Tell all you want. Prove it. Refute the Richard Gage video. Refute the architects and engineers in the videos been-there posted on page one...Here is is in a nutshell Werd: You attempted to say that the tower didn't fall to the middle because there would be no side being the side of least resistance. And I answered by telling you that is not the reality of the situation.
OH THAT'S RIGHT YOU STILL REFUSE TO CLICK AND GO THERE.
And you also have issues with reading comprehension. I said that there were chunks of concrete AND PULVERIZED concrete that was so fine, it could not have happened just by accident without secondary charges.Your other theory was something to do with how the remains of the tower was pulverized into dust and you seemed to suggest that would be consistent with explosive charges. I told you that wasn't of any consequence simply because the lower part of the tower simply wasn't pulverized as it was falling.
Maybe you don't have reading comprehension issues after all.I believe your position to be that the airplanes did minimal damage to the twin towers and the catastrophic damage that caused them to fall was done by explosive charges.
I guess you do. Me calling myself a 9-11 skeptic and your PREVIOUS ADMISSION that I am indeed a 9-11 conspiracy theoristIf that's correct...
is somehow all ontologically wiped out. First you admit that I am a 9-11 conspiracy theorist, and now you are not only feigning ignorance about what I believe, but also feigning ignorance about what been-there believes.If we can continue on anything Werd, it would be an examination on what causes you, and people like you, to get into these crazed conspiracy theories.
You are incapable of being honest.