You haven't proven they were 'witch trials' , so that's a non-starter for a start. How were the Nazis 'hapless' ? What does that even mean and how is it relevant to the fact they nearly all confirmed the existence of gas chambers and cremations ?Turnagain wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2020 6:50 pmLupus wrote:Lupus, your reply doesn't even come up to the standards of a weak suck weasel dodge. Your entire premise rests on the dubious testimony of some hapless German soldiers caught up in some postwar vengeful witch trials. You bleat about "documentary and forensic evidence" but produce none of it.Problem for Turnagain, is that the existence of gas chambers, mass extermination and cremation were all confirmed by the Nazi perpetrators. Throw in a bit of incriminating documentary and forensic evidence, and all Turnagains little quibbles about the minutia of death camp actions and activity become totally irrelevant.
There are at least eleven alleged eyewitnesses who claim that the gas chambers were not only hermetically sealed but six of them claim that the gas chambers also functioned as vacuum chambers. Care to explain how that was possible?
Arad, ARC, Sturdy-Colls et al. claimed that the draglines dug the mass graves. Care to explain how that was possible?
Then we have the magic Jew barbeque but, according to you, how the cremation of ~1.4 million corpses was accomplished is just a bit of minutia. Do you have some documentary or forensic evidence to show how that was done?Besides the IMT there were twelve (12) other trials known as Nuremberg type trials conducted through 1949 that all subscribed to the precedents of the IMT. There is NO evidence that those precedents were relaxed until 1975 or later. You obviously don't have any evidence let alone proof that judicial notice wasn't a factor in the witch trials of the 60s. Either produce some evidence for your claims or they fall on their arse, Lupus.This is why he had to invent his claim that Judicial Notice was in place during the trials, cos it removes the corroborating testimony from the ideal group of witnesses who knew what actually happened - the Nazis .Yep, squashing little hoaxer bugs like you is an agreeable winter pastime. Seeing you (and others like you) blow smoke and horse frocky but then come up empty for your holyhoax is a hoot.Indulging in rants and squashing little hoaxer bugs like Lupus is entertaining and a good way to pass time during an Alaskan winter.
So you want me to explain why eleven eyewitnesses claimed the gas chambers were hermetically sealed ? Well, first you have to ask yourself if these witnesses would be properly qualified to make such a claim. Ask yourself that first, then if you arrive at the answer 'yes' you will need to explain how you arrived at that conclusion. Will you be able to do that ? If you can then respond on another thread, not here as you're clogging it up with off topic posts.
Do the same for the witnesses who claimed the chambers functioned as 'vacuum chambers'.
Who cares how the fires were started ? No-one else does apart from you. If you find it incomprehensible that wood is flammable, and you light it with a match then i'm afraid you really are going to have problems discussing most things.
Why did you even bother to type that passage referring to the Nuremberg Trials. It doesn't prove anything. Especially when you haven't even produced evidence that Judicial Notice of Jews being murdered in gas chambers at Auschwitz or Treblinka was taken at Nuremberg !!!! Wow, how mad is that ?