Sandhurst wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:40 am
Witnesses are unreliable unless they are independent. With the Jewish witnesses they had an axe to grind, but the Russian witnesses provide valuable clues.
nice try. so if X ethnic group is allegedly targetted in a genocide, witnesses from that ethnic group are unreliable by definition cause they'll have an "axe to grind"?
Would you apply that standard to "ukranian christians" who were allegedly genocided by "bolshevik jews" ? also, polish, german, russian, or every other non-jew goy european witnesses are also considered unreliable when it comes to the jewish holocaust
Soviets are experts at fakes and forgeries and also at hiding their culpability.
not really. at Katyn they left all the bodies buried in the forest with bullet holes in their skulls right at the place of their execution. they didnt try to spread them out or burn them or move them. the locals knew what happened, thats how the Polish govt in exile found out through the polish underground later during German occupation, and German intelligence shortly after that. seems pretty sloppy to me
It is quite possible that if millions of people were murdered by a Soviet Holocaust,
then about 3 million Polish jews held by them could easily be caught up in their horror.
ah yes, the judeo bolsheviks were the ones that did the jewish holocaust, not the actual nazis who saws the jews as subhuman vermin. revisionist copes are so funny
They say that the archives are opened but what never existed or what was destroyed can never be reclaimed.
THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE