Hey all, your old pal Eric Hunt here.
Hello Mr. Hunt. I would like to thank you for all the hard work you put into exposing the holohoax. Like you, I was brainwashed during my school years to believe the physically impossible big-lies about mass murder and mass cremation at camps like Belzec and Treblinka. Your work probably helped me open my eyes and see the truth as much as any other revisionist and I will be forever indebted to you for that. Again, thank you.
If Mike debated anyone truly knowledgeable, for instance, Roberto Muelenkamp like Berg did, many of those listening would no longer be able to fall for the tired denier tropes *(memes) of "no evidence of mass cremation pits", etc., etc.
Those like Peinovich that even put on the pretense that they desire an open debate have to choose unqualified, unknowledgeable opponents, build them up as a literal strawman to beat up, pull denier tricks, then do a victory dance to their echo chamber of naive followers.
Mr. Hunt, what I see in your OP is disturbing to say the least. I've read through this thread and see that you were given a golden opportunity to present your case but seemed to have bailed when push came to shove.
Deniers have to to cull the cult. They can only present their tweet sized memes and for instance, not the core samples proving massive amounts of human ash taken at Belzec, or other intelligent, undeniable physical evidence for mass murder. This is why I was banned from so-called "Open Debate on the Holocaust" the second I came to the conclusion which rebuts their very closed cult's delusion.
Peinovich refuses to let you learn what I've learned in over ten years of looking into Holocaust denial and coming to the conclusion that it's a dead end.
Mr. Hunt, I am totally confused here. I came to believe what I believe about the holohoax in large part from what I've leaned from you. If you have information that you can give me that would "reeducate" me, then by all means, it is your ethical responsibility to present it here. You claim that you have "undeniable physical evidence for mass murder." If so, please please please present what you have right here right now in this thread.
Jews were murdered by bullets, gassed, and cremated. Mike Peinovich is incredibly afraid of even allowing me to express what I've learned freely or privately let alone debate... Holocaust denial is a dead end. Jews were massacred. The case can and has been proven entirely by archaeology not "millions of lying Jews in on the hoax", "Nuremberg defendant torture" or other denier memes.
Denial only continues because deniers like Germar Rudolf and Mike Peinovich ban those who can prove denial to be false from communicating to their cult. Only these dictators can decide and curate what is "serious" or not.
Mr. Hunt, you have not been banned here. I see no reason why, after saying what you have said, that you don't present the proof that you say you have. You say that "The case can and has been proven entirely by archaeology." You are one of the reasons that I don't believe that (THE TREBLINKA ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX) so why don't you present it here?
The NeoNazi Holocaust deniers Mike Peinovich and "Eric Striker" are afraid to let you hear what a major "Revisionist" of our generation has to say.
I want 'to hear what you have to say Mr. Hunt, and I would like to hear it right here, and I am at a loss as to why you would refuse to do so unless it is you that is lying about the "massive amounts of human ash" at the camps.
Ideology such as Holocaust denial, which claims Nazi mass murders of millions to be the greatest hoax in human history, warps the minds of impressionable listeners and leads to extreme consequences in the real world.
Ultimately, Holocaust denial is indefensible which is why denier gatekeepers such as Rudolf and Peinovich can't actually defend it against anyone knowledgeable about these mass murders. The claim that deniers even desire an open debate is part of the con.
Mr. Hunt, how can you say that and then refuse to present your proof in a forum designed specifically for you to do so? The fact that you refuse to do so makes me suspect that your claims are false.
Denial is easily dismantled if given the opportunity to reply to their con game which involves refusing to acknowledge massive evidence which exists, then claiming it doesn't exist. Holocaust Denial is a hoax.
See my above comment.