media outlet mentions and no-one dare ask: ‘is she Jewish?’

British-Australian academic, jailed for spying for Israel, is freed by Iran

Image
Kylie Moore-Gilbert holds dual British and Australian citizenship, and is a fellow and lecturer in Islamic Studies focusing on politics in the Arab Gulf states, according to her biography on the University of Melbourne's website.

The website states that she graduated from the University of Cambridge in 2013 and completed her PhD at the University of Melbourne four years later. According to Australian state broadcaster ABC, she was in Iran in 2018 to start a course in the city of Qom when she was detained.

In 2019, Iranian judiciary spokesman Gholamhossein Esmaili said Moore-Gilbert had been "spying for another country." Moore-Gilbert was tried and sentenced to ten years in prison.
Kylie Moore-Gilbert is an Australian-British academic and expert on Islamic studies. She is a lecturer in Islamic studies at the University of Melbourne's Asia Institute and has carried out research into revolutions in the Middle East, in particular Bahraini politics and protests. From September 2018 to November 2020, she was imprisoned in Iran under a charge of espionage.
Kylie Moore-Gilbert is a Cambridge-educated scholar of Islamic studies, who worked as a lecturer at the University of Melbourne. Iran said she had received training in espionage from Israeli intelligence and attempted to gather classified materials on Iran's economic and military affairs during her second visit to the country. She was arrested in September 2018 as she was leaving Tehran.

...the Iranian government has agreed to release 33-year-old Kylie Moore-Gilbert. She was serving a 10-year prison sentence after being tried and convicted as an Israeli spy in 2018.

Iranian media said her release was made in exchange for securing the freedom of three Iranian citizens, who were held in a foreign prison.

Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne said she was "extremely pleased and relieved" by Moore-Gilbert's release, while reiterating that her government was rejecting the grounds for her arrest and conviction. The academic denied any wrongdoing and staged several hunger protests during her incarceration.
And compare the Main-stream-Media’s emotionally-manipulative reporting of a convicted Israeli spy with whistle-blowing journalists who expose Western Governments crimes (e.g. Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowdon, etc).
Assange can face psychological torture and solitary confinement in Belmarsh prison in Britain for exposing American crimes.
But this woman convicted of being a Jewish spy was supposedly in a “living hell”??! :roll:

Image

Here is the only sign of Kylie’s Jewish self-identity that I could find.
The Jewish community of Australia before her release were urging fellow-Jews that they must campaign for her.
Hmmmm?
I wonder why they as a community of JEWS felt such a duty and responsibility???? :ugeek:

Image
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 10004
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

A world-wide people of predominantly European, ‘white’ ethnicity — but who self-identify as belonging to a wierd, secular/athiest, abstract, cultish tribe that believes it is superior to all other peoples — seem intent on provoking a war with Iran while the easily manipulated orange-man President is still in the White House.
Israel behind hit on architect of Iranian nuclear weapons program

Three intelligence officials tell Jew owned US news-outlet that Jerusalem is responsible for assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, as Iran vows ‘severe revenge’ for killing

By TOI STAFF | 27 November 2020

Israel was responsible for Friday’s assassination of Iran’s top nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, The New York Times reported, citing three unnamed intelligence officials.

The report came after several Iranian officials pointed the finger at the Jewish state for the hit on the man Israel and Western intelligence officials have identified as the leading figure in Tehran’s nuclear weapons program.

The newspaper report said it was not clear how much Washington knew ahead of the attack, though it noted that Israel and the US work closely on issues pertaining to Iran.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-be ... -ny-times/
Image
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 10004
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
Leaked Iranian information on Jewish-Zionist murder.

62 people involved in Jewish-zionist murder of Iranian top scientist

Iranian officials have blamed Israel's Mossad for the assassination.
One American official and two other intelligence officials also said that Israel was behind the attack.

The leaked info said that 12 members of the team, who are described as being highly trained and assisted by 'security and intelligence services abroad', were deployed to the city of Absard, 50 miles east of Tehran.

The mountain retreat of 10,000 people is where many Tehranis have second homes, and Fakhrizadeh, 59, had a villa there.

Another 50 people helped with logistical support. It did not specify whether they were in Iran, or abroad.
The team had been watching Fakhrizadeh, and knew that he was going to be driving from Tehran to Absard on Friday.
They planned the attack for a roundabout in Absard, at the foot of a tree-lined boulevard which enters the city.

Half an hour before Fakhrizadeh's convoy of three bulletproof cars arrived, the electricity was cut off to the area.

The team were in place when the first car passed the roundabout.
As the third car passes, the Nissan explodes, damaging electricity poles and transmitters, according to a state TV report from the area on Friday night.
The force of the explosion from the bomb hurled debris at least 300 meters, according to state television.
The second car, containing Fakhrizadeh, was then shot at by the 12 assassins, including two snipers.
The gunmen with the hit squad opened fire on the cars, and an intense gunfight ensued, according to Sepah Cybery, a social media channel affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

'According to Iranian leaks, the leader of the assassination team took Fakhrizadeh out of his car and shot him and made sure he was killed.'

The hit squad then vanished, having sustained no losses to their team.

Image

A Hyundai Santa Fe with four passengers, four motorcyles and two snipers were waiting for him at the scene of the ambush, along with a booby-trapped Nissan pickup.

Residents told state television that they heard the sound of a big explosion followed by intense machine gun fire as Fakhrizadeh's bodyguards fought back.

They knew the man they were protecting had for years been Mossad's number one target.

A police helicopter landed in the area to transport Fakhrizadeh and others to the hospital, according to a video posted by a resident who narrates the video saying 'several people are dead.'

When members of Fakhrizadeh's security detail arrived in hospital, they were surprised to find that there was no electricity, after the power had been cut. They were then transported to Tehran.

At 10:28am EST (7:30pm local time) on Friday, the Iranian foreign minister, Javad Zarif, said that 'an eminent Iranian scientist' had been killed, with the suspected aid of Israel.


User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 10004
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

Charles Traynor wrote:
Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:40 pm
Why would anyone not have complete trust in CNN?

Image
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Turnagain
Posts: 10054
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by Turnagain »

And CNN is Huntinger's number one, go to "news" source for his political views on the eeevul Orange Man and the saintly but senile Joe and his Ho.

BTW, b-t have you noticed how often the term "domestic terrorists" is being bandied about by CNN et al.? It seems to be the buzz-phrase du jour. Are we being prepped for a new "Patriot Act 2.0"? Since the election seems to have been successfully stolen, the "liberals" seem to be intent on tightening their grip on the goyim.

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 10004
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
The Jewish role in moulding public perception of WW2 — then and now.

Anyone who wants to understand the current view of what is nebulously referred to as 'the Holocaust' and who wants to impartially understand WW2 will HAVE to understand the Jewish role in moulding public perception of that.

Jews and Jewish-controlled mass-media, with Jewish advisers to governments (Samuel Untermyer, Fredrick Lindemann, Leo Amery, Ivan Maisky, Henry Morgantheau, Bernard Baruch, William C. Bullitt, etc., etc.,) have been moulding public perception of that war:
• from BEFORE it even started,
• to helping causing it,
• to helping mobilise public support for waging it against Germany,
• for demonising Hitler prior to and after the war,
• for publicising false atrocity propaganda against the entire German nation during the war and AFTER it was over,
• and for still today creating a compulsory narrative regarding WW2, the European Jewish experience of it and of the NSDAP.

Remember that it was organisations representing world Jewry who decided on a public show-trial of high ranking Germans at Nuremberg for ‘war crimes’ after WW2. None of the victor leaders (who knew that they themselves were war-criminal mass-murderers of millions of deliberately targeted civilians: Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt and Truman) — wanted that initially.

Here is an aricle bragging about the key role of three Jews operating behind the scenes in initiating and influencing the Nuremberg show-trials.
One of these Jews admits that Jewish organisations had been working on this mission to elevate awareness of only Jewish war-time suffering since the winter of 1939-1940! [Think about that for a moment]
Since the establishment of the Institute for Jewish Affairs, [Jew] Jacob Robinson of the Institute and it's team had laboured to make the make the point that the massacre of European Jewry was a unique and distinct crime. “We have been working in this field for four and a half years” he wrote to Jackson in June 1945.
...Close study of World Jewish Congress archive materials by Professor Mark Lewis... [show that] Robinson and the World Jewish Congress more than anything else wanted recognition of the Germans’ crimes against the Jewish people as a whole. “The crimes committed against the Jews were …one collective crime directed against a people — a crime [that] started when Hitler took power” as Robinson explained to the Institute’s staff in December 1944.

In the lead up to the Nuremberg Trial, [Jew] Sir Hersch Lauterpacht (the Whewell Professor of International Law at the University of Cambridge) ardently urged the British authorities to pursue Nazi war criminals when the war was over, and he tried, unsuccessfully, to persuade the London-based United Nations War Crimes Commission to establish a special unit to look into anti-Jewish crimes.
https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-a ... -nuremberg
Remember also that according to the man who was the executive trial counsel and supervisor for the United States team in Nuremberg, about 75% of the Nuremberg 'team' who orchestrated that 'show-trial' were Jews. As anyone who critically and impartially looks into this will know and learn, these 'Jews' were “pushing, crowding and competing with each other and with everyone” in a quest for both revenge and world publicity of the Allied atrocity propaganda now known and worshipped as 'THE Holocaust'. Jewish prosecutors, Jewish investigators, Jewish translators, Jewish interrogators, Jewish prison psychiatrists, Jewish clerics, etc., etc.

Saying this fact publically will be a cause to get yourself reviled, rebuked and even punished for supposedly repeating anti-semitic hate tropes. This is the situation society has now reached, when speaking the truth has become treated as a thought-crime.

Here it is though, written in a letter to his wife on September 25, 1945 and revealed to the world by his son:
Thomas J. Dodd wrote:“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial, for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter — it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else.”
Jews not only created that war for Jewish self-interests, they brag about how they have moulded public perceptions towards that war.
Image

In addition to his articulate and learned case for the need to prosecute war crimes and to establish individual criminal responsibility, summed up in an influential article he published in 1944, [Jew] Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s distinct contribution to the Nuremberg Trial, written into Article 6 of the IMT, is now widely recognised to have been helping to formulate the notion of a tripartite definition of Nazi criminality (crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity) and in particular the idea of the latter — clearly one of the major legal innovations of the trial.
“Crimes against humanity” — later referred to by Jackson as having been suggested by an “eminent scholar of international law” now acknowledged to have been Lauterpacht — derived from the Americans’ concern, at the London planning conference that assembled in the summer of 1945 to plan the trial, about capturing Nazi crimes that, while associated with the war, were committed both before the outbreak of the conflict in 1939 and also were perpetrated against victims in the Germans’ own population.
Lauterpacht, I should add, also played an important role in the drafting of the speeches for his friend the first British chief prosecutor Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe and then, when the Conservatives were replaced by Labour, his successor the new attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross.
That article brags about the influence of certain Jews who acted behind the scenes — bragging that they invented terms such as 'genocide' and even wrote the speeches of the chief prosecutors.

Factor in to this understanding of Jewish contrived post-war injustice and vengeance, that the key Third Reich personnel who could dispute and expose the holocaust mythology were being interrogated and tortured principally by German-speaking Jews or were conveniently found dead (murdered?) in custody.

Heinrich Himmler is the most obvious example of that. He very credibly denied any policy to mass-murder Jews in April 1945 to the Jewish representative for Sweden of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) a man named Norbert Masur.
Few people today have ever heard of Mr. Masur nor know of his account of his meeting with Himmler so soon before Himmler's convenient death — allegedly by suicide — whilst in British custody. Think why that is.

Remember also that the last Auschwitz Kommandant Richared Baer not only denied any mass-gassing programme at Auschwitz but ridiculed the gullibility of people to believe such obviously impractical nonsense narratives. He also died in captivity, dying in his cell shortly before a public trial.
Few people today have ever heard of Mr. Baer nor know of his informed rebuttal of the emerging 'Holocaust' mass-gassing mythology.
Think, why is it that no-one knows his name, yet almost everyone has heard of Dr. Mengele?
Mind-control, mental manipulation, mass-conditioning is the explanation.

Recall also that Josef Kramer stayed at his post to hand over Bergen-Belsen to the British in order to prevent an outbreak of Typhus spreading outside the camp. For this humanitarian devotion to duty — and for the well-being of all, civilian, British military, whoever — he was treated abominably and finally hanged. The British Officers who reneged on the agreement of the hand-over of the camp were British Jews.
Three Jewish men were among the first British soldiers who entered the liberated [Bergen-Belsen] camp on April 15, 1944. Among these liberators was Captain Derek Sington, a young man working for British Intelligence at the time these events occurred. Sington appears to have been one of the designated senior officials to first enter Belsen. His written account of the camp’s liberation indicates that he acted with ... the camp commander, Josef Kramer, who was waiting just outside of the main camp to greet and escort the British troops upon arrival.
...On the morning of April 18th, after having spent [three] days and nights in a vile underground cellar enveloped in total darkness, Josef Kramer was taken out of his cell and prepared for transfer out of the camp. The former commandant was manhandled and shackled, both hands and legs. The shackles were much too small for his enormous wrists and cut gaping gashes into his flesh. Kramer was then prodded into a jeep, his shirt ripped from his back, and paraded throughout the camp half-naked, to the accompaniment of jeers, hooting, catcalls, and a resonant howling which sounded to one witness as a “terrifying blend of joy and hate.”
Insults and accusations were not the only items thrown at Kramer. Whatever object the inmates could lay their hands on was thrown at Kramer as he crouched as low as he could in the vehicle, trying to avoid any potentially damaging missiles. Two British soldiers were poised directly behind Kramer, constantly prodding him in the spine with their sten guns, which was a cause for great jubilation among the gleeful inmates, and provoked them to howling with “joy and hate.” After he had been duly exposed to the contempt and wrath of the inmates, Kramer was driven out of the compound, amidst a hail of garbage and debris, never to return.
Kramer is another who initially denied any knowledge of a mass-gassing policy, but after coercion/‘interrogation’/torture he changed his testimony and accepted the lynching that victor-justice had pre-destined for him.
KRAMER DENIES HIS GUILT
LÜNEBURG, Wednesday.

"All died from natural causes", protested Kramer in a statement read In court in which
he declared that the allegations of mass executions in the gas chambers
and of whippings at Auschwitz were untrue from beginning to end
.
Image
Image

Oswald Pohl is another chief SS Officer who categorically denied a mass-gassing policy.
Pohl became the third most powerful figure in the SS, behind Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heydrich.
Reading the Jewish-controlled and policed Wikipedia stubs of these two men Kramer and Pohl, you would never know they refuted the mass-gassing narrative.

But this is how our history is currently being censored and effectively re-written by TV, junk journalism and social media like Wikipedia and Quora, all largely controlled, owned or influenced by people who see themselves as Jews first and foremost, with tribal loyalties to World Jewry before country or nation.

Jews — via the social-media online businesses they own — are currently involved in erasing the history that reveals all this. Wikipedia, Youtube, Facebook, Quora, Google, etc., etc., are currently censoring the net and eradicating content using the excuse of removing 'anti-semitic' content.

And stating the factual, verifiable truth of this is silenced and criminalised as "anti-semitism".

Hitler, Göring, Frank, Kaltenbrunner, Himmler, Ribbentropp: the list of high-ranking Third Reich Officers who denied the mass gassing allegations is not only extremely long, it is a 100% consistent rebuttal of the accusation as a lie. THEY ALL CATEGORICALLY DENIED ANY INVOLVEMENT OR KNOWLEDGE OF IT !!!
Yet, most people you talk to today not only do not know this, they delusionally believe the opposite, that the vast majority confessed to being involved.
How is this possible!!?? How can so many people believe the diametrical opposite of the truth?

Joseph Goebbels is another who when asked, categorically denied the mass-gassing atrocity propaganda. Yet who knows this today? According to Goebbel's senior colleaugue Dr. Hans Fritszche, Goebbels said “the gas trucks that they mentioned in the Russian trial were a product of someone's fevered imagination, without any basis whatsoever in fact”.
[Hans Fritzsche, June 26th 1946. IMT xvii, pg. 200]

Yet facts such as these are not only never mentioned by main-stream media, TV documentaries or journalists, but the EXACT OPPOSITE is promulgated.

What happened then at that time — the silencing and concealment of truth through murder, intimidation, coercion, bribery, blackmail, and behind-the-scenes influence, by organised world jewry — is still happening now.

That is why British media tycoon Robert Maxwell was murdered by the Israeli intelligence agency.
Maxwell was a 'Jewish' millionaire and spy for Israel and had links to organised crime in Eastern Europe.
Robert Maxwell was one of Israel's super-spys, who received a state funeral in Israel. It was attended by former Israeli PMs and an Israeli former President who praised him. Six serving and former heads of Israeli intelligence services attended Maxwell's funeral in Israel, and then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir stated: “He has done more for Israel than can today be said."
Yet Israel had Mossad agents murder Mr. Maxwell because he demanded Israel help him prop up his failing businesses OR he would expose his knowledge of Israeli secrets, crimes, treacherous activities, spy scandals, spyware, infiltration in world governments.

Now Jeffry Epstein is just one more high-profile, paedophile Jewish criminal spy. Either he has had a Kit Marlowe type of feigned death followed by a clandestine exile to somewhere, presumably Israel. Or Epstein has been murdered to silence him, as he threatened to do a Samson and bring down the whole temple of Israeli-Jewish crime and all its wicked acts IF he didn't get protection.

These latter-day events — and the false narratives about them that the masses are manipulated nto believing — help explain how Jews co-ordinating worldwide, maintain the bogus WW2 narrative in the minds of the masses and why revision of the falsehoods still cannot be openly discussed today.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

User avatar
been-there
Propositions Moderator
Posts: 10004
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:59 am
Contact:

Re: ‘International Jewry’? What was that prior to 1939? And what is it now?

Post by been-there »

.
Guardian columnist reveals he was fired over tweets criticizing Israel

RT News

https://www.rt.com/usa/515203-guardian- ... ed-israel/

Columnist Nathan J. Robinson has revealed that the Guardian fired him over a sarcastic tweet about US aid to Israel, even though he deleted it and agreed to never bring up the issue in hopes of keeping the job. “The moment I irritated defenders of Israel on social media, I was summarily fired from my job as a newspaper columnist,” Robinson wrote on Wednesday in Current Affairs, the magazine he edits … “You say the wrong thing, you lose your position. No second chances. You will be tarred as an anti-Semite and your job will disappear.

... ... ... ... ... ...

How the media cracks down on critics of Israel

by Nathan J. Robinson — Current Affairs

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2021/02/ ... -of-israel

It is widely recognized that critics of Israel, no matter how well-founded the criticism, are routinely punished by both public and private institutions for their speech. … The effort to keep critics of Israel quiet sometimes takes the form of explicit government action … The moment I irritated defenders of Israel on social media, I was summarily fired from my job as a newspaper columnist There is no “three strikes” policy when it comes to criticism of Israel, no matter how justified the criticism, and no matter how far it falls from actual anti-Semitism. It did not matter that I swiftly deleted my words. You cross the line, you’re gone … I have noticed that a lot of people who are ostensibly pro-free speech have little to say when critics of Israel are met with professional consequences.

... ... ... ... ... ...

Another Zionist joins the Biden team

by Philip Giraldi

https://councilforthenationalinterest.o ... iden-team/

It does not require any particularly perspicacity to realize that the President Joe Biden Administration has been loaded with Zionists who not only believe in their own vision for Greater Israel but also in some cases have strong and enduring ties to the Israeli government itself. The new Secretary of State Tony Blinken comes from an American Jewish family that has well established ties to Israel … If [President George] Washington were to see the foreign policy ruined by the Israel-centric federal government that has prevailed since the time of Ronald Reagan he would surely be at a loss to understand how that could possibly have developed … We Americans are, at our peril, never allowed to challenge the extent of someone’s devotion to a foreign country if that country just happens to be Israel.

.. .. .. .. .. ..

How the film 'The Sound of Music' distorts history

by Mark Weber

http://www.ihr.org/other/weber2011soundofmusic.html

“The Sound of Music” is perhaps the most popular American musical picture ever produced. But whatever its merits as entertainment, the film’s presentation of history is deceitful. In particular, its portrayal of the 1938 union or Anschluss of Austria with the German Reich is a gross distortion of historical reality.

.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

Israel was behind the murder of Iranian nuclear scientist, a Jewish weekly reports

Reuters

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran ... SKBN2AA2RC

The Iranian nuclear scientist assassinated near Tehran in November was killed by a one-ton gun smuggled into Iran in pieces by the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, according to a report by The Jewish Chronicle on Wednesday. Citing intelligence sources, the British weekly said a team of more than 20 agents, including Israeli and Iranian nationals, carried out the ambush on scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh after eight months of surveillance. Reuters was not immediately able to confirm the report, which was published on the website of the London-based newspaper … The attack was carried out “by Israel alone, without American involvement” but that U.S. officials were given some form of notice beforehand.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth,
they either cease being mistaken
or they cease being honest"
-- Anonymous

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests