Does the Quran Allow Marriage to Children? (SPOILER ALERT: YES!)

[Huntinger]

crazy and dishonest person.

Only one adjective needed.

[been-there]

crazy and dishonest person.

Only one adjective needed.

So, what to do?

[Turnagain]

Just curious, b-t, but why are you so hot about defending ragheads? Speaking generally, not about individual Muslims, anywhere that religion goes trouble will follow. Big time, just like Mary's little lamb. Pissing and moaning about "insulting Allah, Mohammad, the Koran or whatever and of course rapes and sexual assaults on "infidel" women, murders for perceived slights and so on. Why the hell are you OK with having these assholes around civilized western countries?

[Werd]

Observe.

SHORT VERSION:
My question to him was specifically about child MARRIAGE being permitted and practiced in Judaism:

So only marriage was on the table? Let's just see.

Q. When have you railed against Jewish law and sex/marriage being religously permitted with girls as young as 12 years old, Werd?
A. Never!

So yeah, been-there DID put sex with children on the table when talking about Judaism. Now he is claiming he never did and I was wrong for suggesting he did. How dare I read English properly.

But wait. It gets even funnier!

I had challenged his clear Islamaphobia by asking him why he never rails constantly about Jewish law and sex/marriage being religously permitted with kids.

The only way he can extricate himself from this embarrassing faux pax, is to fallaciously move the goal posts and say, "No Werd I wasn't talking about Jewish pedophiles on the street per say. Good for you for exposing that before. I was specifically talking about JEWISH TALMUDIC LAW. WHY HAVEN'T YOU SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE TALMUD AND CHILD SEX?"

Well I have in fact talked about that. I have in fact covered the bases been-there accused me of not covering. It's on the previous page in this very goddamn topic. Okay. I'll copy and paste the whole thing since been-there sees fit to once it ONCE AGAIN.

If you railed equally as vociferously against Jewish and Christian customs it would be sign of a fair and ethically consistent attitude.

Been-there doesn't know how to use a search engine. Here's an old topic about me talking about a rabbinic tradition with talmudic sanction about sucking the penis of little boys whose penis have just met the knife in a circumcision.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2040

In this post, I talked about the Jewish blood rituals and occult magic rites in the Talmud and Kabbala. One of the links is about RABBINIC PEDOPHILIA.
viewtopic.php?p=101710#p101710

Been-there also forgets that a topic HE LIKED because it contained an exposure of the Zionist Scofield Bible that was unknown to him, I quoted a long interview with Ted Pike and Daryl Bradford Smith. Here is one clip of that interview:

Daryl:
Now let's give our listeners an idea of some of the evils were talking about. I recently was talking about codifying homosexuality for example. It's not homosexuality if you have sex with a child under nine for example, or with a young girl over three years and one day, because her virginity can heal. And then they start talking about how beastility can be explained away in some instances in the Talmud. The fact is, there is no dispensation for these kinds of illnesses.


Ted:
In the talmud, the rabbis are the makers of halaka, or jewish law. We find rabbis like Simon Ben Yohai. Some rabbis who were on the scene of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, now these earliest rabbis were all pedophiles, all child abusers. Again and again to the most authoritative treatises of the Talud, they say a girl of three years and a day is ready for sex and is made ready for marriage by coition, or the act of sex with her. Rape. In my book ISRAEL: OUR DUTY, OUR DILEMMA, I have documenation of that with Xerox photocopies in my book. Rabbis have endorsed this as a privilege. These ancient rabbis say that a boy since he is not mature at nine, a rabbi can have sex with him without moral ramifications. It's neutral. What I'm saying is, at the very foundation of talmudic judaism, we have hypocrites. For that reason, it is not a mystery why it was found that ninety percent of these Jewish media executives, people found astonishing results that many of these Jewish media moguls favour homosexuality, adultery and pornography.

So there is me again exposing Talmudic pedophilia to a wider audience.

Here's me calling out the NAMBLA Jews.
viewtopic.php?p=64835#p64835

So been-there can eat his words when he accuses me of not mentioning Jewish/Talmudic pedophilia. He needs to blame himself for his poor memory.

Is been-there done embarrassing himself? Will he only quote the first half of my post to try and make it seem like I wasn't aware that he was specifically calling out the Talmud as opposed to the Jewish pedophile on the street and then further embarrass himself? Will he quote mine and double down on stupid instead of simply acknowledging his error and apologizing? Who knows.

I bet Nessie and been-there think beheading, gay bashing, and female circumcision is worth the sacrifice for multiculturalism in Europe.

[Werd]

Just curious, b-t, but why are you so hot about defending ragheads?

Because Jews are lying about Muslims and Islam to stir up hatred against a vulnerable minority while Jews keep running off to the bank with all the money and controlling the media to cover up that fact, but also to get people to like them and turn a blind eye to other crimes like ethnic cleansing in palestine, drug and human trafficking in Israel, etc, etc, etc. It hasn't occurred to been-there that someone can be against Islam and Muslim immigration AND STILL AGREE WITH HIM ON THE FACTUAL NATURE OF EVERY OTHER SCAM THAT THE ZIONISTS/JEWS HAVE BEEN DOING FROM THE MEDIA, BANKS, HOLOCAUST, 9-11, PALESTINE, RITUAL MURDER, ETC, ETC. Even though I've already fully explained why his conspiracy theory violates Occam's Razor.

if anyone wants to resist this deliberate campaign to create multicultural societys in Europe — with all the negative fallout that entails and some of which Werd is detailing — then I suggest you yourself learn and then make other people aware of WHO is behind the campaign

Been-there lies and keeps pretending I can't see the Jews peaching for open borders and the Zionist NGO's shipping them over. He knows I do. I have put him on notice multiple times.
viewtopic.php?p=160314#p160314

You are still showing you are an unwitting pawn of a Jewish-led and orchestrated mass-immigration policy to destroy European culture and replace it with irreversible multi-cultural nations.

Been-there can't stop embarrassing himself. I'm opposed to the orchestrated mass-immigration policy. I have been clear on that many times. Since been-there knows this, the obvious implication is this: Been-there just pretends that opposition to Islam equals philo-semitism He also keeps pretending I can't see the Jews behind the open gates policy when I clearly can. In fact THAT'S WHAT THIS WHOLE DEBATE WITH NESSIE WAS ABOUT OVER HERE. One rabbi Efrati wants mass immigration to Europe but NOT ISRAEL.
viewtopic.php?p=137940#p137940
Been-there also plays dumb on me fingering the Jewish role in mass immigration despite being notified multiple times. He must know by now I have in fact done so. What's his excuse for his ignorance on these topics I have started?

A Jew confesses Jewry's "pro immigration" sins
More lefty Jews pushing hatred of white middle class
MUSLIM IMMIGRATION IS A FORCED CONSPIRACY
Loony lefties have no logic regarding immigration
More Jews cheerleading for mass immigration to white nations

[...]

So therefore it's up to him to explain why he continues to lie.

, why they are doing it

My conspiracy theory doesn't violate Occam's Razor, whereas his does. We've been over this.
viewtopic.php?p=139996#p139996

From what I have seen so far Been-there thinks Jews are lying about Islam, the Koran, the Hadiths, and also crime rates of Muslims. He seems to think Islam and Muslims are benign and are no more a problem than naturally born Europeans in Europe. Okay, so if Jews are orchestrating Muslim immigration THEN WHERE IS THE PROBLEM? According to been-there, if Muslims aren't causing problems at a disproportionate rate and are well behaved people THEN THERE SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM. But according to him, THERE IS A PROBLEM and I am apparently an "unwitting shill for the Jewish organised destruction of Europe." So if there is a problem of some kind, it's not that Muslims are here per say. It must be because they are here AND Jews are lying about their religion and/or their actual crimes committed and the related crime rates. In other words, been-there thinks this is TWO PRONGED conspiracy of the Jews. I see it as a SINGLE PRONGED CONSPIRACY.

My conspiracy theory makes more sense than his.He thinks the Jews would waste extra time AFTER bringing in a culture that allegedly has nothing harmful and has had no bad results apparently in "integration" in the west, to then subsequently spend so much time and money LYING about how bad Islam is. My conspiracy theory is supported by Occam's razor and is more logical. Jews deliberately PICKED a hostile anti western culture and THRUST it into the neighbourhoods of gentiles. The work would do itself and the gentiles would see the results.
[...]
The Jews would not waste their time injecting a culture and then lying about how bad it is. Being historically notorious parasites, they would do as little work as possible to get the job done. Hence, they picked a nasty culture they wouldn't need to waste time and money lying about.

Keep beating that dead horse, Nessiebeen-there.

[Turnagain]

Werd, it isn't any conspiracy theory that the kikes are behind multiculturalism and flooding Europe and the US with every kind of shitskin they can find. That Emanuel Celler and Jacob Javits, the two New York kikes that promoted and got the immigration reform act 1965 passed into law and that bitch, Barbara Specter in Europe makes that plain enough. Kikes hate White men and have been doing everything in their considerable power through banking, media and politics to destroy White western civilization. In case you haven't noticed, there's a huge anti-White campaign being waged in the US as we speak.

That wasn't my question. I am wondering why b-t is sticking up for the asshole Muslims. Making excuses for their head pedophile, Mohammad and so on. What does he find redeeming about a bunch of inbred trouble making assholes?

[been-there]

Just curious, b-t, but why are you so hot about defending ragheads [people from the Middle East]?
...Why the hell are you OK with having these assholes [people] around civilized western countries?

Ah, but I am NOT “ok” with the clandestine and hypocritical campaign initiated and promoted predominantly by Jews who admit they want to create multi-cultural societies in European countries and yet want a racially pure, Jews-only state in stolen territory they are ethnically-cleansing in the Middle East.

I object to both a.) their hypocrisy and b.) their deceitful campaign to make everyone distrust and hate Islam and muslims so that Israelis can pose as victims surrounded by savages, while simultaneously mass-murdering and brutalising muslims in occupied Palestine with impunity.

If there was no Israel, I doubt there would be so many western-backed wars and insurrections in muslim countries. All the problems in Iraq, in Libya, in Syria, in Iran, etc., were and are because of Israel, and are implented to protect Israeli interests. Oil is only a secondary incentive and pay-off to non-Jews in western, Jewish-controlled governments. And oil is something which I believe could be sorted without all the blood-shed and western-backed Israel-implemented destabilisation.

If there weren’t all those Israel-protecting, western-supported insurrections and attempts at regime-change, there wouldn’t be so many Muslims fleeing to Europe and America.

And I am not making “excuses”. I am dealing with deducible, referencable, verifiable, historical fact!
Isn’t that to be expected on a discussion forum trying to correct lies and distortions of recent history?
E.g. Muhammed was not a paedophile. I just proved that here on RODOH using historical sources.
That is a Christian-spread deception. One used to preach the superiority of their own belief-system.
One that more recently Jewish groups have been spreading as part of their anti-muslim campaign to deflect from what they are doing in the Middle East.

[been-there]

.
Dear oh dear!
Look at Werd’s answer.

He refuses to except simple facts and irrefutable evidence showing he is in error.

I regard his reply as literally insane behaviour as I DID ask him why he doesn’t rail against Judaic and Jewish permitting of child marriage/marital sex.

And anyone and everyone can see he DOES rant on about that in Islamic societies.
But he has NEVER done that about Jewish child marriages and thus the permitted marital sex with kids when it is in Jewish societies.

Everything I wrote referenced child marriage and thus marital sex specifically with female child brides. Not paedophilia!
Yet again he rants on about paedophilia unrelated to child marriage.

The man is clearly mentally unstable.

Observe.

SHORT VERSION:
My question to him was specifically about child MARRIAGE being permitted and practiced in Judaism:

So only marriage was on the table? Let's just see.

Q. When have you railed against Jewish law and sex/marriage being religously permitted with girls as young as 12 years old, Werd?
A. Never!

So yeah, been-there DID put sex with children on the table when talking about Judaism. Now he is claiming he never did and I was wrong for suggesting he did. How dare I read English properly.

But wait. It gets even funnier!

I had challenged his clear Islamaphobia by asking him why he never rails constantly about Jewish law and sex/marriage being religously permitted with kids.

The only way he can extricate himself from this embarrassing faux pax, is to fallaciously move the goal posts and say, "No Werd I wasn't talking about Jewish pedophiles on the street per say. Good for you for exposing that before. I was specifically talking about JEWISH TALMUDIC LAW. WHY HAVEN'T YOU SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE TALMUD AND CHILD SEX?"

Well I have in fact talked about that. I have in fact covered the bases been-there accused me of not covering. It's on the previous page in this very goddamn topic. Okay. I'll copy and paste the whole thing since been-there sees fit to once it ONCE AGAIN.

If you railed equally as vociferously against Jewish and Christian customs it would be sign of a fair and ethically consistent attitude.

Been-there doesn't know how to use a search engine. Here's an old topic about me talking about a rabbinic tradition with talmudic sanction about sucking the penis of little boys whose penis have just met the knife in a circumcision.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2040

In this post, I talked about the Jewish blood rituals and occult magic rites in the Talmud and Kabbala. One of the links is about RABBINIC PEDOPHILIA.
viewtopic.php?p=101710#p101710

Been-there also forgets that a topic HE LIKED because it contained an exposure of the Zionist Scofield Bible that was unknown to him, I quoted a long interview with Ted Pike and Daryl Bradford Smith. Here is one clip of that interview:

Daryl:
Now let's give our listeners an idea of some of the evils were talking about. I recently was talking about codifying homosexuality for example. It's not homosexuality if you have sex with a child under nine for example, or with a young girl over three years and one day, because her virginity can heal. And then they start talking about how beastility can be explained away in some instances in the Talmud. The fact is, there is no dispensation for these kinds of illnesses.


Ted:
In the talmud, the rabbis are the makers of halaka, or jewish law. We find rabbis like Simon Ben Yohai. Some rabbis who were on the scene of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, now these earliest rabbis were all pedophiles, all child abusers. Again and again to the most authoritative treatises of the Talud, they say a girl of three years and a day is ready for sex and is made ready for marriage by coition, or the act of sex with her. Rape. In my book ISRAEL: OUR DUTY, OUR DILEMMA, I have documenation of that with Xerox photocopies in my book. Rabbis have endorsed this as a privilege. These ancient rabbis say that a boy since he is not mature at nine, a rabbi can have sex with him without moral ramifications. It's neutral. What I'm saying is, at the very foundation of talmudic judaism, we have hypocrites. For that reason, it is not a mystery why it was found that ninety percent of these Jewish media executives, people found astonishing results that many of these Jewish media moguls favour homosexuality, adultery and pornography.

So there is me again exposing Talmudic pedophilia to a wider audience.

Here's me calling out the NAMBLA Jews.
viewtopic.php?p=64835#p64835

So been-there can eat his words when he accuses me of not mentioning Jewish/Talmudic pedophilia. He needs to blame himself for his poor memory.

Is been-there done embarrassing himself? Will he only quote the first half of my post to try and make it seem like I wasn't aware that he was specifically calling out the Talmud as opposed to the Jewish pedophile on the street and then further embarrass himself? Will he quote mine and double down on stupid instead of simply acknowledging his error and apologizing? Who knows.

I bet Nessie and been-there think beheading, gay bashing, and female circumcision is worth the sacrifice for multiculturalism in Europe.

[Turnagain]

So why are you defending these "fleeing" assholes? Let them "flee" in some other direction.

[Werd]

I DID ask him why he doesn’t rail against Judaic and Jewish permitting of child marriage/marital sex.

You also got mad at me for insinuating that you said you brought up sex in the first place.

My question to him was specifically about child MARRIAGE being permitted and practiced in Judaism:

Nothing in there about sex. Just marriage.

This is what's called a contradiction, been-there. Time to own your shit.