This topic-thread is not about people in denial creating multiple, anonymous sock-puppets.
Its about the increase of people seeing through the lies and deceits of WW2 in general, and about the increase in people publically acknowleding they now understand the out-of-context, special-and-unique-suffering lie that has been forced on the world concerning the Jewish experience during that Jewish created war, in paricular.
Here is the case of a German politician who has come out of the big lie of our times. He not only saw through the lies that Germans have been indoctrinated with for seven decades, but he dared to speak about the political weaponisation of this 'holocaust' pseudo-history.
’ argument that his statements were protected by Article 10, which protects freedom of expression, was “manifestly ill-founded,” given that he “had intentionally stated untruths in order to defame the Jews and the persecution that they had suffered”
the Strasbourg, France-based court ruled on Thursday. His complaint that he was denied a fair trial in Germany was also rejected by the ECHR.
Pastörs had given a speech a day after Holocaust Remembrance Day in 2010, saying that the “the so-called Holocaust is being used for political and commercial purposes” and also referring to a “barrage of criticism and propagandistic lies” and “Auschwitz projections.” He was first convicted in 2012 by a German district court, and then a regional court rejected his appeal of the verdict less than a year later.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... court-says
In 2010 Udo Pastörs
was a 56 year old member of the Land Parliament of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in Germany when he had enough of the bullshit. He has been in court ever since, defending his right of freedom of expression. All because as a political representative of the German people speaking in that Parliament, he said the following in a ceremony on Holocaust Memorial Day
“...people can sense that the so-called Holocaust is being used for political and commercial purposes… Since the end of the Second World War, Germans have been exposed to an endless barrage of criticism and propagandistic lies — cultivated in a dishonest manner primarily by representatives of the so-called democratic parties, ladies and gentlemen. Also, the event that you organised here in the castle yesterday was nothing more than you imposing your Auschwitz projections onto the German people in a manner that is both cunning and brutal. You are hoping, ladies and gentlemen, for the triumph of lies over truth.”
The Parliament revoked his parliamentary immunity and he was prosecuted. Why? Because speaking such genuinely held opinions is a thought crime in Germany. Because publishing or saying publically the true facts about WW2 and the deceitful weaponising of the Aliied propaganda concerning concentration camps is regarded as 'Holocaust denial' and is a crime in Germany.
He appealed his case through several courts in Germany and eventually the case came before the ECHR
(European Court of Human Rights) on the grounds that the prosecution breached his freedom of expression.
Article 10 of the Convention states that
“Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society…for the protection of the reputation or rights of others…”
The ECHR reached the ludicrous conclusion that Mr Pastörs had “intentionally stated untruths in order to defame the Jews and the persecution that they had suffered during the Second World War”
That is a clear lie by the court, as no-one can know with certainty the inner thoughts of another, so could NOT conclude he knew what he was saying was "untrue".
On the contrary, the most obvious, common-sense conclusion is that Udo was courageously doing the EXACT OPPOSITE, and speaking what he considered to be a taboo 'truth'. This is the state that the Holyhoax has brought society to: that high courts of Europe and Germany need to lie themselves in order to convict people for thinking thoughts that are suppressed and forbidden.
This ECHR kangaroo court also stated that it considered that his “impugned statements affected the dignity of the Jews to the point that they justified a criminal-law response.”
This is what this is really about, not protecting historical truth. Historical truth needs no protection from courts, as it is something that is in constant re-evaluation, analysis, investigation and revision. Only a false history forbids revision and seeks laws to protect it.
The court case was brought by a 'Jewish' organisation calling itself Campaign Against Antisemitism
They are attempting to protect the 'holocaust' pseudo-history from open, honest analysis. It was them who also sought to suppress historical truth in their legal action against Alison Chabloz over her songs.
That was a landmark case as now it can be used as a legal precedence for asserting that anything involving historical revision and critical analysis of 'Holocaust' shall be regarded by English courts as “grossly offensive” to 'Jews' and therefore illegal.
Udo Pastörs who could somehow "affect the dignity" of a large group of society merely by speaking his mind in parliament