The Jewish role in moulding public perception of WW2 — then and now.
Anyone who wants to understand the current view of what is nebulously referred to as 'the Holocaust'
and who wants to impartially understand WW2 will HAVE to understand the Jewish role in moulding public perception of that.
Jews and Jewish-controlled mass-media, with Jewish advisers to governments (Samuel Untermyer, Fredrick Lindemann, Leo Amery, Ivan Maisky, Henry Morgantheau, Bernard Baruch, William C. Bullitt, etc., etc.,) have been moulding public perception of that war:
• from BEFORE it even started,
• to helping causing it,
• to helping mobilise public support for waging it against Germany,
• for demonising Hitler prior to and after the war,
• for publicising false atrocity propaganda against the entire German nation during the war and AFTER it was over,
• and for still today creating a compulsory narrative regarding WW2, the European Jewish experience of it and of the NSDAP.
Remember that it was organisations representing world Jewry who decided on a public show-trial of high ranking Germans at Nuremberg for ‘war crimes’ after WW2. None of the victor leaders (who knew that they themselves were war-criminal mass-murderers of millions of deliberately targeted civilians: Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt and Truman) — wanted that initially.
Here is an aricle bragging about the key role of three Jews operating behind the scenes in initiating and influencing the Nuremberg show-trials
One of these Jews admits that Jewish organisations had been working on this mission to elevate awareness of only Jewish war-time suffering since the winter of 1939-1940! [Think about that for a moment]
Since the establishment of the Institute for Jewish Affairs, [Jew] Jacob Robinson
of the Institute and it's team had laboured to make the make the point that the massacre of European Jewry was a unique and distinct crime. “We have been working in this field for four and a half years” he wrote to Jackson in June 1945.
...Close study of World Jewish Congress
archive materials by Professor Mark Lewis... [show that] Robinson and the World Jewish Congress more than anything else wanted recognition of the Germans’ crimes against the Jewish people as a whole. “The crimes committed against the Jews were …one collective crime directed against a people — a crime [that] started when Hitler took power”
as Robinson explained to the Institute’s staff in December 1944.
In the lead up to the Nuremberg Trial, [Jew] Sir Hersch Lauterpacht
(the Whewell Professor of International Law at the University of Cambridge) ardently urged the British authorities to pursue Nazi war criminals when the war was over, and he tried, unsuccessfully, to persuade the London-based United Nations War Crimes Commission to establish a special unit to look into anti-Jewish crimes.
https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-a ... -nuremberg
Remember also that according to the man who was the executive trial counsel and supervisor for the United States team in Nuremberg, about 75% of the Nuremberg 'team' who orchestrated that 'show-trial' were Jews
. As anyone who critically and impartially looks into this will know and learn, these 'Jews' were “pushing, crowding and competing with each other and with everyone”
in a quest for both revenge and world publicity of the Allied atrocity propaganda now known and worshipped as 'THE Holocaust'. Jewish prosecutors, Jewish investigators, Jewish translators, Jewish interrogators, Jewish prison psychiatrists, Jewish clerics, etc., etc.
Saying this fact publically will be a cause to get yourself reviled, rebuked and even punished for supposedly repeating anti-semitic
hate tropes. This is the situation society has now reached, when speaking the truth has become treated as a thought-crime.
Here it is though, written in a letter to his wife on September 25, 1945 and revealed to the world by his son:
Thomas J. Dodd wrote:“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial, for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter — it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else.”
Jews not only created that war for Jewish self-interests, they brag about how they have moulded public perceptions towards that war.
In addition to his articulate and learned case for the need to prosecute war crimes and to establish individual criminal responsibility, summed up in an influential article he published in 1944, [Jew] Sir Hersch Lauterpacht
’s distinct contribution to the Nuremberg Trial, written into Article 6 of the IMT, is now widely recognised to have been helping to formulate the notion of a tripartite definition of Nazi criminality (crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity) and in particular the idea of the latter — clearly one of the major legal innovations of the trial
“Crimes against humanity” — later referred to by Jackson as having been suggested by an “eminent scholar of international law” now acknowledged to have been Lauterpacht — derived from the Americans’ concern, at the London planning conference that assembled in the summer of 1945 to plan the trial, about capturing Nazi crimes that, while associated with the war, were committed both before the outbreak of the conflict in 1939 and also were perpetrated against victims in the Germans’ own population.
Lauterpacht, I should add, also played an important role in the drafting of the speeches for his friend the first British chief prosecutor Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe and then, when the Conservatives were replaced by Labour, his successor the new attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross.
That article brags about the influence of certain Jews who acted behind the scenes — bragging that they invented terms such as 'genocide' and even wrote the speeches of the chief prosecutors.
Factor in to this understanding of Jewish contrived post-war injustice and vengeance, that the key Third Reich personnel who could dispute and expose the holocaust mythology were being interrogated and tortured principally by German-speaking Jews or were conveniently found dead (murdered?) in custody.
is the most obvious example of that. He very credibly denied any policy to mass-murder Jews in April 1945 to the Jewish representative for Sweden of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) a man named Norbert Masur
Few people today have ever heard of Mr. Masur nor know of his account of his meeting with Himmler so soon before Himmler's convenient death — allegedly by suicide — whilst in British custody. Think why that is.
Remember also that the last Auschwitz Kommandant Richared Baer
not only denied any mass-gassing programme at Auschwitz but ridiculed the gullibility of people to believe such obviously impractical nonsense narratives. He also died in captivity, dying in his cell shortly before a public trial.
Few people today have ever heard of Mr. Baer nor know of his informed rebuttal of the emerging 'Holocaust' mass-gassing mythology.
Think, why is it that no-one knows his
name, yet almost everyone has heard of Dr. Mengele?
Mind-control, mental manipulation, mass-conditioning is the explanation.
Recall also that Josef Kramer
stayed at his post to hand over Bergen-Belsen to the British in order to prevent an outbreak of Typhus spreading outside the camp. For this humanitarian devotion to duty — and for the well-being of all, civilian, British military, whoever — he was treated abominably and finally hanged. The British Officers who reneged on the agreement of the hand-over of the camp were British Jews.
Three Jewish men were among the first British soldiers who entered the liberated [Bergen-Belsen] camp on April 15, 1944. Among these liberators was Captain Derek Sington, a young man working for British Intelligence at the time these events occurred. Sington appears to have been one of the designated senior officials to first enter Belsen. His written account of the camp’s liberation indicates that he acted with ... the camp commander, Josef Kramer, who was waiting just outside of the main camp to greet and escort the British troops upon arrival.
...On the morning of April 18th, after having spent [three] days and nights in a vile underground cellar enveloped in total darkness, Josef Kramer was taken out of his cell and prepared for transfer out of the camp. The former commandant was manhandled and shackled, both hands and legs. The shackles were much too small for his enormous wrists and cut gaping gashes into his flesh. Kramer was then prodded into a jeep, his shirt ripped from his back, and paraded throughout the camp half-naked, to the accompaniment of jeers, hooting, catcalls, and a resonant howling which sounded to one witness as a “terrifying blend of joy and hate.”
Insults and accusations were not the only items thrown at Kramer. Whatever object the inmates could lay their hands on was thrown at Kramer as he crouched as low as he could in the vehicle, trying to avoid any potentially damaging missiles. Two British soldiers were poised directly behind Kramer, constantly prodding him in the spine with their sten guns, which was a cause for great jubilation among the gleeful inmates, and provoked them to howling with “joy and hate.” After he had been duly exposed to the contempt and wrath of the inmates, Kramer was driven out of the compound, amidst a hail of garbage and debris, never to return.
Kramer is another who initially denied any knowledge of a mass-gassing policy, but after coercion/‘interrogation’/torture he changed his testimony and accepted the lynching that victor-justice had pre-destined for him.
KRAMER DENIES HIS GUILT
"All died from natural causes"
, protested Kramer in a statement read In court in which
he declared that the allegations of mass executions in the gas chambers
and of whippings at Auschwitz were untrue from beginning to end
is another chief SS Officer who categorically denied a mass-gassing policy.
Pohl became the third most powerful figure in the SS, behind Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heydrich.
Reading the Jewish-controlled and policed Wikipedia stubs of these two men Kramer and Pohl, you would never know they refuted the mass-gassing narrative.
But this is how our history is currently being censored and effectively re-written by TV, junk journalism and social media like Wikipedia and Quora, all largely controlled, owned or influenced by people who see themselves as Jews first and foremost, with tribal loyalties to World Jewry before country or nation.
Jews — via the social-media online businesses they own — are currently involved in erasing the history that reveals all this. Wikipedia, Youtube, Facebook, Quora, Google, etc., etc., are currently censoring the net and eradicating content using the excuse of removing 'anti-semitic' content.
And stating the factual, verifiable truth of this is silenced and criminalised as "anti-semitism"
: the list of high-ranking Third Reich Officers who denied the mass gassing allegations is not only extremely long, it is a 100% consistent rebuttal of the accusation as a lie. THEY ALL CATEGORICALLY DENIED ANY
INVOLVEMENT OR KNOWLEDGE OF IT !!!
Yet, most people you talk to today not only do not know this, they delusionally believe the opposite, that the vast majority confessed to being involved.
How is this possible!!?? How can so many people believe the diametrical opposite of the truth?
is another who when asked, categorically denied the mass-gassing atrocity propaganda. Yet who knows this today? According to Goebbel's senior colleaugue Dr. Hans Fritszche, Goebbels said “the gas trucks that they mentioned in the Russian trial were a product of someone's fevered imagination, without any basis whatsoever in fact”
[Hans Fritzsche, June 26th 1946. IMT xvii, pg. 200]
Yet facts such as these are not only never mentioned by main-stream media, TV documentaries or journalists, but the EXACT OPPOSITE is promulgated.
What happened then at that time — the silencing and concealment of truth through murder, intimidation, coercion, bribery, blackmail, and behind-the-scenes influence, by organised world jewry — is still happening now
That is why British media tycoon Robert Maxwell
was murdered by the Israeli intelligence agency.
Maxwell was a 'Jewish' millionaire and spy for Israel and had links to organised crime in Eastern Europe.
Robert Maxwell was one of Israel's super-spys, who received a state funeral in Israel. It was attended by former Israeli PMs and an Israeli former President who praised him. Six serving and former heads of Israeli intelligence services attended Maxwell's funeral in Israel, and then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir stated: “He has done more for Israel than can today be said."
Yet Israel had Mossad agents murder Mr. Maxwell because he demanded Israel help him prop up his failing businesses OR he would expose his knowledge of Israeli secrets, crimes, treacherous activities, spy scandals, spyware, infiltration in world governments.
Now Jeffry Epstein
is just one more high-profile, paedophile Jewish criminal spy. Either he has had a Kit Marlowe
type of feigned death followed by a clandestine exile to somewhere, presumably Israel. Or Epstein has been murdered to silence him, as he threatened to do a Samson
and bring down the whole temple of Israeli-Jewish crime and all its wicked acts IF he didn't get protection.
These latter-day events — and the false narratives about them that the masses are manipulated nto believing — help explain how Jews co-ordinating worldwide, maintain the bogus WW2 narrative in the minds of the masses and why revision of the falsehoods still cannot be openly discussed today.