Proving/Disproving the Holocaust in less than an hour

Discuss the alleged Nazi genocide or other wartime atrocities without fear of censorship. No bullying of fellow posters is allowed at RODOH. If you can't be civil, please address the argument and not the participants. Do not use disparaging alterations of the user-names of other RODOH posters or their family members. Failure to heed warnings from Moderators will result in a 24 hour ban (or longer if necessary).
User avatar
Huntinger
Posts: 6397
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 4:56 am
Location: Gasthaus Waldesruh. Swabia
Contact:

Re: Proving/Disproving the Holocaust in less than an hour

Post by Huntinger »

Nessie wrote:
Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:48 am
You have provided no GPR or any other evidence to show no (or very little in the way of) ground disturbances.
You have provided no forrensic evidence to show no cremated remains mixed into the ground.
You have provided no witnesses who worked at the camp who say no gassings and what happened instead.
You have provided no documents to show mass transports back out of the camp that arrived anywhere else.

You keep on dodging, so I will keep on reminding you that you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence, over what is evidenced.
This poster posted the following here about 24 hours later. Even the spelling mistakes are identical. It is profoundly clear this poster is just copying and pasting without considered reflection to advance any knowledge. It is clear this poster has little interest in clarifying history but the opposite, to obfuscate it.
You have provided no GPR or any other evidence to show no (or very little in the way of) ground disturbances.
You have provided no forrensic evidence to show no cremated remains mixed into the ground.
You have provided no witnesses who worked at the camp who say no gassings and what happened instead.
You have provided no documents to show mass transports back out of the camp that arrived anywhere else.

You keep on dodging, so I will keep on reminding you that you are unable to explain why anyone should believe what you cannot evidence, over what is evidenced.
It says Less volume in the chamber, the less gas is needed, the lower any pressure change (assuming there is no means to regulate pressure
.
It is clear this poster has very little technical knowledge and is making uninformed layman assumptions. It is out of its depth.


𝕴𝖈𝖍 𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖚𝖊 𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖙𝖘...𝕾𝖔𝖟𝖎𝖆𝖑 𝖌𝖊𝖍𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖗 𝕹𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖑

𝕳𝖚̈𝖓𝖙𝖎𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖗


Would you like to financially contribute to the upkeep of RODOH, kindly contact Scott Smith. All contributions are welcome!


Turnagain
Posts: 7320
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Proving/Disproving the Holocaust in less than an hour

Post by Turnagain »

If the sentence, "Water is wet" were somehow incorporated into a revisionist position, Nessie would be here declaring that water isn't actually wet. After all, water is just the liquid form of H2O so the revisionist must prove that the liquid form was actually used...it COULDA' been cold so the water would be ice...etc.

So it goes with Nessie and the hermetically sealed gas chamber. However, he can't seem to comprehend the fact that as the volume of space available for the exhaust is reduced the faster the pressure will rise. If the volume of space available for the gas is reduced to one (1) m^3 then the time needed to raise the pressure to .5 atm is under 2 (1.875) seconds. So it goes in Nessie's la-la land.

Nessie wrote:
That over 75 years later, it is still possible to find cremains on the surface of the camp is evidence that a lot was buried there.
Note how carefully Nessie avoids the question, "How much cremains have been found"? He also avoids the question of, "Have those alleged cremains been laboratory tested to prove they are actual human cremains"? The quantity of cremains, their origin and authenticity are questions that Nessie weasel dodges and refuses to answer. So it goes in Nessie's la-la land.
I do not believe that you have even watched Hunts video if you are asking me that. The witnesses clearly stated on arrival that the Nazis asked about certain workers needed and those who identified themselves were taken, mostly to Majdanek, where they worked.
Nessie weasel dodges the fact that most of the witnesses from the Spielberg interviews make no mention at all of their specific skills. None of the witnesses declare that they were "selected for work". That's just Nessie's weasel dodge to avoid having to admit that deportees did, in fact, transit through Treblinka.
The burden of proof is on you to back up your claim of no gassings, cremains or graves.
Nessie is still trying to shift the burden of proof. Nessie is still FAILING.

No cremains, no graves, no holyhoax. Finito. End of story.

Turnagain
Posts: 7320
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Proving/Disproving the Holocaust in less than an hour

Post by Turnagain »

Huntinger wrote:
It is clear this poster has very little technical knowledge and is making uninformed layman assumptions. It is out of its depth.
Nessie is a true believer. As such, he has no intention of allowing facts or reality to intrude on his belief.

rollo the ganger
Posts: 6232
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:34 am
Contact:

Re: Proving/Disproving the Holocaust in less than an hour

Post by rollo the ganger »

Nessie's claim that finding a shark tooth at Treblinka proves that 800,000 people were gassed, buried, reinterred, cremated and reburied certainly shuts down this debate. I mean... how can you argue with that?

I found a shark tooth at the beach last summer and it had me wondering just what was under that sand.

User avatar
Depth Check
Site Moderator
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:49 am
Contact:

Re: Proving/Disproving the Holocaust in less than an hour

Post by Depth Check »

Gentlemen, please get back on topic or I will lock this thread.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests