He has a relatively current picture of Ursula Haverbeck:
Followed by a picture of a present-day Nazi cosplay LARPer from South America (I've seen her pictures before but don't remember where she was from exactly - I think it was Argentina)!
Somehow this picture is going around the Internet purporting to be a picture of a young Ursula Haverbeck and Faurisson has included it in his blog post about Ursula Haverbeck!
Right under that picture Faurisson claims:
He conveniently neglects to mention that it states under that heading in bold letters: "nicht explosiv" or "not explosive"!Faurisson wrote:In the long technical sheet concerning the nature and use of the Zyklon (Nuremberg Document NI-9912), a warning, expressed in bold type, bore, from the first page, " Explosionsgefahr ", or " Risk of explosion ". ...
So just the act of discussing the explosiveness of Zyklon - even to emphatically state that Zyklon is not explosive - is enough for Faurisson to conclude it IS EXPLOSIVE! Then he goes on to say:
For one thing, the alleged usage of Zyklon would NOT have been explosive. And for another, the ovens were NOT in or near enough to the alleged gas chambers - not even the ovens of Krema I.Faurisson wrote:Now, see this madness: we want to make us believe that in Auschwitz and Birkenau, for example, the alleged homicidal gas chambers would have been installed in the very center of crematoria where ovens were operating which had to be heated to the temperature of about 900 degrees! A guaranteed disaster!
How long has Faurisson been senile? He has been made aware of these facts for many years now. Germar Rudolf even made a video to set the record straight on these, and other, points in direct response to him: