It could head to the Ha-Kotel Ha-Maʿaravi הַכּוֹתֶל הַמַּעֲרָבִי and wail till its heart heals. co ordinates are: 31° 46′ 36.12″ N, 35° 14′ 4.2″ E

It could head to the Ha-Kotel Ha-Maʿaravi הַכּוֹתֶל הַמַּעֲרָבִי and wail till its heart heals. co ordinates are: 31° 46′ 36.12″ N, 35° 14′ 4.2″ E
SUPPORT RODOH!
Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH? Please kindly contact Scott Smith ([email protected]). Any and all contributions are welcome!
By trolling, you mean being asked to evidence your claims. Which is not trolling at all.
Jude, it is when that is your only argument on every thread, every post without any intention of discussing anything.
A question for which you have no answer.
Which is what you rely on, as you have no evidence and you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence."Fallacy of incredulity."
Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps."There is evidence."
What a shame this long winded topic cannot be discussed down here. This is what happens when you are naughty and you have been quite incorrigible. It was noted that you tried the same boring repitition over at Klowns where after calling you a few names they begged Scott to take you back. Your scarlet sins are still a shade of crimson so it would be a while before the whiteness shines through so to speak.
Crying fallacy of incredulity is what Nessie does when he knows something that an eyewitness claims violates the law of physics. Such as 4 corpses being reduced to a smashable skeleton in 30 minutes in a Birkenau muffle that can't exceed 1100 degrees! "You can't prove it's impossible." Um, cremation technology proves it is in fact impossible because other cremation experiments have shown LESS corpses take MORE time at THE SAME TEMPERATURE!Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:25 pmA question for which you have no answer.
Which is what you rely on, as you have no evidence and you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence."Fallacy of incredulity."
Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps."There is evidence."
You have no actual physical experimentation to back up your claims.Werd wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 8:15 pmCrying fallacy of incredulity is what Nessie does when he knows something that an eyewitness claims violates the law of physics. Such as 4 corpses being reduced to a smashable skeleton in 30 minutes in a Birkenau muffle that can't exceed 1100 degrees! "You can't prove it's impossible." Um, cremation technology proves it is in fact impossible because other cremation experiments have shown LESS corpses take MORE time at THE SAME TEMPERATURE!Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:25 pmA question for which you have no answer.
Which is what you rely on, as you have no evidence and you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence."Fallacy of incredulity."
Only for gassings, not your claim they left the camps."There is evidence."
You have no evidence to show that none of the documents were based on actual cremations.Then when he tries to cite documents proving such was possible, only to be shown that the documents are projections or estimations and NOT about ovens that ACTUALLY were built or used,
There is no speculation. You have no evidence they even left the AR camps or Birkenau, let alone they were transported, fed, clothed and accommodated elsewhere. That is not speculation, that is a fact. You even admit that now.he then pivots to "well where did they go then?". At which point we admit we can only speculate.
There is evidence they were gassed and cremated at the AR camps.Then he says, "there is evidence" and he points to an undefined, unquantified amount of cremation remains in the AR camps. Of course such physical evidence is not inconsistent with a revisionist hypothesis of burning corpses of natural mortality. But what Nessie does is commit the fallacy of All A's are B, therefore all B's are A when he goes: "Well witnesses talk about cremation remains, and cremation remains exist. Therefore gas chambers, also."
I am a big fan of what can be evidenced being believed over what cannot be evidenced. I use evidence to determine what happened. You use fallacies.Nessie is a big fan of non sequitors, excluded third middles and circular reasoning. Not to mention vague language since that permits another one of his fallacies: equivocation as seen here.
https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=155081#p155081
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest