'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31394
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Nessie »

been-there wrote:
Sat Jan 25, 2014 9:04 am
In view of it being time for all good sheeple to be reminded, to accept uncritically and unintelligently, and to be reindoctrinated again with the exaggerations, the demonisations, and the mythological aspects of the genuine persecution of Jewry in Europe during WW2....
Deniers spend far too much time reading debunked atrocity stories, hearsay and rumour and define what happened during the Holocaust from that most unreliable and incredible evidence. Deniers should stick to eye witness evidence, documents, physical evidence, forensics and archaeology.

That way deniers would be less inclined to indoctrinated themselves :roll:
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!


User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 9434
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Huntinger »


Deniers spend far too much time reading debunked atrocity stories, hearsay and rumour and define what happened during the Holocaust from that most unreliable and incredible evidence. Deniers should stick to eye witness evidence, documents, physical evidence, forensics and archaeology.

That way deniers would be less inclined to indoctrinated themselves :roll:
This poster is of the opinion revisionists are born as such. For some reason he cannot comprehend that most revisionists are so because the evidence presented so far falls short of the standard of acceptance. It appears the poster has indoctrinated himself with a false belief.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

Turnagain
Posts: 10065
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
I have linked you to the appropriate threads where witnesses and physical evidence is provided. Stop trolling this thread.
IOW, you have NO credible Jew witness nor can you show the mass graves and the tons of cremains. Gee, whoda' thunk it?

Turnagain
Posts: 10065
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
Deniers spend far too much time reading debunked atrocity stories, hearsay and rumour and define what happened during the Holocaust from that most unreliable and incredible evidence.
Debunk the claim that the steam/gas/vacuum chambers were hermetically sealed. That's incontrovertible proof, not your "what if" and "coulda woulda".
Deniers should stick to eye witness evidence, documents, physical evidence, forensics and archaeology.
We do. That's why we don't believe such unmitigated bullshit.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31394
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Nessie »

Huntinger wrote:
Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:53 pm

Deniers spend far too much time reading debunked atrocity stories, hearsay and rumour and define what happened during the Holocaust from that most unreliable and incredible evidence. Deniers should stick to eye witness evidence, documents, physical evidence, forensics and archaeology.

That way deniers would be less inclined to indoctrinated themselves :roll:
This poster is of the opinion revisionists are born as such. For some reason he cannot comprehend that most revisionists are so because the evidence presented so far falls short of the standard of acceptance. It appears the poster has indoctrinated himself with a false belief.
Deniers cherry pick a small amount of evidence that they can debunk and then claim, look no evidence. But they are fooling themselves and everyone else can see that there is actually no evidence to back up denier claims. It is deniers who are indoctrinated.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

Turnagain
Posts: 10065
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Turnagain »

Nessie wrote:
Deniers cherry pick a small amount of evidence that they can debunk and then claim, look no evidence.
Says the poster who can't even present one Jew eyewitness to the alleged events at Treblinka. Neither has he a reasonable explanation for what dug and stockpiled the graves, performed the exhumations or give a reasonable explanation for how the magic Jew barbeque functioned. Suuuuure, Nessie, revisionists just "cherry pick" a small amount of evidence.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31394
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Nessie »

Turnagain wrote:
Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:52 pm
Nessie wrote:
Deniers cherry pick a small amount of evidence that they can debunk and then claim, look no evidence.
Says the poster who can't even present one Jew eyewitness to the alleged events at Treblinka. Neither has he a reasonable explanation for what dug and stockpiled the graves, performed the exhumations or give a reasonable explanation for how the magic Jew barbeque functioned. Suuuuure, Nessie, revisionists just "cherry pick" a small amount of evidence.
You don't understand what cherry picking means. You asked for a witness and I gave you numerous witnesses and then you called it a laundry list. If I was cherry picking, I would have given you only one or two witnesses.

There is no indoctrination by historians, as they study ALL of the evidence and produce your so-called laundry lists. The indoctrination is by deniers, who look at only a tiny part of the evidence, ignore the rest and pretend that there is insufficient evidence, whilst ignoring the elephant in the room and the genuine lack of evidence for their belief of no mass gassings.

Been-there started this thread with a typical deneir appeal to atrocities, as those most extreme claims are cherry picked as if that is the only evidence :roll:
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 9434
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:08 pm
genuine lack of evidence for their belief of no mass gassings.
It is not a belief that is had, therefore no evidence is required. The burden of proof is on the claimants of mass gassing to prove there was such a thing. Show hard evidence of a single sand dweller gassed.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 31394
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Nessie »

Huntinger wrote:
Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:11 pm
Nessie wrote:
Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:08 pm
genuine lack of evidence for their belief of no mass gassings.
It is not a belief that is had, therefore no evidence is required. The burden of proof is on the claimants of mass gassing to prove there was such a thing. Show hard evidence of a single sand dweller gassed.
I have produced threads dedicated to the evidence. Please show your evidence of no gassings and what happened instead.
Consistency and standards in evidencing viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2721#p87772
My actual argument viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2834

Scott - On a side note, this forum is turning into a joke with the vicious attacks--and completely unnecessary vitriol--that everybody is making upon each other.

User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 9434
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh.Österreichisches Deutsch
Contact:

Re: 'Holocaust reindoctrination' prophylactic.

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:15 pm
I have produced threads dedicated to the evidence. Please show your evidence of no gassings and what happened instead.
One does not need to show evidence of a non event. For instance to not believe in a god does not require evidence of its nonexistence; the same is true of Santa and the tooth fairy. Any person claiming there is a god, Santa, tooth fairy needs to provide credible evidence, otherwise the claim is simply dismissed.

It has been given as evidence that the world population of judentum did not decrease significantly or disproportionately to most other groups in that era; there was no genocide.


𝖀𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖊 𝖉𝖆𝖘 𝕷𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖓, 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙 𝖆𝖚𝖘𝖇𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖊𝖓.
Amt IV

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 25 guests