It was off topic. Of course I was going to try and keep the thread on topic.
There you go, ignoring my point that you went off topic.I asked what about X? You ignored it. Of course I'm going to be on your case to NOT ignore it.You are being disingenuous. I was specifically referring to the denier run forums, not denial in general.
Good, stick to the topic. That is what has caused all sorts of debates to turn to crap. You go off topic.Okay.That some deniers have had some problems at some archives, is not relevant to my point about my point about how posting here and elsewhere restricts debate when deniers are asked to evidence their claims.
Which is off topic.I'm pretty sure I showed in the now closed topic within the first page, a series of links to old debates where YOU were discussing nothing but simply evading, equivocating, context shifting, and non sequitor making. None of your points for example about gas tight doors or shower heads in one of the leichenkellers were original. They were all originally argued by Pressac and then demolished by Mattogno. My only point in putting up all those pages from Mattogno books was to show that you were late to the party.You were trying to deflect the topic I want to discuss, off topic because you cannot deal with my actual point.
There is no evidence that the Nazis transported Jews to somewhere they did not control and just left them there. It is impossible for that to have happened, without leaving any evidence.My evidence that skepticism about the gas chamber story is justified is all of the holes in the official story found by Mattogno, Rudolf and Graf that you pretend don't exist.Your "evidence" consists of
1. no eye witnesses
2. no documents
I'm not sure what's impossible about putting Jews on trains and sending them East just out of the sphere of German control where they will have to then fend for themselves.3. pretending that it does not matter that the physically impossible transportation, feeding, clothing and accommodating of 1.274 million Jews by the end of 1942, plus other mass transports such as the Dutch Jews to Sobibor in 1943 and Hungarian Jews to Birkenau in 1944, without leaving any evidence at all, contradicts the claims made by Mattogo et al.
No evidence means it did not happen.
That does not mean therefore it did not happen at all.Mattogno and Rudolf and Graf and even Berg have shown enough holes in the holocaust story to make me take a second look and go, "Something's not right here. It couldn't have happened as has been claimed."You admit that you cannot provide a rational or logical explanation for believing in what you cannot evidence.
You are ignoring the massive hole in denial, it has no evidence to back up its claim that no one was gassed at the AR camps and inside the kremas.
That hole is such an embarrassment to those who run this forum that any debate about it is locked down.