I explained the methodology AS YOU DEMANDED. To supplement that, I gave examples. Here they are again.
Special basements = corpse cellars. Nothing more.
Nessie once tried to say that erecting horse stable barracks for special treatment was code for homicide. I showed otherwise.
The special cellars were literally corpse cellars with an air exchange/ventilation system.
The doors and windows were meaningless and already refuted.
Actually when I put it into the context of other documents, we see the witnesses are lying. This is why you want to LITERALLY EXCLUDE ALL THE EXTRA DOCUMENTS MATTOGNO FOUND!Put that into the context of all of the witness claims
No lying eyewitness is going to overturn the documents which show the real context of the Swoboda document. Special treatment was meant for corpses, not living people.and circumstantial evidence and there is proof of mass gassings of Jews.
The reason you idiots claim a code language is because you already believe the witnesses. So pointing to "code language" as proof of anything is question begging. It's not evidence just because it "sounds" good."6 gas-tight doors....Design exactly like the doors for special t[reatment] of the J[ews]" That evidence special treatment involved gas and Jews.
Note to Nessie. READ THE WHOLE CHAPTER. START HERE!
Guess what we find out about that document with "design exactly like the doors" THE BUILDING UNDER DISCUSSION IS A DELOUSING BUILDING THAT YOU ADMITTED JEWS WERE NOT GASSED IN!!! THEY WERE DELOUSING THE CLOTHES AND PROPERTY OF JEWS.
IT WAS THE FIRST GODDAMN CHAPTER I PUT UP IN THIS TOPIC ON PAGE ONE. I EVEN INTERJECTED MY COMMENTS WITH BIG TEXT LIKE THIS IN ORDER TO DRIVE THE POINT HOME THAT THERE WAS NO CRIMINAL TRACE. WHEN YOU CHECK THE SUBSEQUENT PAGES, YOU FIND MUCH MORE DOCUMENTS CITED FROM THE RGVA ARCHIVE OF THE CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION OFFICE OF AUSCHWITZ! SO YOU GET MUCH MORE THAN 2 EXTRA RGVA DOCUMENTS!
You're such an embarrassment.