Turnagain wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:38 pm
If you want a quote from Black of the USHMM, go watch Hunt's video again.
It is the way you examine the witness evidence that is unique.
Your agenda is to disprove gassings, that is your belief. You do not start with an open mind intending to follow the evidence.
On the contrary, you have it arse to front, Nessie. A good many years ago a family member said that the holocaust was a hoax; it didn't happen. At the time I was a true believer. I had seen films and photos and firmly believed that the holyhoax had actually occurred as advertised. Some modest research would prove my family member wrong. Imagine my chagrin when I discovered that I was wrong. I had been taken in like a country rube by slick carney at the county fair. It pissed me off royally and you and your load of "what ifs" and "coulda woulda's" along with all of the rest of your weasel dodges pisses me off, too, which is why I bother to debunk your spurious claims. You're selling snake oil and I ain't buying.
You rely on "what ifs" and "coulda wouldas", not me. You have had to invent the mass transportation and accommodation of millions of people, without any evidence to back that up. You try and support your claim with nonsense that Jews or Soviets or both coulda got to all of the witnesses and persuaded or coerced them all into lying.
You then claim that since the witnesses lied about gassings, burials and cremations, you can dismiss the physical evidence that backs the witnesses up as inadequate.
There isn't any physical evidence to back up the claims of your obviously lying witnesses.
That is a lie, pure and simple.
You present such bullshit as, "Somebody said that they saw tons of cremains laying on the ground" and call that evidence. When asked for samples, laboratory tests or the positive results of GPR scans, you do nothing but weasel dodge and claim that I dismiss physical evidence. Your so-called witnesses DID lie and you have no physical evidence.
You dodge that lab testing was done for remains found at Sobibor and that there are GPR scans in C S-C report. You act as if you are a trained and knowledgeable forensic scientist and archaeologist, who is able to peer review the work of professionals.
You present NO physical evidence to back up your claims. You have nothing to show large areas of undisturbed ground at the AR camps or a lack of cremated remains.
You then claim that since you have supposedly proved no gassings, therefore everyone left the camp, despite there being no evidence of that happening.
What the hell do you mean there's no evidence that deportees left Treblinka? Not only is there very credible eyewitness testimony to deportees leaving T-II but there's the records from the USHMM.
You claim everyone left the camp based on the evidence that only 1% of arrivals left the camp.
No historian, archaeologist, forensic scientist or criminal investigator works that way. They all understand that you cannot prove one thing happened, by disproving another did not happen.
More bullshit from Nessie. There has always been a discrepancy between the Indian's account of the battle of the Little Bighorn and the popular account of how it occurred. A team of archaeologists and other scientists undertook a forensic examination of the battle site. The location of the fallen soldier's bodies was partially known and the course of the battle was determined in large part by the cartridges found by the archaeologists. It soon became clear that the Indian's account of the battle was correct.
That witnesses claimed something happened and then an archaeological examination confirmed what the witnesses said, is what has happened with the AR camps. Those archaeologists did not claim something that they cannot evidence happened. You do.
You are demanding that we ignore the evidence of the Indians and archaeologists and we believe in the popular account.
That is a clear case of proving one thing happened and not another.
Indeed, as the archaeologists found evidence, and they went with what is evidenced. You demand we believe in what is not evidenced.
If the Jews weren't murdered at Treblinka then something else happened to them.
Only if you ignore the evidence they were murdered and you believe something else which is not evidenced.
It could be claimed that they left for Alpha Centauri on a mother ship. It could also be claimed that the eeevul Narzis transported then via time travel to the prehistoric past. Perhaps they were vaporized with atomic energy. Occam's razor says that the Jews were just transported to other camps. Your claim is bullshit, Nessie.
Occam's razor does not say believe what is not evidenced to have happened. If c2.5 million people were transported to and accommodated in camps, that would have left evidence. It is impossible to do that without leaving evidence.
Is it possible to build a brick pressure vessel? No.
You are assuming that the Nazis did not know about dealing with pressure and how to manage it.
Is it possible to dig and stockpile a 15 meter deep pit using only a M&H model mA or mB dragline? No.
You are assuming that was the only excavator available to the Nazis.
Is it possible to exhume whole cadavers with a clamshell equipped dragline? No.
You are assuming it was a clamshell dragline and only whole bodies were ever exhumed.
Is it possible to cremate human cadavers without any fuel? No.
You are assuming no fuel was used.
Can records be lost or deliberately destroyed? Of course they can.
You are assuming that only very specific records were lost or destroyed in some sort of bizarre conspiracy.