Think of Christianity itself, "take and drink, for this is my..."
The sacrifice of Jesus as the ultimate in "kosher kills."
God's only begotten son, born to suffer a slow and torturous death upon a....T. It's all very suspicious.
Think of Christianity itself, "take and drink, for this is my..."
The work can be accessed at the London National archives ONLY by requesting and receiving written permission.BURTON, Sir Richard Francis (1821-1890).
Autograph manuscript treatise entitled 'Human Sacrifice among the Sephardine or Eastern Jews'.
The unpublished chapters describe (in chapters I - IV) the events surrounding the disappearance of Padre Tomaso, a Capuchin friar, and his Syrian Christian servant, in Damascus in 1840, when thirteen members of the Jewish community were arrested and accused of having committed ritual murder.
In chapters V and VI Burton gives his views on the continuity of 'the tradition of human sacrifice', with a historical aperçu of accusations made in Syria, Lebanon and parts of Europe.
Appendix I ('Jews in Roumania') gives a version of the arrival of the Jews in Moldavia and Wallachia, and their situation at the time of Burton's writing.
Appendix II is largely a dismissive commentary on Dr Alexander McCaul's pamphlet (published in 1840) which by examining Rabbinical writings refutes the ritual murder accusation.
The manuscript is Burton's final and complete autograph copy.
...in 1881-1882 allegations of blood libel were raised again in the clerical publication Civiltà Cattolica in Rome. Towards the end of the century they were revived in parts of Eastern Europe including Roumania, and particularly in Russia where they were instrumental in provoking massacres.
By reviving interest in the events of 1840, Burton sought to reopen an issue which informed public opinion had already largely rejected as untrue. The introduction includes his justification for the work:
'The statements contained in these pages must, if untrue to fact, be speedily buried in the limbo of vagaries and dreams. If true, they open up an unknown chapter of Modern History which deserves careful perusal'.
He repudiates the judicial investigation of Padre Tomaso's case ('the preposterous preference of fiction to fact'), and the 'peculiar action of the British authorities', preferring to believe the statements of 'native Christians quite as well informed in their own way as, and far more acute than, the average higher orders of our own countrymen'.
Chapters I and II comprise an extensive, detailed and often obsessive account, based on contemporary narratives and unspecified documentary sources, of the life and death of 'the Martyr Padre Tomaso' and the consequent events. Chapter III discusses the procès verbal of the alleged murderers with frequent interpolations by Burton disputing the statements of the defendants and their witnesses, and Chapter IV includes the 'Confessions' or testimony of the 'Doctor (Hakham) Moshe Abu'l Afiya' [the principal Jewish witness].
These chapters also incorporate Burton's views of the varying responses of the different European consuls to the investigation, from which only the Frenchman, Count Ratti-Menton [a known anti-semite] 'who had to fight the battle single-handed', emerges with credit.
Check that out!! A highly placed British Jew in 2001 described Burton's research as a betrayal of "world Jewry".News of the auction has outraged many prominent British Jews because the work has been put up for sale by the organisation at the centre of Judaism in the UK, the British Board of Deputies.
The manuscript's contents, including the central claim that Jews once performed ritual human sacrifices, are considered so offensive that a campaign has been launched this weekend to stop the sale. Those involved fear the work will fall into the hands of American fascist groups who have expressed interest in owning it.
Yesterday the influential Orthodox rabbi Irving Jacobs called on his north London congregation to consider pooling funds to buy the work to keep it from neo-Nazis.
'The sale is a real blunder,' he told The Observer. 'I was horrified to hear of this and, although I don't want to impede genuine scholarship, I believe something like this should not be in the public domain.
Christie's has given the book a reserve price of £200,000 and describes it anodynely as 'one of a few substantial autograph manuscripts by Sir Richard Burton remaining in private hands'.
'I am appalled and gobsmacked by what the board are doing,' said Geoffrey Alderman, an academic who has seen the original document. 'Nearly 100 years ago, the board went to a lot of trouble to get this work to suppress it. The decision to sell it now amounts to a betrayal of world Jewry.'
Neville Nagler, director-general of the board, claims that the manuscript is now no more than a 'historical document' of interest only to scholars of Burton.
'We always anticipated this move would be criticised,' Nagler told The Observer. 'It is true we cannot afford the rent on our central London premises and that the sale may help us with a deposit on our first property, but this is not driven by our finances.
He added: 'Only a handful of people have seen it, but most agree it is an important document for those interested in Burton.'
Nagler confirmed the work was bought up in 1909 to prevent its publication, but he argues that its value as a negative tool for anti-Semites has lessened over the years.
Alderman, however, remembers the manuscript as potent and bigoted. 'It was terrible to see these things written in English, especially by an intelligent man such as Burton,' he said.
'When I first tried to read it for research, an enormous number of obstacles were put in my way by the board. I was subject to a great deal of abuse and was told details of its contents must never be released.
Burton's 1877 work gives a lurid account of the arrest and acquittal of thrteen Jews accused of the ritual murder of a Capuchin friar in 1840, an event that became known as the Damascus Blood Libel.
At the risk of going off topic, the diary may explain how Dr Mengele was the only doctor on duty 24/7 working at several location simultaneously; this is quite a feat; being at Dachau and Birkenau simultaneously is quite awesome. I wonder if his wrist had arthritis with all the flicking of the whip to the left and right. I wonder what Jesus would think.Turnagain wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 10:56 amSounds like a previous version of what happened to Mengele's diary. The Jews buy it at auction and then sequester it away so that nobody can read it. It could be supposed that the Jews would want the whole world to see a first hand account of all of the atrocities committed by Dr. Mengele but that hasn't happened. Instead it's been secreted away in an unknown location. Gee, do ya' think that the diary doesn't describe his eyeball or evil twins experiments?
See more here: http://holywar.org/txt/RitualMurder/jrm-10.htmlThe Grand Rabbi [of Damascus] was brought before the Court of Investigation; his name was Yakub al Entebbe. He was required to listen carefully to the examination and to the answers of the [confessing converted] Jew Mousa Abou-al-Afieh, and to confirm or deny each statement made by Mousa. In this way, the Rabbi admitted that blood was required for the ceremonial bread. He also confessed to having received Father Thomas's blood.
[Grand Rabbi Yakub Al-Entebbe came before the Ottoman court to listen to the testimony of the new Muslim convert, and ostensibly, to refute it. But newspapers reported that the Grand Rabbi confirmed that some Jews practiced blood rites, and that he had even received blood for this purpose.]
According to the Turkish custom, the bastinado [caning the soles of the feet] was freely applied to make the Jews speak. The Jewish Money Power has endeavoured to make the world believe that it was only the torture which enforced confession from innocent men.
Unfortunately for the Jewish Money Power, one of the questions asked was about the place where the remains of Father Thomas had been disposed of; and the remains were found where the prisoners said they were — that is, in a covered conduit. These remains were identified by European doctors as being those of Father Thomas.
Further, the wretches confessed to serving Father Thomas's servant in the same way, i.e., cutting his throat, collecting his blood, and disposing of the remains, this time in a latrine.
No amount of bastinado or torture could wring from an innocent man information as to the whereabouts of the remains of the victim of a murder.
We spare the reader the sickening details of the crime according to the confessions and admissions of the... Jewish murderers; long extracts from the trial's proceedings can be obtained in the following French book: Le Crime Ritual chez les Juifs, by A. Monniot, prefaced by the celebrated Edouard Drumont from Paris in 1914. This book shows that the confessions made by the culprits agreed in every detail, and that the questions they had to answer were not "leading questions".
Fourteen Jews were found guilty, and ten were condemned to death, two having died [apparently under torture, which implies MORE than bastinado was employed].
Our business is not to horrify; it is to expose the methods of Jewish intrigue and corruption which were used to conceal the guilt of the culprits in fear of the natural reaction of the Gentile to the facts if they became generally known.
As soon as the first reports of the case reached the West of Europe the Jewish Money Power rose like one man to try and cover the obvious tracks made by the obvious criminals. Money can, as we know only too well, accomplish wonders on a democracy as also on the Endings and policy of Eastern (and alas! often also Western) potentates.
It will perhaps be best to deal with each of these matters separately:
1. The Press agitation
This was on the usual Jewish lines:
Ritual Murder was "a Gentile invention";
Comte Ratti-Menton, the French Consul, who had insisted on the investigation, was attacked from every angle;
the Jews were being persecuted, and so on and so forth.
2. Agitation by public meetings.
For example, in London, the gullible democracy was induced to flock to a big meeting at the Mansion House in London, there to denounce the Blood Accusation of which they knew nothing at all, and to offer the Jews the sympathy of the British Nation! Paris, New York, Philadelphia and other towns followed suit!
3. Bribery of the Khedive of Egypt by money.
The rich Jews, Moses Montefiore in England, Cremieux and Munck in France, went off hotfoot to the East. They applied to the Khedive of Egypt, whose regime included Damascus, for a revision of the sentence. He was offered and accepted a huge sum of money and released the condemned Jews.
Note the result. The Jews proclaimed everywhere that the Khedive had reversed the verdict! He had done nothing of the kind. There was no reversal and no re-trial. The words of the Khedive's firman which he issued to release the Jewish murderers give the whole thing away:
He released the Jews therefore because of the numbers of Jews in the population ...and undoubtedly for cash received. He knew their guilt, and never denied it. Yet the Jewish Encyclopaedia (1903, Vol. IV, p. 420) actually ventures to assert that the three rich Jews secured from the 'Khedive a "recognition of the innocence" of the condemned men. The Khedive's price for releasing them is stated to have been half a million piastres. A converted Rabbi, Chevalier P. L. B. Drach, wrote in his The Harmony between the Church and the Synagogue (1844, Paris, p. 79): "Money played a great role in this business."From the account and demand of Messrs. Moses Montefiore and Cremieux, who came to us as delegates of all Europeans professing the religion of Moses, we have recognised that they desire the liberation and safety for the Jews who have been detained or who have taken flight in the case of the examination of the affair of Father Thomas, monk, missing in Damascus; he and his servant, Ibrahim.
And as, because of their numerous population, it would not be convenient (convenable) to refuse their demand and request, we order that the Jew prisoners shall be released and that the fugitives be given safety for their return. And you will take all possible measures that none are badly treated and that they are left undisturbed everywhere.
Such is our will.
4. Bribery of the Sultan.
Having won the first round with the Khedive, the Jew Montefiore went on to see the Sultan of Turkey, and secured from him a decree that the Blood Accusation was baseless and that the Jews henceforth were to be on the same footing in the Sultan's dominions as other non-Muslims. The price of this was a huge bribe from the House of Rothschild.
The Sultan Abd-ul-Mejid's firman said "that a thorough examination of the religious books of the Hebrews has demonstrated the absolute prohibition of the use of either human or animal blood in any of their religious rites. It follows from this defence that the charges against them and their religion are calumnies." This, as shown in Chapter III, is mere sophistry, but even in 1936 a Miss C. WI. Finn had the effrontery to bring forward the firman as "evidence" that the Blood Accusation is false; this was in a letter to the Jewish Chronicle, 2nd October, 1936.
The wording of the firman is quoted in the Jewish Encyclopaedia, Vol. I, p. 47 (1906).
On his way home, Montefiore tried to get an audience with the Pope, Gregory XVI, but was refused an audience.
5. Attempted bribery of the French Consul.
Comte Ratti-Menton, the French Consul who had shown such determination in having the ritual murderers dealt with, and who was a most upright man, wrote to the Sherif Pasha on 22nd April to say that the Jews had, through the Austrian Consulate, offered him half a million piastres to have the evidence suppressed. Needless to say, when this honourable man was found incorruptible, the advocates of the Jews got busy as stated above to besmirch his reputation. Thiers, the French Foreign Secretary, replying to Jew-inspired attacks on the French Consul Ratti-Menton, stated in the Chamber of Deputies, 3rd June, 1840, "Let it be known to you, gentlemen, I repeat it, that in all the Chancellories the Israelites are in insistence for that affair and our Consul can lean only on the Minister of Foreign Affairs for France. A French agent who is in his right will always be protected against all influences, whatever they may be." M. Thiers also said that the Comte's superior officer, WI. Cochelet, Consul for Egypt, approved of his subordinate's action and that the English Consul was of the same mind.
6. Bribery of Austrian diplomats.
Throughout the proceedings, the Austrian Consul supported the Jews against the charge of ritual murder. Here, from a Jewish source, is the reason, duly confessed: From The History of the Jews in Vienna, by the Jew, Max Grunwald, 1936 (Philadelphia), pp. 228-9:
There you have it; Rothschild's money power; the Austrian Chancellor, Metternich; the Austrian Consul at Damascus; the Consul's attitude towards the Ritual Murder charge. A continuous chain of Jewish corruption by Money."Following the policy of the House [of Rothschild] in other countries, where it obtained privileges for the Jews in return for loans --in Rome, the abolition of the Ghetto, and in England, Jewish emancipation — Solomon [Rothschild] obtained from Metternich concessions to the Jews in legislation. It was he who influenced the Chancellor to take a favourable stand in the Damascus blood-accusation case of 1840."
7. Suppression of the reports of the Trial.
We have already mentioned in the second paragraph of this description of the case the record of the trial published in Achille Laurent's book. This book cannot now be obtained anywhere. Gougenot des Mousseaux, however, had printed a very full account of the trial (taken from Laurent) in his work Le Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, a work which earned for him the praise of Pope Pius IX who made him a Chevalier; and the writer has had a copy of this lent to him. But Gougenot des Mousseaux's book is now very rare, and the Chevalier himself died suddenly in mysterious circumstances nine hours after receiving a warning letter. Monniot, in a work; mentioned in the Bibliography (p. 56), has, however, made it easy for anyone who desires to read the details of the trial to do so.
But, the reader may ask, what about the official dossier of the affair? This naturally reposed in the archives of the French Foreign Office. But Desportes in his Mystere du Sang reported that under the Ministry of Cremieux (one of the Jews who went East to bribe the Khedive to release the ritual murderers of Damascus) it disappeared (in 1870)! As this report aroused comment, the Chancellerie made a declaration (5th May, 1892) that it was incorrect and that the dossier remained complete at the Ministry. However that may be, when Albert Monniot in 1913 desired to consult the documents themselves to assist him in writing his Le Crime Rituel chez les Juifs, he found that he was refused permission to peruse them. Whether they are still extant or not, therefore, we cannot tell; all we know is that the secrets of the Jew are well guarded. But not well enough, as I hope the reader will by now agree.
Sir Richard Burton. the great explorer and orientalist who was English Consul at Damascus 30 years after the Ritual Murder, studied the whole question of the Blood Accusation, and: eventually wrote The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, of which I have the edition edited by NS. H. Wilkins and published by Hutchinson in 1898. This work contains a damning indictment of the Talmud, and a list of Jewish Ritual Murders, but Wilkins in his Preface (p. x) writes: "In the exercise of the discretion given to me, I have thought it better to hold over for the present the Appendix on the alleged rite of Human Sacrifice among the Sephardim and the murder of Padre Tomaso (Father Thomas); the only alternative was to publish it in a mutilated form."
All those gentiles said a Jew was innocent. The ritual murder BS is irrelevant.
How limited in thinking...Speech kills people.
It certainly can, yes.
Literally, no it doesn't. You're thinking of automatic weapons.
No, right about this one. Frankly that’s just weird, Werd. Even for you. I don’t think many of your fellow RODOH dwellers are with you on this one.Well, at least I know Hitler wasn’t a British agent.
Don’t know Greg Hallett but I follow Henry Makow on Twitter. He’s not someone I would go to for facts on well...anything.Consult Greg Hallett and Henry Makow (Jew).
And you do?I’m certainly not going to say at no time did a Jew commit a murder, much less never murder a child. But as part of a ritual relating to a sect of Judaism? Not hardly
Then you don't know the Talmud, the Kabbalah, and any other esoteric strain of Judaism.
Well, I have seen all the Harry Potter movies and read all the books. Does that count for anything?You certainly don't know about the occult, magical rites, and the special place of blood in magic and why evil magic requires shedding the blood of the innocent.
I’m sure.As I said, this is something that permeates all western religions in a very hidden section of each one.
Like wound patterns and things like that?Werd, it’s such an odd thing to discuss, this idea that Jewish people murder children as part of their religion.
Again, you refuse to deal in specifics. The phrase "Jews" can mean any Jew. But the fact is that even open anti semites like Arnold Leese have claimed that ONLY A SELECT OCCULT, BLACK MAGIC SECT WITHIN HASIDISM is guilty of this. Now did this FACT get overlooked by some people and probably result in some false accusations against Jews? OF COURSE! NOBODY IS DENYING THIS! What I am saying is that there is specific evidence of Hasidic Jews and Hasidic Jews ALONE being guilty of blood rites.
Yeah...those books don’t really help your case....Here’s Werd’s deal: He believes in really weird things because something in his brain broke.
And here goes Jeff once again slagging off the many competent and excellent Jewish authors I have read that appear in this list of books from my personal library
I’m not a Communist, Werd. Communism is simply silly and juvenile. Frankly it’s outdated and truth be told I found the writings of Marx dull. When it’s put into practice (or it’s theories) it turns authoritarian and is lethal to the populace.I could just as well say that conspiracy theory haters like you who slag off conspiracy theories that EXONERATE Jews from being the top of the conspiracy pyramid, are preventing these theories from being spread further and are therefore putting Jews in danger with your apathy.
That makes no sense.
Actually it does. This is me being sarcastic to show you how stupid your regressive liberal (possibly communist) idea is that speech kills.
That’s a bit simplistic, Werd. I use Jews as an example but that could apply to anyone. I really do hesitate on “limiting” speech on anything. What I would say to you is that there are always potential consequences to spouting wild conspiracy theories about Jews (or anyone else). In the US it is perfectly legal for you or anyone else to push this stuff.Your pragmatic idea is to limit free speech because you think it will protect Jews,
I suspect most people don’t care. Or if they do they will be turned off by the material.whereas people who previously never had a problem with Jews will see them or their shabbos goys attacking America's first amendment and Canada's constitution, etc and then they WILL have a problem with Jews.
No, Werd, again, you are batshit crazy. I will give you some credit for your intelligence.Trapping Jews in a self fulfilling prophecy like this only continues the vicious circle. Breaking it requires a new paradigm. A new way of looking at things. A conspiracy world view which places Jews NOT AT THE TOP and shows who the REAL MASTERS ARE. The REAL REMEDY to save free speech AND Jews from taking false blame for being atop the conspiracy pyramid exists. It's the conspiracy paradigm I subscribe to. Therefore, people who claim to be friends of Jews, shouldn't be so quick to dismiss it and tell others to dismiss it.
As I said, you're too ignorant to understand. Hence, I had to spell it out for you once again.
He is entitled to be batshit crazy, just as you are entitled to wear your kippah/yarmulke. Now Blood Libel is a fact, though not in all reported cases. The "sneaky ones" have been murdering kids for thousands of years; probably the Palestinian war is just another excuse to get some kid blood for their cookies.
Wrong again. 6 said Mendel was guilty for sure. This fact gets left out by you, and everyone else that talks about the case. No surprise.
And the idiot just repeats himself.Speech can kill people
Gee, no shit. Probably because one of the main proponents of Greg Hallett's theory is Jew conspiracy writer Henry Makow. A Jew wrote it, therefore it's wrong is their epistemology. Well as you've seen by that huge list of books which is only a FRACTION of my library, I've been at conspiracy reading too long to be such an amateur.I don’t think many of your fellow RODOH dwellers are with you on this one.
We're not talking about me. We're talking about you. But I'll play along despite your red herring attempt. I know of a lot of horrible verses that are in those books because of authentic, rabbi certified English translations I have seen. Or in books written by gifted gentile Hebraists whose books were so damning that Jews bought them and locked them away. I'm talking of course about Eisenmenger's book Traditions of the Jews. Now as for books with accurate translations from the Hebrew and the Aramaic, I'm also thinking of Justin Pranaitis' The Talmud Unmasked as well as Michael Hoffman's Judaism's Strange Gods and Judaism Discovered as well as Alexander McCaul's The Talmud Tested. The Talmud is a very racist, anti gentile book. It's also very anti female and it has loopholes that excuse or permit murder and robbery of gentiles as well as sex with children. You thought the Koran and Hadiths were bad in Islam? Maaaan, you should take a look at an uncensored Talmud! When Michael Hoffman wrote his books, he had an uncensored Steinsaltz edition in English that they never finished publishing. Gee, I wonder why. The first English Talmud from the 1930's the Soncino edition has been exposed as being heavily redacted and edited. As we have seen with the Mendel Beilis transcripts, Jews love to edit and lie about what's in their Talmud. It seems to be a habit of many Jews: Lying about what's actually in written records.And you do?you don't know the Talmud, the Kabbalah, and any other esoteric strain of Judaism.
Well when high level masons and satanists practice it in conjunction with child abuse, then I have a problem.Magic isn’t real, Werd. There are people who believe that it is. I don’t begrudge them that.
1. That's one of the pieces of evidence, sure.Like wound patterns and things like that?What I am saying is that there is specific evidence of Hasidic Jews and Hasidic Jews ALONE being guilty of blood rites.
So you're disagreeing that we need to spread a paradigm that disproves conspiracy theories that blame "the Jews" for everything? Even though you claim free speech and certain theories can have negative consequences for Jews? I'm confused. Shouldn't you want that? Why do you reject a remedy for a sicknessNo, Werd,Trapping Jews in a self fulfilling prophecy like this only continues the vicious circle. Breaking it requires a new paradigm. A new way of looking at things. A conspiracy world view which places Jews NOT AT THE TOP and shows who the REAL MASTERS ARE. The REAL REMEDY to save free speech AND Jews from taking false blame for being atop the conspiracy pyramid exists. It's the conspiracy paradigm I subscribe to. Therefore, people who claim to be friends of Jews, shouldn't be so quick to dismiss it and tell others to dismiss it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests