Nessie is caught out lying again!

[Huntinger]

Nessie, your days of trolling and cockamamie excuses are over. Get used to it.

It could head to the Ha-Kotel Ha-Maʿaravi הַכּוֹתֶל הַמַּעֲרָבִי and wail till its heart heals. co ordinates are: 31° 46′ 36.12″ N, 35° 14′ 4.2″ E

[Turnagain]

Brings up the mental image of Nessie wailing at the anti-trolling wall DC has built around RODOH.

[Nessie]

Brings up the mental image of Nessie wailing at the anti-trolling wall DC has built around RODOH.

By trolling, you mean being asked to evidence your claims. Which is not trolling at all.

[Huntinger]

By trolling, you mean being asked to evidence your claims. Which is not trolling at all.

Jude, it is when that is your only argument on every thread, every post without any intention of discussing anything.

[Turnagain]

Wail away, Nessie, but your trolling days are over. Get used to it.

[Werd]

"Well where did the Jews go then?"

"Fallacy of incredulity."

"There is evidence."

[Nessie]

"Well where did the Jews go then?"

A question for which you have no answer.

"Fallacy of incredulity."

Which is what you rely on, as you have no evidence and you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence.

"There is evidence."

Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps.

[Huntinger]

Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps.

What a shame this long winded topic cannot be discussed down here. This is what happens when you are naughty and you have been quite incorrigible. It was noted that you tried the same boring repitition over at Klowns where after calling you a few names they begged Scott to take you back. Your scarlet sins are still a shade of crimson so it would be a while before the whiteness shines through so to speak.

[Werd]

"Well where did the Jews go then?"

A question for which you have no answer.

"Fallacy of incredulity."

Which is what you rely on, as you have no evidence and you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence.

"There is evidence."

Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps.

Crying fallacy of incredulity is what Nessie does when he knows something that an eyewitness claims violates the law of physics. Such as 4 corpses being reduced to a smashable skeleton in 30 minutes in a Birkenau muffle that can't exceed 1100 degrees! "You can't prove it's impossible." Um, cremation technology proves it is in fact impossible because other cremation experiments have shown LESS corpses take MORE time at THE SAME TEMPERATURE!

Then when he tries to cite documents proving such was possible, only to be shown that the documents are projections or estimations and NOT about ovens that ACTUALLY were built or used, he then pivots to "well where did they go then?". At which point we admit we can only speculate. Then he says, "there is evidence" and he points to an undefined, unquantified amount of cremation remains in the AR camps. Of course such physical evidence is not inconsistent with a revisionist hypothesis of burning corpses of natural mortality. But what Nessie does is commit the fallacy of All A's are B, therefore all B's are A when he goes: "Well witnesses talk about cremation remains, and cremation remains exist. Therefore gas chambers, also."

Nessie is a big fan of non sequitors, excluded third middles and circular reasoning. Not to mention vague language since that permits another one of his fallacies: equivocation as seen here.
https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=155081#p155081

Let's also recall his famous figure 8 reasoning that was exposed. His circular reasoning squared!
https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=163727#p163727

[Nessie]

"Well where did the Jews go then?"

A question for which you have no answer.

"Fallacy of incredulity."

Which is what you rely on, as you have no evidence and you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence.

"There is evidence."

Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps.

Crying fallacy of incredulity is what Nessie does when he knows something that an eyewitness claims violates the law of physics. Such as 4 corpses being reduced to a smashable skeleton in 30 minutes in a Birkenau muffle that can't exceed 1100 degrees! "You can't prove it's impossible." Um, cremation technology proves it is in fact impossible because other cremation experiments have shown LESS corpses take MORE time at THE SAME TEMPERATURE!

You have no actual physical experimentation to back up your claims.

Then when he tries to cite documents proving such was possible, only to be shown that the documents are projections or estimations and NOT about ovens that ACTUALLY were built or used,

You have no evidence to show that none of the documents were based on actual cremations.

he then pivots to "well where did they go then?". At which point we admit we can only speculate.

There is no speculation. You have no evidence they even left the AR camps or Birkenau, let alone they were transported, fed, clothed and accommodated elsewhere. That is not speculation, that is a fact. You even admit that now.

You dodge explaining why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence.

You dodge that it is impossible to have transported, fed, clothed and accommodated so many people without leaving any evidence.

Then he says, "there is evidence" and he points to an undefined, unquantified amount of cremation remains in the AR camps. Of course such physical evidence is not inconsistent with a revisionist hypothesis of burning corpses of natural mortality. But what Nessie does is commit the fallacy of All A's are B, therefore all B's are A when he goes: "Well witnesses talk about cremation remains, and cremation remains exist. Therefore gas chambers, also."

There is evidence they were gassed and cremated at the AR camps.
There is no evidence they left the camp and were transported, fed, clothed and accommodated elsewhere.

Nessie is a big fan of non sequitors, excluded third middles and circular reasoning. Not to mention vague language since that permits another one of his fallacies: equivocation as seen here.
https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=155081#p155081

I am a big fan of what can be evidenced being believed over what cannot be evidenced. I use evidence to determine what happened. You use fallacies.