Challenge to "Hannover"

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
Lily
Posts: 741
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by Lily »

Is that why he lost? :lol:
His points are there. Do you deny that fact?
Or perhaps you're afraid to actually look.

Searching the CODOH Forum for 'onetruth' = 182 results. :lol:

BTW: Eric Hunt deletes comments from his own site while griping about non-existent censorship at CODOH. He is registered at CODOH and is free to post. :lol:


Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!


Turnagain
Posts: 8035
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by Turnagain »

theblackravvitofinle said.
"You're not one for doing research then."

You are quite right, BRoI. Research into the holyhoax is mostly chasing discredited wartime propaganda. Trying to make it stick, such as your claim for the Gypsies in a ghetto, is an exercise in weasel dodging and half truths at best. Your link went to a Google list of ghettos for Jews. The Germans put a limited number of Gypsies, about 5,000, in one such ghetto, the Lodz ghetto. They occupied an area of just a little over four (4) acres inside the Jewish ghetto. So, were some Gypsies sent to a ghetto? Apparently yes. Were there any Gypsy ghettos? Apparently not. I didn't bother to read the entire listing, though.

I became interested in the tale of Treblinka some years ago and looked into the claims for the execution of ~850,000 Jews at that facility. What I found was that the fairy tales told by the so-called eyewitnesses were nothing but impossible bullshit. It follows that the claims made for Belzec and Sobibor are the same level of bullshit. Jews were sent to the camps, gassed en masse, buried in giant mass graves, exhumed, cremated on a magic Jew barbeque and reburied. The gas chambers, as described by the witnesses were nonfunctional. The giant mass graves cannot be found although the geophysical gear necessary to establish their existence has been available for years. Nobody has established the existence of 1.200-1,300 cubic meters of human cremains that would result from the cremation of ~850,000 people and nobody has ever given a satisfactory explanation for the operation of the magic Jew barbeque.

There are other technical objections to the claims of mass murder at Treblinka But that covers my main objections. Nobody, including you, BRoI, has ever been able to give a satisfactory explanation to those objections. I notice that hoaxers weasel dodge and frantically try to avoid those questions. Nessie is most expert at it with an entire litany of excuses and dodges. You seem to be getting quite proficient in that exercise, too, BRoI.

Turnagain
Posts: 8035
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by Turnagain »

theblackrabbitofinle said.
"I have in mind the kind of estimate which includes a figure for non-Jews who died in the camps. Have you forgotten already that you accepted that some did die in those camps?"

I don't know of any revisionist who claims that nobody died while incarcerated in a German concentration camp during WW II. The question is, were they killed as a result of government policy? You hoaxers have absolutely no proof of such an accusation. The principal cause of death in the camps was typhus. Again, you weasel dodge with your claim of, "people died in the camp, therefore the Germans intended to kill them." Curious how you hoaxers almost never give an unequivocal, direct answer to a question.

onetruth
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by onetruth »

Lily wrote:Is that why he lost? :lol:
His points are there. Do you deny that fact?
Or perhaps you're afraid to actually look.

Searching the CODOH Forum for 'onetruth' = 182 results. :lol:


You seem to miss the point Hannover,


It is not about you winning or losing,

No one cares much that you have failed as an historian .

The reason people here are at you , is that you failed as a human being.

Your bulling and abusive behavior , the abuse of your position as moderator , your throwing of insults at people that you know can't answer back , your make belief victory dances , while you know the answer that proved you wrong was just sent to oblivion.

Hardly the behavior of a decent human being . Which offends people basic desire for truth , their sense of justice and fair play. And i have not even begun with your mockery to the suffering of survivors , your disrespect for the dead and your insensitive psychopathic handling of this rather delicate historical subject.

That is why people here protest against you here. They would do it at CODOH , only you have made it impossible for them to write there.

You have also dogged my question , which is :

Why have you found it appropriate to removed my last post , pointing out that you knowingly used a fake image from the "ghost hunters" show to mislead people ?

Which is just a typical example out of many , of how you run things there , while abusing your position as zombie leader.

The fact that you have been allowed to keep in this position for so many years , is in indictment against all those behind the CODOH,




~

~

User avatar
theblackrabbitofinlé
Posts: 2094
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by theblackrabbitofinlé »

Aryan Scholar wrote:
theblackrabbitofinlé wrote:
Aryan Scholar wrote:Let me guess: you are implying "disinfected" is an euphemism for killed?
The same report mentions that the Reich will have saved an estimated 885,439,980 RM over a period of ten years, and 13,492,440 kilograms of meat by having "disinfected" these 70,273 disabled people.

If they were literally given a disinfection, how would that save the Reich so much money and meat?
By not letting those people have children.
You're implying claiming "disinfected" is a euphemism for "sterilised"!

What's your suggestion for what the author really meant by the word "Todestages"?

Menstrual cycle?
Due date?
Sexy time?
Unter Zugrundelegung des berechneten durchschnittlichen Tageskostenpreises bis zum 1. September 1941 erstandenen wirklichen Ersparnisse zu errechnen. Diese betragen — unter Nichtbeachtung des von uns bestimmten Todestages — Diese Ersparnisse setzen sich wie folgt monatlich zusammen:

Image
https://www.fold3.com/image/231944366
We just wish to point out to the court that is not a signed sworn statement of Dr. Bender but merely a translation of an alleged or purported statement of Dr. Bender, the original of which, like many other things, is not to be found today.
- Defence counsel, Dachau trial, 7 August 1947

SFinesilver
Posts: 1914
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 5:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by SFinesilver »

Turnagain:
The principal cause of death in the camps was typhus. Again, you weasel dodge with your claim of, "people died in the camp, therefore the Germans intended to kill them." Curious how you hoaxers almost never give an unequivocal, direct answer to a question.
First rule of delusionalism:

Never give an unequivocal, direct answer to a question.

Second rule of delusionalism:

Never give an unequivocal, direct answer to a question.

Third rule of delusionalism:

Never give an unequivocal, direct answer to a question.
D - Has it been alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, Germany used "resettlement to the east" as a euphemism for transiting jews to the so-called "top secret" - PURE EXTERMINATION CAMPS - Yes. - or - No. - ?? - Nessie's answer: Yes.

E - Has it been alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the so-called "pure extermination camps" were - THE END OF THE LINE - for virtually everyone transited to those camps - Yes. - or - No. - ?? - Nessie's answer: Yes.

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; during WW II, Germany actually transited jews to labor camps / ghettos - that were located east of the Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II camps - ?? - Nessie's answer: True.

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2078&start=210#p65945

User avatar
theblackrabbitofinlé
Posts: 2094
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by theblackrabbitofinlé »

Turnagain wrote:theblackrabbitofinle said.
"I have in mind the kind of estimate which includes a figure for non-Jews who died in the camps. Have you forgotten already that you accepted that some did die in those camps?"

I don't know of any revisionist who claims that nobody died while incarcerated in a German concentration camp during WW II. The question is, were they killed as a result of government policy? You hoaxers have absolutely no proof of such an accusation. The principal cause of death in the camps was typhus. Again, you weasel dodge with your claim of, "people died in the camp, therefore the Germans intended to kill them." Curious how you hoaxers almost never give an unequivocal, direct answer to a question.
Hoaxsters is a far better word. Seemingly, it was coined by Katherine Thomson in 1860:
But the hoax of hoaxes, the one which filled the papers of the time for several days, and which, eventually, made its author the very prince of hoaxsters, if such a term can be admitted, was that of Berners Street. Never, perhaps, was so much trouble expended, or so much attention devoted, to so frivolous an object.

- The Wits and Beaux of Society, 1860.

[Berners Street Hoax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berners_Street_hoax]
The rest of your post consists of:

- Two psychological projected claims about dodging. You, once again, failed to give your estimate
- Two ridiculous straw man assertions, one of which you've presented as a quotation.

I'm not going to bother responding to that tosh.

You seem to fill up entire threads of this forum with vapid BS. Are you paid by the Simon Wiesenthal Centre* to do it?
* established in 1977 as "an international Jewish human rights organization" dedicated to confronting antisemitism, hate and terrorism, promoting human rights and dignity, standing with Israel, defending the safety of Jews worldwide, and teaching the lessons of the Holocaust for future generations.
We just wish to point out to the court that is not a signed sworn statement of Dr. Bender but merely a translation of an alleged or purported statement of Dr. Bender, the original of which, like many other things, is not to be found today.
- Defence counsel, Dachau trial, 7 August 1947

Turnagain
Posts: 8035
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by Turnagain »

The term "hoaxer" was first used c.1796 so your claim that "hoaxster" is somehow "better" is pure bullshit opinion. Just as your empty claim of "tosh" is just an excuse for your empty bullshit. You have no answers and are attempting to assume the lordly pose of, "it's all beneath my dignity." The truth is when you're not completely empty, you're full of more shit than a Christmas goose. You claim to be the great researcher but can't even define the location of the giant mass graves at Treblinka. Nobody can because those graves don't exist. You, Nessie, et al. frantically try to weasel dodge that inescapable fact just as you attempt to gloss over the magic Jew barbeque. You lose, BRoI. Loser.

Aryan Scholar
Posts: 4652
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by Aryan Scholar »

theblackrabbitofinlé wrote:
Aryan Scholar wrote:
theblackrabbitofinlé wrote:
Aryan Scholar wrote:Let me guess: you are implying "disinfected" is an euphemism for killed?
The same report mentions that the Reich will have saved an estimated 885,439,980 RM over a period of ten years, and 13,492,440 kilograms of meat by having "disinfected" these 70,273 disabled people.

If they were literally given a disinfection, how would that save the Reich so much money and meat?
By not letting those people have children.
You're implying claiming "disinfected" is a euphemism for "sterilised"!

What's your suggestion for what the author really meant by the word "Todestages"?

Menstrual cycle?
Due date?
Sexy time?
Unter Zugrundelegung des berechneten durchschnittlichen Tageskostenpreises bis zum 1. September 1941 erstandenen wirklichen Ersparnisse zu errechnen. Diese betragen — unter Nichtbeachtung des von uns bestimmten Todestages — Diese Ersparnisse setzen sich wie folgt monatlich zusammen:

Image
https://www.fold3.com/image/231944366
You jump from page 1 to page 29 of a book.

What is between page 1 and page 29?

User avatar
theblackrabbitofinlé
Posts: 2094
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Challenge to "Hannover"

Post by theblackrabbitofinlé »

Aryan Scholar wrote:You jump from page 1 to page 29 of a book.

What is between page 1 and page 29?
Spoon-feeding request filled:

Mostly calculations about how much marmalade and coffee-substitute the Reich would save now they'd killed these 70,273 people. You can, of course, read the entire 39 page report on the link, but seeing as that appears to be too much for you, here's the contents listing:

Image

So, once again—I would hate to think you're weasel dodging—what was meant by the word "Todestages" on page 29?
We just wish to point out to the court that is not a signed sworn statement of Dr. Bender but merely a translation of an alleged or purported statement of Dr. Bender, the original of which, like many other things, is not to be found today.
- Defence counsel, Dachau trial, 7 August 1947

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests