I have highlighted in bold the part that Been There has fabricated, being his claim that Baddiel DENIED the existence of a swimming pool and bakery.The closest Baddiel ever got to going into credible details about this compulsory, emotionally-manipulative, pseudo-historical 'holocaust' narrative, was in the brief excerpts of the half hour interview he had with Dermot Mulqueen in Ireland.
And ironically it was David Baddiel himself who actually showed himself to be the 'denier'. As he DENIED that Auschwitz had a swiming pool and bakeries. He also 'denied' the empirically sound arguments about credible amounts of bodies in single muffles and the time it takes to cremate alleged mass-gassing victims in crematoria.
To these and other easily evidenced statements of empirically provable fact David said "none of it is true Dermot, that's the thing. None of it is real. Are you able to understand that you have bought into a lie?"
To which Dermot laughs and smilingly says "Well I'd say the very same about you".
To which Baddiel replies: "No, no, let me explain. I'm not here to hear you spouting wierd facts and figures”..
In other words Baddiel believes any facts and figures that empirically prove the narrative to be false, flawed or exaggerated are to him just 'wierd'.
So again we have here definitive proof that idiotic belief in this enforced narrative requires REAL 'denial' in order to maintain that idiotic and wilfully ignorant belief.
Unfortunately for Been There, he got caught with his panties down, as Baddiel did nothing of the sort. A more accurate account of this particular part of the interview was supplied by myself on the other thread :
Bizarrely, when I made Been There aware of his little 'error' , even offering him the benefit of the doubt that he may had got muddled up in the chronology of events in the video, he reacted by having a full blown hissy fit , throwing around personal insults and going into full-on denier mode with the following outburst :Baddiel does NOT deny Auschwitz had a swimming pool or a bakery. You have conflated two separate sections of the interview and indulged in some desperate form of self-editing to arrive at this false account of proceedings. Directly after Mulqueen mentions the bakery and swimming pool , Baddiel's response is just to rub his eyes and make a noise resembling a sigh, in despair. He DOES NOT respond in the way you claim, ie to deny their existence.
He then must have realised his error, and that I was right about Baddiel NOT denying the existence of the swimming pool and bakery, for his next action was to put me on ignore , which is the forum equivalent of running away after being exposed as a liar.You are a stupid person who is in denial. That's the sum of it. You — like every H true-believer I have ever come across who defends the H online — have previously been exposed not understanding what constitutes empirical evidence.
And Baddiel DID deny and disregard ALL of Mulqueen's reading on the Holocaust. Check the video again and compare with my accurate quoting of it.
Provide your own transcript if you insist in this denial.
SUMMARY You are not only in denial of reality, you are another stupid person of low-intelligence who has now shown you are incapable of understanding simple statements in a RECENT documentary that we can all check. So it is hardly surprising that you are incapable of intelligently assessing war narratives from events of eighty years ago.
So, for the benefit of anyone interested ( approx zero as Nessie has been banished to Siberia for asking for evidence, and the remaining 2 regular posters are morons) what follows is a brief paraphrased transcript of the video , from 48:20 when Mulqueen first introduces the topic of swimming pools and bakeries :
Mulqueen : Auschwitz had a swimming pool , it had bakeries
(Baddiel rubs his eyes and makes a sighing noise)
Mulqueen : The Jews control the BBC
Baddiel : In what way ? If I controlled the BBC i would be on it more
And that's it, Baddiel does NOT deny the existence of those facilities, yet Been There claims he did, and maintains his claim even after I expose him as a liar !!!! So what kind of shameful behaviour is this ? How can anyone take this guy seriously after this latest embarrassing episode in the cranky world of Holocaust revisionism ???